Abstract
Purpose
A eutectic mixture of local anesthetics (EMLA) is commonly used to provide topical anesthesia for intravenous (iv) cannulation. One of its side effects is vasoconstriction, which may render cannulation more difficult. A gel formulation of amethocaine (Ametop™) is now commercially available. The aim of this study was to compare EMLA and Ametop™ with regard to the degree of topical anesthesia afforded, the incidence of vasoconstriction and the ease of iv cannulation.
Methods
Thirty two ASA 1 adult volunteers had a # 16 gauge iv cannula inserted on two separate occasions using EMLA and Ametop™ applied in a double blind fashion for topical anesthesia. Parameters that were recorded after each cannulation included visual analogue pain scores (VAPS), the presence of vasoconstriction and the ease of cannulation, graded as: 1 = easy, 2 = moderately difficult, 3 = difficult and 4 = failed.
Results
The mean VAPS ± SD after cannulation with Ametop™ M was 12 ± 9.9 and with EMLA was 25.3 ± 16.6 (P = 0.002). Vasoconstriction occurred after EMLA application on 17 occasions and twice after Ametop™ (P = 0.001). The grade of difficulty of cannulation was 1.44 ± 0.88 following EMLA and 1.06 ± 0.25 with Ametop™ (P = 0.023).
Conclusions
Intravenous cannulation was less painful following application of Ametop™ than EMLA. In addition, Ametop™ caused less vasoconstriction and facilitated easier cannulation. Its use as a topical anesthetic agent is recommended, especially when iv access may be problematic.
Résumé
Objectif
Un mélange eutectique d’anesthésiques locaux (MEAL) est souvent utilisé pour l’anesthésie topique lors d’une canulation intraveineuse (iv). La vasoconstriction, qui est l’un des effets secondaires du MEAL, peut compliquer la mise en place d’une canule. Une présentation en gel d’améthocaïne (Ametop™) est maintenant offerte dans le commerce. Le but de la présente étude était de comparer le MEAL et l’Ametop™ en regard du degré d’anesthésie topique fourni, de l’incidence de la vasoconstriction et de la facilité de la canulation iv. Méthode: On a inséré, en deux occasions séparées chez 32 volontaires adultes d’état physique ASA 1, une canuleiv de calibre 16 en utilisant en double aveugle le MEAL et Ametop™ pour réaliser l’anesthésie topique. Après chaque canulation, on a enregistré les paramètres suivants: les scores de douleur à l’échelle visuelle analogue (EVA), la présence de vasoconstriction et la facilité de canulation notée 1 = facile, 2 = modérément difficile, 3 = difficile et 4 = impossible.
Résultats
Les scores moyens à l’EVA ± l’écart type ont été de 12 ± 9,9 à la suite de la canulation avec Ametop™ M et de 25,3 ± 16,6 après le MEAL (P = 0,002). La vasoconstriction est survenue en 17 occasions après l’application du MEAL et deux fois plus souvent après Ametop™ (P = 0,001). Le degré de difficulté de canulation a été de 1,44 ± 0,88 après le MEAL et de 1,06 ± 0,25 après Ametop™ (P = 0,023).
Conclusion
La canulation intraveineuse est moins douloureuse après l’application d’Ametop™ que celle du MEAL. De plus, l’Ametop™ a provoqué moins de vasoconstriction et a facilité l’introduction d’une canule. Son usage comme anesthésique topique est recommandé, surtout lorsqu’une action rapide est nécessaire ou que l’accèsiv peut être problématique.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Harrison N, Langham BT, Bogod DG. Appropriate use of local anaesthetic for venous cannulation. Anaesthesia 1992; 47: 210–2.
Lee JJ, Rubin AP. EMLA cream and its current uses. Br J Hosp Med 1993; 50: 463–6.
Buckley MM, Benfield P. Eutectic lidocaine/prilocaine cream. A review of the topical anaesthetic/analgesic efficacy of a eutectic mixture of local anaesthetics (EMLA). Drugs 1993; 46: 126–51.
Juhlin L, Evers M. EMLA: a new topical anaesthetic. Adv Dermatol 1990; 5: 75–92.
Hallen B, Carlsson P, Uppfeldt A. Clinical study of a lignocaine-prilocaine cream to relieve the pain of venepuncture. Br J Anaesth 1985; 57: 326–8.
Sims C. Thickly and thinly applied lignocaine-prilocaine cream prior to venepuncture in children. Anaesth Intensive Care 1991; 19: 343–5.
Evers H, Von Dardel O, Juhlin L, Ohlsén L, Vinnars E. Dermal effects of compositions based on the eutectic mixture of lignocaine and prilocaine (EMLA). Br J Anaesth 1985; 57: 991–1005.
Bjerring P, Andersen PH, Arendt-Nielsen L. Vascular response of human skin after analgesia with EMLA cream. Br J Anaesth 1989; 63: 655–60.
