Skip to main content
Log in

Environmental persistence ofBacillus thuringiensis products tested under natural conditions againstThaumetopoea wilkinsoni

  • Entomology
  • Published:
Phytoparasitica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Information on persistence ofBacillus thuringiensis (Bt) is needed to improve the microbial pest management programs against the pine processionary mothThaumetopoea wilkinsoni in pine forests in Israel. The persistence of the microbe under natural conditions of rain and sunlight was evaluated and is documented here for the first time. Pine saplings were sprayed with three commercialBt products, Foray 48B, Delfin WG and Dipel DF, all used at 32,000 IU mg−1 in a formulation with 1% (w/v) of condensed milk. In experiments conducted in November and December of 2004, the saplings were either exposed to rain and sunlight or were sheltered to avoid these environmental factors. The lowest rainfall recorded in the 8-day experiments was 16.5 mm (test 2) and the heaviest was 71.1 mm (test 1). Solar irradiation ranged from 9.4 to 10.9 MJ m−2. The minimum temperature was close to 10°C and the maximum was less than 23°C. Needles of the treated saplings and their controls were sampled after 0, 1, 5 and 8 days, and were fed to 1st or 2nd instar larvae. Dipel DF persisted better than Delfin WG and still retained its initial activity of 80–100% mortality on day 8 at low rainfall (test 2). Dripping ofBt from upper to lower branches was quantified with the larval bioassays. The milk formulation proved to be an effective rain-fasting adjuvant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brar, S.K., Verma, M., Tyagi, R.D., Valero, J.R. and Surampalli, R.Y. (2006) Screening of different adjuvants for wastewater/wastewater sludge-basedBacillus thuringiensis formulations.J. Econ. Entomol. 90:1065–1079.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Burges, H. (1998) Formulations of Microbial Pesticides. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Demolin, G. and Martin, J. (1998) Control of pine-tree processionary caterpillar. Effectiveness and persistence of the activity of two formulations based onBacillus thuringiensis.Phytoma 507:11–14.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Halperin, J. (1985) Effect of site factors on the population dynamics of the pine processionary caterpillar.Proc. IUFRO Conf. on Site Characteristics and Population Dynamics of Lepidopteran and Hymenopteran Forest Pests (Dornoch, Scotland, 1980), pp. 104–109.

  5. Moore, I., Halperin, J. and Navon, A. (1962) Laboratory and field trials in the bacterial control of the processionary caterpillarThaumetopoea wilkinsoni Tams withBacillus thuringiensis var.thuringiensis Berliner.Isr. J. Agric. Res. 12:167–174.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Morris, O. (1983) Protection ofBacillus thuringiensis from inactivation by sunlight.Can. Entomol. 115:1215–1227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Navon, A. (1993) Control of lepidopteran pests withBacillus thuringiensis.in: Entwhistle, P., Cory, J., Bailey, M. and Higgs, S. [Eds.]Bacillus thuringiensis, an Environmental Biopesticide: Theory and Practice. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK. pp. 125–146.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Navon, A. (2000) Bioassays ofBacillus thuringiensis products used against agricultural pests.in: Navon, A. and Ascher, K.R.S. [Eds.] Bioassays of Entomopathogenic Microbes and Nematodes. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK. pp. 25–40.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pozsgay, M., Fast, P., Kaplan, H. and Carey, P. (1987) The effect of sunlight on the protein crystals fromBacillus thuringiensis var.kurstaki HD1 and NRD12: A Raman spectroscopic study.J. Invertebr. Pathol. 50:246–253.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Pusztai, M., Fast, P., Gringorten, L., Kaplan, H., Lessard, T. and Carey, P. (1991) The mechanism of sunlight mediated inactivation ofBacillus thuringiensis crystals.Biochem. J. 273:43–47.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. SAS Institute (2002). SAS/STAT User’s Guide, version 6.11. Vols. 1&2. SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  12. van Frankenhuyzen K. (2000) Application ofBacillus thuringiensis in forestry.in: Charles, J.F., Delécluse, A. and Nielsen-LeRoux, C. [Eds.] Entomopathogenic Bacteria: From Laboratory to Field Application. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, the Netherlands. pp. 371–379.

    Google Scholar 

  13. van Frankenhuyzen, K. and Nystrom, C. (1989) Residual toxicity of a high potency formulation ofBacillus thuringiensis to spruce budworm.J. Econ. Entomol. 82:868–872.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Z. Mendel.

Additional information

http://www.phytoparasitica.org posting May 4, 2007.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gindin, G., Navon, A., Saphir, N. et al. Environmental persistence ofBacillus thuringiensis products tested under natural conditions againstThaumetopoea wilkinsoni . Phytoparasitica 35, 255–263 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02981159

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02981159

Key words

Navigation