Skip to main content
Log in

Which women stop at one child in Australia?

  • Published:
Journal of Population Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The decline in fertility in Australia in the 1990s reflected both decreased first-order birth rates and decreased second-order birth rates (Kippen 2004). Whilst childlessness has been studied extensively, little attention has been paid to the progression from one to two children. This study analyses which women stop at one child using data from 1,809 parous 40–54 year olds from Wave 1 of the Household Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) survey. Important early lifecourse predictors of whether a woman stops her childbearing at one child are shown to be a woman s country of birth, highest level and type of schooling, and her father s occupation. A woman s marital status and her age at the time of the first birth are also shown to be significant predictors of her likelihood of not progressing to a second birth. The causes of trends over time are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbasi-Shavazi, M.J. and P. McDonald. 2000. Fertility and multiculturalism: immigrant fertility in Australia 1977–1991.International Migration Review 34(1):215–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). 1997.Australian Standard Classification of Occupations (ASCO) Second Edition. Catalogue Number 1220.0. Canberra.

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). 2003.Schools. Catalogue Number 4221.0. Canberra.

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). 2006a.Births 2005. Catalogue Number 3301.0. Canberra.

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). 2006b.Australian Historical Statistics. Catalogue Number 3105.0.65.001. Canberra.

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). 2006c.Marriages 2005. Catalogue Number 3306.0.55.001.

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). 2007.Australia at a Glance. Catalogue Number 1309.0. Canberra.

  • Avdeev, A. 2001. How fertility has fallen in Russia and the reasons for the fall. Paper presented to the IUSSP Seminar on International Perspectives on Low Fertility: Trends, Theories and Policies, Tokyo, 21–23 March.

  • Baird, M. 2005. Who s rocking the cradle?Making the Link 16: 32–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake, J. 1979. Is zero preferred? American attitudes towards childlessness in the 1970s.Journal of Marriage and the Family 41(May):245–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blake, J. 1989.Family Size and Achievement. Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bongaarts, J. and R.G. Potter. 1983.Fertility, Biology and Behavior. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breusch, T. and E. Gray. 2004. New estimates of mothers forgone earnings using HILDA data.Australian Journal of Labour Economics 7(2):125–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmichael. G.A. 1998. Things aint what they used to be! Demography, mental cohorts, morality and values in Post-War Australia.Journal of the Australian Population Association 15(2):91–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmichael, G.A. and P. McDonald. 2003. Fertility trends and differentials. Pp. 40–76 in S-E. Khoo and P. McDonald (eds),The Transformation of Australia s Population 1970–2030. Sydney: UNSW Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmichael, G.A. and A. Whittaker. 2007. Choice and circumstance: qualitative insights into contemporary childlessness in Australia.European Journal of Population 23(2):111–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, B., Y. Dunlop, M. Gray, A. Liu and D. Mitchell. 2001. The impact of children on the lifetime earnings of Australian women: evidence from the 1990s.Australian Economic Review 34(4):373–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craig, L. 2003. The time cost of children: a cross-national comparison of the interaction between time use and fertility rate. Paper presented to the 25th IATUR Conference on Time Use Research Comparing Time, Brussels, 17–19 September.

  • Craig, L. 2005.Where Do They Find the Time? Social Policy Research Centre Discussion Paper No 136. Sydney: UNSW.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, L. 2006. Parental education, time in paid work and time with children: an Australian time-diary analysis.British Journal of Sociology 57(4):553–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craig, L. and M. Bittman. 2003. The time costs of children in Australia. Paper presented to Rethinking Expenditures on Children: Towards an International Research Agenda, ANU, Canberra, 15–16 January.

  • Department of Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (DIMA). 2001.Immigration: Federation to Century s End. Canberra.

  • Department of Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (DIMA). 2006.Immigration Update. Canberra.

  • Department of Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (DIMIA). 2002.Australian Immigration Consolidated Statistics. Canberra.

