Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

History and utilization ofRosa damascena

  • Published:
Economic Botany Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This report traces the historical literature on the development of the damask rose industry. It begins with a sadly sparse fossil and archaeologic record and continues to the present. The perfection of methods for the production of attar and rose water fromRosa damascena is reviewed, as are cultural practices and current research programs.

The various arguments to explain the evolution ofRosa damascena are presented along with accessory information needed to evaluate them critically. Evidence is presented to support the theory thatR. damascena was originally an eastern Mediterranean hybrid betweenR. gallica andR. Phoenicia.

It is unfortunate that so few botanists have been willing to study this domesticate, as too many horticulturists have been concerned only with cultivation and higher yields. Most of the current literature on this species is either inaccessible, because of language or general unavailability, or of a popular nature and therefore difficult to evaluate. It is hoped that this review will encourage more research on industrial roses and aid those who wish to search the literature. May it also suggest to crop evolutionists that much work remains to be done on the subject of the domestication of ornamental and medicinal plants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Anonymous. 1895. Review ofThe Book of the Rose andThe Rose-Garden. Quart. Rev. 182: 110-125.

  • Astadjov, N. S. 1975a. Studies on the clones from the population of Kazanlik Rose (Rosa damascenaMiller). Rivista Italiana Essenza, Profumi, Piante Officinali, Olii Vegetali, Saponi 57: 623–626.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1975b. A new variety of the Kazanlik oil-bearing rose, Iskra. Rasteniev. Nauki 12: 59–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balinova-Tsevtkova, Y. M., and R. Atanassova. 1974. A method for determination of rose oil composition in a single flower of the Kazanlik rose. Dokl. Sel’skokhoz. Akad. Sofia 7: 45–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H. F. 1963. The fossil record of the genusRosa. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 90: 99–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billiard, R. 1928. L’Agriculture dans I’antiquié d’après les Géorgiques de Vergile. pp. 518–520. E. de Boccard, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boissier, E. 1872. Flora Orientalis. Vol. ii. H. George, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulenger, G. A. 1932. Les roses d’Europe de l’Herbier Crépin. Bull. Jard. Bot. État 12: 193–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1933. Revision des roses d’Asie de la section des Synstylae. Bull. Jard. Bot. État 9: 211–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1936. Revision des roses d’Asie. Bull. Jard. Bot. État 14: 115–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bredemann, G. 1917. The otto of rose industry in Asiatic Turkey. Bericht Schimmel Apr–Oct: 45.

  • Bulgaria-Tsentralno Statistichesko Upravlenie. 1969. Vunshna na turgoviia: Narodna Republika Bulgaria Statisticheski Danni 1939–1968. Sophia.

  • -. 1972. Vunshna na turgoviia: Narodna Republika Bulgaria Statisticheski Danni 1939–1971. Sophia.

  • Casparie, W. A., B. Mook-Kamps, R. M. Palfenier-Vegter, P. C. Struijk, and W. van Zeist. 1977. The paleobotany of Swifterbant. Helenium 17: 28–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chechelashvili, E. V., and I. N. Korinteli. 1971. Specification of recipes and waste standards for rakhat-lukhum manufacturing. Trudy Gruzinskii Nauchno-Issledovatel’skii Institut Pishchevoi Promyshlennosti 4: 321–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Columella, L. J. M. Ca. 50 A.D. De Re Rustica. Translated by H. Boyd, 1941. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crépin, F. 1879. Primitiae monographiae rosarum. Materiaux pour servir ã l’histoire des roses. Bull. Bot. Soc. Belg. 18: 221–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darlington, C. D. 1973. Chromosome Botany and the Origin of Cultivated Plants. 3rd ed. pp. 196–205. Hafner, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, and A. P. Wylie. 1955. Chromosome Atlas of Flowering Plants. pp. 134–139. George Allen & Unwin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darnton, J. 1980. Bulgaria’s rare rose oil for perfumes may be rarer after a bad winter. New York Times. 26 June 1980, p. A10.

  • Devlet Istatistik Enstitüsü. 1974. Aylik dişs ticaret istatistikleri. Turkey Monthly Foreign Trade Statistics.

  • Dioscorides. Ca. 50 A.D. The Greek Herbal of Dioscorides. Translated by J. Goodyer, 1655. R. T. Gunther, ed., 1933. Hafner, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emboden, W. A. 1978. The sacred narcotic lily of the Nile:Nymphaea caerulea. Econ. Bot. 32: 395–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, and H. Lewis. 1967. Terpenes as taxonomic characters inSalvia section Audibertia. Brittonia 19: 152–160.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Erlanson, E. W. 1938. Phylogeny and polyploidy inRosa. New Phytol. 37: 72–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, A. J. 1901. The palace of Minos. Monthly Rev. 2: 115–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farley, J. L. 1862. The Resources of Turkey. p. 47. Longman, Green, Longman & Roberts, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flückinger, F. A. 1867. Documente zur Geschichte der Pharmacie. Halle.

