Skip to main content
Log in

Biofilm detection and the clinical significance ofStaphylococcus epidermidis isolates

  • Published:
Folia Microbiologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The ability ofStaphylococcus epidermidis to produce biofilm was compared in 147 clinically significant strains repeatedly isolated from blood cultures of patients with bloodstream infection and in 147 strains isolated from skin. The strains were examined for the presence ofica operone, for the ability to form biofilm by Christensen’s test-tube method and for the production of slime by Congo Red agar method. Theica operone was found in 92 (62.6 %) blood isolates and in 44 (29.9) isolates from skin. Christensen’s test-tube method was positive in 79 (53.7) and 33 (22.4), Congo Red agar method in 64 (43.5) and 31 (21.1) of blood and skin isolates, respectively. All three methods were more frequently positive in clinically significant isolates from blood than in strains isolated from skin. The detection ofica operone and the Christensen’s test-tube method showed better correlation with the clinical significance than the Congo Red agar method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baldassarri L., Simpson W.A., Donelli G., Christensen G.D.: Variable fixation of staphylococcal slime by different histochemical fixatives.Eur.J.Clin.Microbiol.Infec.Dis. 12, 866–868 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen G.D., Simpson W.A., Bisno A.L., Beachey E.H.: Adherence of slime-producing strains ofStaphylococcus epidermidis to smooth surfaces.Infect.Immun. 37, 318–326 (1982).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Costerton J.W., Stewart P.S., Greenberg E.P.: Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections.Science 284, 1318–1322 (1999).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • von Eiff C., Heilmann C., Peters G.: New aspects in the molecular basis of polymer-associated infections due to staphylococci.Eur.J.Clin.Microbiol.Infect.Dis. 18, 843–846 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frebourg N.B., Lefebvre S., Baert S., Lemeland J.F.: PCR-based assay for discrimination between invasive and contaminatingStaphylococcus epidermidis strains.J.Clin.Microbiol. 38, 877–880 (2000).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Preeman D.J., Falkiner F.R., Keane C.T.: New method for detecting slime production by coagulase negative staphylococci.J.Clin.Pathol. 42, 872–874 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu J.C., Nelson B.: Multiple comparisons in the general linear model.J.Comput.Graphic.Statist. 7, 23–41 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knobloch J.K., Horstkotte M.A., Rohde H., Mack D.: Evaluation of different detection methods of biofilm formation inStaphylococcus aureus.Med.Microbiol.Immunol. 191, 101–106 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis K.: Riddle of biofilm resistance.Antimicrob.Agents Chemother. 45, 999–1007 (2001).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mack D., Fischer W., Krokotsch A., Leopold K., Hartmann R., Egge H., Laufs R.: The intercellular adhesin involved in biofilm accumulation ofStaphylococcus epidermidis is a linear β-1,6-linked glucosaminoglycan: purification and structural analysis.J.Bacteriol. 178, 175–183 (1996).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martineau F., Picard F.J., Roy P.H., Ouellette M., Bergeron M.G.: Species-specific and ubiquitous DNA-based assays for rapid identification ofStaphylococcus epidermidis.J.Clin.Microbiol. 34, 2888–2893 (1996).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mulder J.G., Degener J.E.: Slime-producing properties of coagulase negative staphylococci isolated from blood cultures.Clin.Microbiol.Infect. 4, 689–694 (1998).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’Gara J.P., Humphreys H.:Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms: importance and implications.J.Med.Microbiol. 50, 582–587 (2001).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paterson R.L., Webster N.R.: Sepsis and the systemic inflammatory response syndrome.J.Roy.Coll.Surg.Edinburgh 45, 178–182 (2000).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Raad I.: Intravascular-catheter-related infections.Lancet 351, 893–898 (1998).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sherertz R.J., Raad I.I., Belani A., Koo L.C., Rand K.H., Pickett D.L., Straub S.A., Fauerbach L.L.: Three-year experience with sonicated vascular catheter cultures in a clinical microbiology laboratory.J.Clin.Microbiol. 28, 76–82 (1990).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vandecasteele S.J., Peetermans W.E., Merckx R.R., Rijnders B.J., Van Eldere J.: Reliability of theica, aap andatlE genes in the discrimination between invasive, colonizing and contaminantStaphylococcus epidermidis isolates in the diagnosis of catheter-related infections.Clin.Microbiol.Infect. 9, 114–119 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel L., Sloos J.H., Spaargaren J., Suiker I., Dijkshoorn L.: Biofilm production byStaphylococcus epidermidis isolates associated with catheter related bacteremia.Diagn.Microbiol.Infect.Dis. 36, 139–141 (2000).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Woznicová V., Votava M., Skalka B.: Comparison of 2 methods of detecting slime production by coagulase-negative staphylococci. (In Czech)Epidemiol.Mikrobiol.Imunol. 42, 51–53 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu K.D., McFeters G.A., Stewart P.S.: Biofilm resistance to antimicrobial agents.Microbiology 146, 547–549 (2000).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Růžička.

Additional information

This work was supported by grant no. 6818-3/2001 from theInternal Grant Agency of the Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Růžička, F., Holá, V., Votava, M. et al. Biofilm detection and the clinical significance ofStaphylococcus epidermidis isolates. Folia Microbiol 49, 596–600 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02931540

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02931540

Keywords

Navigation