  • De Vaus, D., L. Qu and R. Weston. 2005. The disappearing link between premarital cohabitation and subsequent marital stability 1971–2001.Journal of Population Research 22(2):99–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodson, L. 2004. The mother of all spending sprees.Sydney Morning Herald 12 May: 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fong, V.L. 2004.Only Hope: Coming of Age Under Chinas One-Child Policy. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenhalgh, S. 2003. Science, modernity and the making of China s one-child policy.Population and Development Review 29(2): 163–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heard, G. 2006. Pronatalism under Howard.People and Place 14(3): 12–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henman, P., R. Percival, A. Harding and M. Gray. 2007. Costs of children: research commissioned by the Ministerial Taskforce on Child Support.Occasional Paper No. 18. Canberra: Department of Families, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho, C. 2006. Migration as feminization? Chinese women s experiences of work and family in Australia.Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 32(3):497–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hugo, G.J. 2006. Immigration responses to global change in Asia: a review.Geographical Research 44(2): 155–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiernan, K.E. and A.J. Cherlin. 1999. Parental divorce and partnership dissolution in adulthood: evidence from a British cohort study.Population Studies 53(1): 39–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kippen, R. 2004. Declines in first and second birth rates and their effects on levels of fertility.People and Place 12(1): 28–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kippen, R. 2006. The rise of the older mother.People and Place 14(3): 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesthaeghe, R. 1995. The Second Demographic Transition in Western countries: an interpretation. Pp. 17–62 in K.O. Mason and A. Jensen (eds),Gender and Family Change in Industrialized Countries. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liefbroer, A.C. and E. Dourleijn. 2006. Unmarried cohabitation and union stability.Demography 43(2): 203–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marjoribanks, K. 2002.Family and School Capital: Towards a Context Theory of School Outcomes. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, G.N. 2006. Family size, family type and student achievement: cross-national differences.Journal of Comparative Family Studies 37(1): 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, P. 1998. Contemporary fertility patterns in Australia: first data from the 1996 census.People and Place 6(1): 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, P. 2001. Family support policy in Australia: the need for a paradigm shift.People and Place 9(2): 14–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, P. 2002. Low fertility: unifying the theory and the demography. Paper presented to the 2002 Annual Meeting of the Population Association of America, Atlanta, 9–11 May.

  • Merlo, R. and D. Rowland. 2000. The prevalence of childlessness in Australia.People and Place 8(2): 21–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, M. and L.B. Knudsen. 2002. The intergenerational transmission of fertility in contemporary Denmark: the effects of number of siblings (full and half), birth order, and whether male or female. Population Studies 56(3): 235–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, L.A. and G.J. Hugo. 2006. Women s fertility, religion and education in a low-fertility population: evidence from South Australia.Journal of Population Research 23(1): 41–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nie, Y. and R.J. Wyman. 2005. The one-child policy in Shanghai: acceptance and internalization.Population and Development Review 31(2): 313–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parr, N. 2005. Family background, schooling and childlessness in Australia.Journal of Biosocial Science 37(2): 229–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parr, N. 2006. Do children from small families do better?Journal of Population Research 24(1): 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parr, N. and F. Guo. 2005. The occupational concentration and mobility of Asian immigrants in Australia.Asian and Pacific Migration Review 14(3): 351–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parr, N. and M. Mok. 1995. Differences in the educational achievements, aspirations and values of birthplace groups in New South Wales.People and Place 3(2): 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Percival, R. and A. Harding. 2002. All they need is love and around $450,000. The AMP-NAT-SEM Income and Wealth Report Issue 3. Australia: AMP <http://www.amp.com.au/au/3column/0,2338,CH5306%255FSI56,00.html>. Accessed 25 January 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, J.A. 1992. Sterilization: past, present, future.Studies in Family Planning 23(3): 187–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santow, G. 1991. Trends in contraception and sterilization in Australia.Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetries and Gynaecology 31(3): 201–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Short, S.E., L. Ma and W. Yu. 2000. Birth planning and sterilization in China.Population Studies 54(3): 279–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sobotka, T. 2003. Re-emerging diversity: rapid fertility changes in Central and Eastern Europe after the collapse of the Communist regimes.Population (English Edition) 58(4–5): 451–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Population Division. 2006.World Population Policies 2005. New York.

  • Van de Kaa, D. 1997. Options and sequences: Europe s demographic patterns.Journal of the Australian Population Association 14(1): 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, N. and M. Wooden 2002a. The Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) Survey: Wave 1 survey methodology.Hilda Project Technical Paper Series No 1/2. <http://www.melbourneinstitute.com/hilda/>.Accessed 1 May 2007.

  • Watson, N. and M. Wooden 2002b. Assessing the quality of the HILDA Survey Wave 1 Data.Hilda Project Technical Paper Series No. 4/02. <http://www.melbourneinstitute.com/hilda/>.Accessed 20 August 2007.

  • Weston, R. and L. Qu. 2001. Men s and women s reasons for not having children.Family Matters 58(Autumn): 10–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weston, R., L. Qu, R. Parker and M. Alexander. 2004.It s Not for Lack of Wanting Kids … A Report on the Fertility Decision Making Project. Research Report No. 11. Melbourne: Australian Institute of Family Studies.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nick Parr.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Parr, N. Which women stop at one child in Australia?. Journal of Population Research 24, 207–225 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03031931

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03031931

Keywords

Navigation