  • Font Quer, P. 1973. Plantas medicinales el Dioscorides renovado. Editorial Labor, Barcelona.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner, L. 1970. Roses of Bulgaria. Contemp. Rev. 211: 101–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garnero, J. 1976. Sur la composition des huiles essentielles et absolues de rose bulgare (Rosa damascena Mill.). Revue de la littérature. Revista Italiana Essenza, Profumi, Piante Officinali, Olii Vegetali, Saponi 58: 548–552.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —, G. Guichard, and P. Buil. 1976. L’huile essentielle et la concrete de rose de Turquie. Rivista Italiana Essenza, Profumi, Piante Officinali, Olii Vegetali, Saponi 58: 160–179.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gilad, D. E. 1975. Roses in Israel. Amer. Rose Annual 60: 10–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, J. 1953. Pageant of the Rose. Studio Publ., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1968. The Art of Cooking with Roses. Noonday Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grieve, M. 1931. A Modern Herbal. Hafner, New York. 3rd printing with new index, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guenther, E. 1952. The Essential Oils. Vol. V., pp. 3–38. Van Nostrand, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegi, G. 1923. Illustrierte Flora von Mittel-Europa. Vol. 4. J. F. Lehmann, Munich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herodotus. Ca. 500 B.C. The history of Herodotus. Translated by G. Rawlinson, 1930. J. M. Dent, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollick, A. A. 1936. The tertiary flora of Alaska. U.S. Geol. Surv. Profess. Paper #182.

  • Hurst, C. C. 1941. Notes on the origin and evolution of our garden roses. I. Ancient garden roses (2000 B.C. to A.D. 1800). J. Roy. Hort. Soc. 66: 73–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurst, R. 1967. The Minoan roses. Rose Annual 59-65.

  • Ibn Khaldum. Ca. 1400 A.D. The Muqaddimah; an Introduction to History. Translated by F. Ros-enthal, 1967. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Igolen, G. 1966. The turkish rose. Soaps, Perfumery & Cosmetics 39: 461–471.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Isaac, E. 1970. Geography of Domestication, p. 114. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Istakhri. 1754. Das Buch der Länder. Ed. Mordmann, Hamburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jashemski, W. F. 1963. The flower industry at Pompeii. Archaeol. 16: 112–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, P. R., and J. H. Cock. 1977. Centres of origin of crops and their productivity. Econ. Bot. 31: 51–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joret, C. 1894. Les Jardins dans l’ancienne Égypte. Imp. Marchessou Fils, Le Puy.

  • Josifović, M. 1972. Flora of Serbia. Vol. 4, pp. 54-55. Beograd.

  • Komarov, V. L. 1940. Flora of the USSR. Vol. 10, pp. 322–363. Israel Program for Scientific Translations, Jerusalem.

    Google Scholar 

  • Komitet po Kachestucta Standartizatsiyata i Metrologiyata. 1972. Bulgarian Standard BDS 9375–72. Sophia.

  • Krüssmann, G. 1977. The rose in art and history. Rose Annual 67-77.

  • Kupenov, L. G., E. V. Georgiev, G. P. Ganchev, and P. G. Boyadziev. 1971. Dokl. Bulg. Akad. Nauk 24: 1345.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Landsberger, B., and O. R. Gurney. 1958. Practical vocabulary of Assur. Archiv für Orientforschung 18: 328–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindley, J. 1820. Rosarum Monographia; or, a Botanical History of Roses. J. Ridgeway, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandenova, I. P. 1970. A revision ofRosa in Turkey. Notes Roy. Bot. Gard. Edinburgh 30: 327–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manucci, N. Ca. 1680. History of the Mogul Dynasty in India. Translated by F. Catrou, 1826. J. M. Richardson, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martialis, M. V. Ca. 100 A.D. Epigrams. Translated by W. Ker, 1919. Heinemann, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mas-Guindal, J., and A. Mas-Guindal. 1944. Plantas Productoras de Esencias, Resinas y sus Derivados. Seccion de Publicaciones, Prensa y Propaganda, Madrid.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milewski, J. 1975. New varieties of fruit roses. Nowe odmiany róž owocowych. Sylwan 119: 61–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • -, and S. Mrozewski. 1958. Ptatki kwiatów róžy surovcem aromatychnosmakowym wprzemyśle spožywczym. Przemysl Spožywczy #10/11/12.

