Skip to main content
Log in

Investigation of microsatellite instability in Turkish breast cancer patients

  • Article
  • Published:
Pathology Oncology Research

Abstract

Multiple somatic and inherited genetic changes that lead to loss of growth control may contribute to the development of breast cancer. Microsatellites are tandem repeats of simple sequences that occur abundantly and at random throughout most eucaryotic genomes. Microsatellite instability (MI), characterized by the presence of random contractions or expansions in the length of simple sequence repeats or microsatellites, is observed in a variety of tumors. The aim of this study was to compare tumor DNA fingerprints with constitutional DNA fingerprints to investigate changes specific to breast cancer and evaluate its correlation with clinical characteristics. Tumor and normal tissue samples of 38 patients with breast cancer were investigated by comparing PCR-amplified microsatellite sequences D2S443 and D21S1436. Microsatellite instability at D21S1436 and D2S443 was found in 5 (13%) and 7 (18%) patients, respectively. Two patients displayed instability at both marker loci. No association was found between MI and age, family history, lymph node involvement and other clinical parameters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dickson RB, Lippman ME. Molecular basis of breast cancer. In: The Molecular Basis of Cancer, WB Saunders, 358–384, 1995.

  2. Hovig E, Smith-Sorensen B, Uitterlinden AG, et al: Detection of DNA variation in cancer. Pharmacogenetics 2:317–328, 1992.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Paulson TG, Wright FA, Parker BA, et al: Microsatellite instability correlates with reduced survival and poor disease prognosis in breast cancer. Cancer Res 56:4021–4026, 1996.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ali S, Müller CR, Epplen JT. DNA fingerprinting by oligonucleotide probes specific for simple repeats. Hum Genet 74:239–243, 1986.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Decker RA, Moore J, Ponder B, et al: Linkage mapping of human chromosome 10 microsatellite polymorphisms. Genomics 12:604–606, 1992.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Weber JL, Wong C. Mutation of human short tandem repeats. Hum Mol Genet 2:1123–1128, 1993.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Branch P, Aquilina G, Bignami M, et al: Defective mismatch binding and a mutator phenotype in cells tolerant to DNA damage. Nature 362:652–654, 1993.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fey MF, Wells RA, Wainscoat JS, et al: Assessment of clonality in gastrointestinal cancer by DNA fingerprinting. J Clin Invest 82:1532–1537, 1988.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Jeffreys AJ, Neumann R, Wilson V. Repeat unit sequence variation in minisatellites: A novel source of DNA polymorphism for studying variation and mutation by single molecule analysis. Cell 60:473–485, 1990.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Samowitz WS, Curtin K, Ma KN, et al: Microsatellite instability in sporadic colon cancre is associated with an improved prognosis at the population level. Cancer Epidem Biomarkers Prev 10:917–923, 2001.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. van Rhijn BWG, Lurkin I, Kirkels WJ, et al: Microsatellite analysis — DNA test in urine competes with cystoscopy in follow-up of superficial bladder carcinoma. Cancer 92:768–775, 2001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Han HJ, Yanagisawa A, Kato Y, et al: Genetic instability in pancreatic cancer and poorly differentiated type of gastric cancer. Cancer Res 53:5087–5089, 1993.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gonzalez R, Silva JM, Sanchez A, et al: Microsatellite alterations and TP53 mutations in plasma DNA of small cell lung cancer patients: Follow-up study and prognostic significance. Annals Oncol 11:1097–1104, 2000.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Contegiacomo A, Palmirotta R, De Marchis L, et al: Microsatellite instability and pathological aspects of breast cancer. Int J Cancer 64:264–268, 1995.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Vaurs-Barriere C, Penault-Llorca F, Laplace-Marieze V, et al: Low frequency of microsatellite instability in BRCA1 mutated breast tumors. J Med Genet 37:1–3, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chen P, Hurst T, Khoo SK. Detection of somatic DNA alterations in ovarian cancer by DNA fingerprint analysis. Cancer 67:1551–1555, 1991.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Fearon ER, Vogelstein B. Tumor suppressor and DNA repair gene defects in human cancer. In : Holland JF, Bast RC, Morton DL, Frei III E, Kufe DW Weichselbaum RR (eds). Cancer Medicine. 4. ed. Williams and Wilkins, 97–119, 1997.

  18. Alexander J, Watanabe T, Wu TT, et al: Histopathological identification of colon cancer with microsatellite instability. Am J Pathol 158:527–535, 2001.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Seripa D, Parrella P, Gallucci M, et al: Sensitive detection of transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder by microsatellite analysis of cells exfoliated in urine. Int J Cancer 95:364–369, 2001.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Rha SH, Dong SM, Jen J, et al. Molecular detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cervical carcinoma by microsatellite analysis of Papanicolaou smears. Int J Cancer 93:424–429, 2001.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Gonzalez-Zulueta M, Ruppert JM, et al: Microsatellite instability in bladder cancer. Cancer Res 53:5620–5623, 1993.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Sourvinos G, Kiaris H, Tsikkinis A, et al: Microsatellite instability and loss of heterozygosity in primary breast tumors. Tumor Biol 18:157–166, 1997.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Thibodeau SN, Bren G, Schaid D. Microsatellite instability in cancer of the proximal colon. Science 260:816–819, 1993.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Rush EB, Calvano JE, Van Zee KJ, et al: Microsatellite instability in breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 4:310–315, 1997.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Shaw JA, Walsh T, Chappell SA, et al: Microsatellite instability in early sporadic breast cancer. Br J Cancer 73:1393–1397, 1996.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kasami M, Vnencak-Jones CL, Manning S, et al: Loss of heterozygosity and microsatellite instability in breast hyperplasia. Am J Pathol 150:1925–1931, 1997.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Krajinovic M, Richer C, Gorska-Flipot I, et al: Genomic loci susceptible to replication errors in cancer cells. Br J Cancer 78:981–985, 1998.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nejat Dalay.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Demokan, S., Muslumanoglu, M., Yazici, H. et al. Investigation of microsatellite instability in Turkish breast cancer patients. Pathol. Oncol. Res. 8, 138–141 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03033724

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03033724

Keywords

Navigation