Skip to main content
Log in

Pupil and parent attitudes towards bullying in primary schools

  • Published:
European Journal of Psychology of Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper describes an investigation of pupil and parent attitudes towards bullying, comparing attitudes with bullying behaviour. 747 parents and 326 children aged 6 to 11 from four primary schools completed the Parental Attitudes to Bullying Scale and the Children’s Attitudes to Bullying Scale. Most were found to be largely sympathetic towards victims, supportive of intervention, but less understanding towards bullies. There was little association between parental and children’s attitudes, nor did parent attitudes predict children’s behaviour, although there was a link between the children’s attitudes and their behaviour. Mothers were more sympathetic than fathers, but there were no sex differences among children. Children with more siblings were more likely to bully others.

Résumé

La recherche présentée dans cet article porte sur les attitudes d’élèves et de parents envers le ‘bullying’, c’est à dire l’intimidation, les brutalités ou brimades. Il s’agit de comparer ces attitudes aux comportements effectifs. 747 parents et 326 enfants âgés de 6 à 11 ans, scolarisés dans quatre écoles primaires, ont été testés avec les échelles “Attitude des Parents” et “Attitudes des enfants envers la brutalité”. La plupart se sont déclarés largement sympathisants à l’égard des victimes et partisans d’une intervention, mais peu compréhensibles à l’égard des coupables. Il y a peu de liaisons entre les attitudes des parents et celles des enfants. L’attitude des parents n’est pas un bon prédicteur du comportement des enfants, bien qu’il y ait un lien entre les attitudes des enfants et leur comportement. Les mères sont plus compréhensives que les pères mais il n’y a aucune différence liée au sexe parmi les enfants. Les enfants appartenant à de grandes fratries sont plus souvent brutaux.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behaviour.Organisational Behaviour And Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, J. (1996).Getting the message across. Education Guardian (A supplement ofThe Guardian newspaper, London), 18th June 1996.

  • Askew, S. (1989). Aggressive behaviour in boys: To what extent is it institutionalised? In D. Tattum & D. Lane (Eds.),Bullying in Schools (pp. 59–71). Stoke on Trent: Trentham Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, L., Smith, P.K., & Binney, V. (1992). Cohesion and power in the families of children involved in bully/victim problems at school.Journal of Family Therapy, 14, 371–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, L., Smith, P.K., & Binney, V. (1994). Perceived family relationships of bullies, victims and bully-victims in middle childhood.Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 11, 215–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowie, H., & Sharp, S. (1996).Peer Counselling: A Time To Listen. London: David Fulton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dishion, T.J. (1990). The family ecology of boy’s peer relations in middle childhood.Child Development, 61, 874–892.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eslea, M., & Smith, P.K. (1994).Developmental Trends in Attitudes Towards Bullying. Poster presented to the 13th Biennial Meetings of the International Society for the Study of Behavioural Development, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

  • Eslea, M., & Smith, P.K. (1995).Attitudes Towards Bullying In Primary School Pupils And Parents. Poster presented to the Annual Conference of the British Psychological Society, Warwick University, UK.

  • Eslea, M., & Smith, P.K. (1998). The long-term effectiveness of anti-bullying work in primary schools.Educational Research, 40, 203–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J.R. (1995). Where is the child’s environment? A group socialisation theory of development.Psychological Review, 102, 458–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maines, B., & Robinson, G. (1992).Michael’s Story: The “No Blame” Approach. Lame Duck Publishing, 10, South Terrace, Redlands, Bristol B56 6GT.

  • Menesini, E., Eslea, M., Smith, P.K., Genta, M.L., Gianetti, E., Fonzi, A., & Costabile, A. (1997). Cross-national comparison of children’s attitudes towards bully/victim problems in school.Aggressive Behaviour, 23, 245–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olweus, D. (1980). Familial and temperamental determinants of aggressive behaviour in adolescent boys: A causal analysis.Child Development, 16, 644–660.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olweus, D. (1984). Development of stable aggressive reaction patterns in males. In R.J. Blanchard & D. C. Blanchard (Eds.),Advances in the Study of Aggression (vol. 1, pp. 103–137). Orlando: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olweus, D. (1993).Bullying at School: What We Know and What We Can Do. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olweus, D. (1997). Bully/victim problems in school: Facts and intervention.European Journal of Psychology of Education.12, 495–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, G.R. (1986). The contribution of siblings to training for fighting: A microsocial analysis. In D. Olweus, J. Block, & M. Radke-Yarrow (Eds.),Development of Antisocial and Prosoctal Behaviour: Research Theories and Issues. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pikas, A. (1989). The Common Concern method for the treatment of mobbing. In E. Roland & E. Munthe (Eds.),Bullying: An International Perspective (pp. 91–104). London: David Fulton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rigby, K., & Slee, P.T. (1991). Bullying among Australian school children: Reported behaviour and attitudes towards victims.Journal of Social Psychology, 131, 615–627.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rigby, K., & Slee, P.T. (1993). Children’s attitudes towards victims. In D. Tattum (Ed.),Understanding and Managing Byllying. Oxford: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivers, I., & Smith, P.K. (1994). Types of bullying behaviour and their correlates.Aggressive Behaviour, 20, 359–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P.K., & Levan, S. (1995). Perceptions and experiences of bullying in younger pupils.British Journal of Educational Psychology, 65, 489–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P.K., & Sharp, S. (1994).School Bullying: Insights and Perspectives. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson, P., & Smith, D. (1989). Bullying in the junior school. In D. Tattum & D. Lane (Eds.),Bullying in Schools (pp. 45–57). Stoke on Trent: Trentham Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitney, I., & Smith, P.K. (1993). A survey of the nature and extent of bully/victim problems in junior/middle and secondary schools.Educational Research, 35, 2–25.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eslea, M., Smith, P.K. Pupil and parent attitudes towards bullying in primary schools. Eur J Psychol Educ 15, 207–219 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173175

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173175

Key words

Navigation