  • Naves, Y. R., and G. Mazuyer. 1947. Natural Perfume Materials. Translated by E. Sagarin. Reinhold, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nazerenko, L. G. 1974. The best kinds of aromatic rose. Luchshie sorta rozi efirnomaslichnoi. Vsesoiuzn. Nauchno-Issl. Inst. Efirnomaslichnykh 7: 14–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newberry, P. E. 1889. On the vegetable remains discovered in the cemetery at Hawara.In W. M. Flinders Petrie. Hawara, Biahmu, and Arsinoe. pp. 46–53. Field & Tuer, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, Ö. 1972.Rosa.In P. H. Davis, ed. Flora of Turkey and the Aegean Islands, Vol. 4. pp. 106–128. Univ. Press, Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orozoff, P. I. 1906. The Rose—Its History. P. I. Orozoff et fils, Kazanlik, Bulgaria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pal, B. P. 1966. The Rose in India. pp. 179–182. Indian Council Agric. Research, New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, W. W., R. W. Scora, and J. Kumamoto. 1972. The volatile oils ofAmbrosia (Compositae: Ambrosieae). Brittonia 24: 189–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, E. J. 1925. Perry’s Cyclopaedia of Perfumery. J. & A. Churchill, London. Vol. 2, pp. 630–664.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pliny. Ca. 50 A.D. Natural History. Translated by J. Bastock and H. T. Riley, 1855. Henry G. Bohn, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Post, G. E. 1932. Flora of Syria, Palestine and Sinai. 2nd ed. J. E. Dinsmore, ed. Vol. 1, pp. 458–461. American Press, Beirut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravndal, G. B. 1926. Turkey: a commercial and industrial handbook. U.S. Dept. Commerce, Trade Promotion Series #28. Govt. Printing Office, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rehder, A. 1940. A Manual of Cultivated Trees and Shrubs Hardy in North America. 2nd ed. pp. 426–435. Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renfrew, J. M. 1973. Paleoethnobotany. The Prehistoric Food Plants of the Near East and Europe. p. 150. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rochlin, R. P. 1957. Die Wirtschaft Bulgariens seit 1945. Deutsches Institute für Wirtschaftsforschung, Berlin. Sonderhefte #38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowley, G. D. 1967. Chromosome studies and evolution inRosa. Bull. Jard. Bot. Nat. Belg. 37: 45–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawer, J. C. 1894. Rhodologia. A Discourse on Roses and the Odour of Rose. W. J. Smith, Brighton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, R. E. 1954. History of the Rose. Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L. W. 1973. The Forgotten Art of Flower Cookery. Harper & Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staykov, V. 1971. Some oil-bearing species of the genusRosa. Dokl. Sel’skokhoz. Akad. Sofia 4: 199–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suetonius. Ca. 150 A.D. Nero.In The Lives of the Caesars. Book VI. Translated by J. C. Rolfe, 1959. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suzuka, O. 1953. Chromosome numbers in pharmaceutical plants II. Rep. Kihara Inst. Biol. Res. 6: 79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tackholm, G. 1922. Zytologische Studien über die GattungRosa. Acta Horti Berg. 7: 97–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theophrastus. Ca. 300 B.C. Enquiry into Plants, and Concerning Odours. Translated by A. Hort, 1916. Heinemann, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, G. S. 1955. The Old Shrub Roses. Phoenix House, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • -. 1964. Damask roses. A group of the old shrub roses. Rose Annual 37-41.

  • Thompson, R. C. 1949. A Dictionary of Assyrian Botany. British Academy, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Topalov, V., and I. Irintchev. 1967. Rose Production in Bulgaria. Plovdiv.

  • Tschirch, A. 1917. Handbuch der Pharmakognosie. Vol. 2, pp. 791–816. Verlag von Chr. H. Tauchnitz, Leipzig.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S.D.A. 1960. Index of Plant Diseases in the United States. Agric. Handbook #165, Washington, DC.

  • Varro, M. T. Ca. 50 B.C. Rerum Rusticarum Libri (On Farming). Translated by L. Storr-Best, 1912. G. Bell & Sons, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vurkhoven Suvet po Standartizasiya. 1970. Bulgarian Standard BDS 804-70. Sophia.

  • Wilkes, H. G. 1970. Teosinte introgression in the maize of the Nobogame Valley. Bot. Mus. Leafl. Harvard Univ. 22: 297–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willmott, E. 1912. The genusRosa. Vol. XIX. John Murray, London. (The rose illustrations are most beautiful.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wylie, A. P. 1954. The history of garden roses I. J. Roy. Hort. Soc. 79: 555–571.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zavarin, E., L. Lawrence, and M. C. Thomas. 1971. Compositional variations of leaf monoterpenes inCupressus macrocarpa, C. pygmaea, C. goveniana, C. abramsiana andC. sargentii. Phytochemistry 10: 379–393.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Horticultural Science and Landscape Architecture, University of Minnesota, 55108, St. Paul, MN

    Mark P. Widrlechner

Authors
  1. Mark P. Widrlechner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Widrlechner, M.P. History and utilization ofRosa damascena . Econ Bot 35, 42–58 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02859214

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02859214

Keywords

Search

Navigation