Villada G, Zetlaoui J, Revuz J. Local blanching after epicutaneous application of EMLA cream. A doubleblind randomized study among 50 healthy volunteers. Dermatologica 1990; 181: 38–40.
Gunavardene RD, Davenport HT. Local application of EMLA and glyceryl trinitrate ointment before venepuncture. Anaesthesia 1990; 45: 52–4.
Coley S. Anaesthesia of the skin (Editorial). Br J Anaesth 1989; 62: 4–5.
Smith M, Gray BM, Ingram S, Jewkes DA. Doubleblind comparison of topical lignocaine-prilocaine cream (EMLA) and lignocaine infiltration for arterial cannulation in adults. Br J Anaesth 1990; 65: 240–2.
Watson AR, Szymkiw P, Morgan AG. Topical anaesthesia for fistula cannulation in haemodialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1988; 3: 800–2.
Strömbeck JO, Uggla M, Lillieborg S. Percutaneous anaesthesia with a lidocaine-prilocaine cream (EMLA) for cutting split-skin grafts. Eur J Plas Surg 1988; 11: 49–52.
Kapelushnik J, Koren G, Solh H, Greenberg M, DeVeber L. Evaluating the efficacy of EMLA in alleviating the pain associated with lumbar puncture; comparison of open and double blind protocols in children. Pain 1990; 42: 31–4.
De Waard-van der Spek FB, Oranje AP, Lillieborg S, Hop WCJ, Stolz E. Treatment of molluscum contagiosum using a lidocaine-prilocaine cream (EMLA) for analgesia. J Am Acad Dermotol 1990; 23: 685–8.
Rylander E, Sjöberg I, Lillieborg S, Stockman O. Local anesthesia of the genital mucosa with a lidocaineprilocaine cream (EMLA) for laser treatment of condylomata accuminata: a placebo-controlled study. Obstet Gynecol 1990; 75: 302–6.
Bingham B, Hawke M, Halik J. The safety and efficacy of Emla cream topical anesthesia for myringotomy and ventilation tube insertion. J Otolaryngol 1991; 20: 193–5.
Stow PJ, Glynn CJ, Minor B. EMLA cream in the treatment of post-herpetic neuralgia. Efficacy and pharmacokinetic profile. Pain 1989; 39: 301–5.
Sunderraj P, Kirby J, Joyce PW, Watson A. A double masked evaluation of lignocaine-prilocaine cream (EMLA) to alleviate the pain of retrobulbar injection. Br J Ophthalmol 1991; 75: 130–2.
McCafferty DF, Woolfson AD, Boston V.In vivo assessment of percutaneous local anaesthetic preparations. Br J Anaesth 1989; 62: 17–21.
Hung OR, Comeau L, Riley MR, Tan S, Whynot S, Mezei M. Comparative topical anaesthesia of EMLA and liposome-encapsulated tetracaine. Can J Anaesth 1997; 44: 707–11.
Doyle E, Freeman J, Im NT, Morton NS. An evaluation of a new self-adhesive patch preparation of amethocaine for topical anaesthesia prior to venous cannulation in children. Anaesthesia 1993; 48: 1050–2.
Molodecka J, Stenhouse C, Jones JM, Tomlinson A. Comparison of percutaneous anaesthesia for venous cannulation after topical application of either amethocaine or EMLA cream. Br J Anaesth 1994; 72: 174–6.
Jakobson B, Nilsson A. Methhaemoglobinemia associated with a prilocaine-lidocaine cream and trimetoprimsulphamethoxazole. A case report. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1985; 29: 453–5.
Hardwick N, King CM. Contact allergy to lignocaine with cross-reaction to bupivacaine. Contact Dermatitis 1994; 30: 245–6.
Engberg G, Danielson K, Henneberg S, Nilsson A. Plasma concentrations of prilocaine and lidocaine and methhaemoglobin formation in infants after epicutaneous application of a 5% lidocaine-prilocaine cream (EMLA). Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1987; 31: 624–8.
Wongprasartsuk P, Main BJ. Adverse local reactions to amethocaine cream — audit and case reports. Anaesth Intensive Care 1998; 26: 312–4.
Jackson CA. Amethocaine hydrochloride. Severe toxic effects when used for bronchoscopy. BMJ 1949; 1: 99–101.
Jenkins AV. Acute convulsive reaction to surface anaesthetic: treatment by depolarizing muscle relaxant. Br J Anaesth 1962; 34: 61–4.
Bonica JJ. Regional anesthesia with tetracaine. Anesthesiology 1950; 11: 606–22, 716–29.
Mazumdar B, Tomlinson AA, Faultier GC. Preliminary study to assay plasma amethocaine concentrations after topical application of a new local anaesthetic cream containing amethocaine. Br J Anaesth 1991; 67: 432–6.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Browne, J., Awad, I., Plant, R. et al. Topical amethocaine (Ametop™) is superior to EMLA for intravenous cannulation. Can J Anesth 46, 1014–1018 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03013194
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03013194