Skip to main content
Log in

Ecological constraints on the grouping of wild orang-utans (Pongo pygmaeus) in the Gunung Leuser National Park, Sumatra, Indonesia

  • Published:
International Journal of Primatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The orang-utan (Pongo pygmaeus)is an interesting subject on which to base an evaluation of the costs and benefits of social life in apes, since grouping in this heavy, arboreal frugivore is facultative. In the Ketambe area of Sumatra, Indonesia, the food sources of wild orang-utans display a clear seasonality. The two main food types— figs and other, nonfig, fruits— fulfill different functions. The huge fig trees meet the high caloric requirements of the ape and are therefore visited regularly throughout the year. Nonfig fruits are an additional food source but become a really important alternative when figs are in short supply. Since fig trees are relatively rare, it is only in the nonfig fruiting season that food is relatively abundant. Two types of orang-utan groupings could be distinguished. During lean periods, groups formed in the few productive fig trees available can be explained as forced aggregations taking place in spite of centrifugal forces caused by competition. Only when a temporary surfeit of food slackens these centrifugal forces (i.e., during the fruit season) does the tendency to form spontaneous social groups (the second type of grouping) reveal itself. It is suggested that the development of social skills is an important aspect of grouping in adolescent orang-utans. For the adult male, safeguarding his reproductive success by protecting females against sexually aggressive subadult males is probably the only reason for being in groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdulhadi, R., and Kartawinata, K. (1982). The pattern of forest vegetation in the Ketambe Research Station, Gn. Leuser National Park (unpublished report to LBN-LIPI; in Indonesian).

  • Galdikas, B. M. F. (1978).Orangutan Adaptation at Tanjung Puting Reserve, Central Borneo, Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galdikas, B. M. F. (1979). Orangutan adaptation at Tanjung Puting Reserve: Mating and ecology. In Hamburg, D. A., and McCown, E. R. (eds.),The Great Apes, Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Park, Calif., pp. 194–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galdikas, B. M. F. (1980). Living with orangutans.Natl. Geograph. 157(6): 830–852.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghiglieri, M. P. (1984). Feeding ecology and sociality of chimpanzees in Kibale Forest, Uganda. In Rodman, P. S., and Cant, J. G. H. (eds.),Adaptations for Foraging in Nonhuman Primates: Contributions to an Organismal Biology of Prosimians, Monkeys, and Apes, Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 161–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, W. D. (1971). Geometry of the selfish herd.J. Theor. Biot. 31: 295–311.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kawai, M. (1965). Newly acquired pre-cultural behaviour of the natural troop of Japanese monkeys of Koshima Islet.Primates 6: 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, J. R. (1974). The behaviour and ecology of wild orang-utans(Pongo pygmaeus).Anim. Behav. 22: 3–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, J. R. (1979). Reproductive behavior in wild orangutan populations. In Hamburg, D. A., and McCown, E. R. (eds.).The Great Apes, Benjamin/Cummins, Menlo Park, Calif, pp. 194–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulliam, H. R. (1973). On the advantage of flocking.J. Theor. Biol. 38: 419–422.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rijksen, H. D. (1978).A Field Study on Sumatran Orang Utans (Pongo pygmaeus abeliiLesson 1827). Ecology, Behaviour and Conservation, Ph.D. thesis, Agricultural University, Wageningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodman, P. S. (1973). Population composition and adaptive organization among orangutans of the Kutai Reserve. In Michael, R. P., and Crook, J. H. (eds.).Ecology and Behavior of Primates, Academic Press, London, pp. 171–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schürmann, C. L. (1981). Courtship and mating behaviour of wild orangutans in Sumatra. In Chiarelli, A. B., and Corrucini, R. S. (eds.),Primate Behavior and Sociobiology, Springer, Berlin, pp. 130–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schürmann, C. L. (1982). Mating behaviour of wild orangutans. In de Boer, L. E. M. (ed.),Biology and Conservation of the Orang Utan, Junk, The Hague, pp. 271–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schürmann, C. L., and van Hooff, J. A. R. A. M. (1986). Reproductive strategies of the orangutan: New data and a reconsideration of existing socio-sexual models.Int. J. Primatol. 7: 265–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, S. (1956).Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R. R., and Rohlf, F. J. (1969).Biometry, Freeman, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugardjito, J. (1983). Selecting nest-sites of Sumatran orang-utans,Pongo pygmaeus abelii, in the Gunung Leuser National Park, Indonesia.Primates 24: 467–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terborgh, J. (1983).Five New World Primates, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treisman, M. (1975). Predation and the evolution of gregariousness. I. Models for concealment and evasion.Anim. Behav. 23: 779–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Schaik, C. P. (1983). Why are diurnal primates living in groups?Behaviour 87: 120–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Schaik, C. P. (1986). Phenological changes in a Sumatran rainforest.J. Tropical Ecol. 2: 327–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Schaik, C. P. and van Hooff, J. A. R. A. M. (1983). On the ultimate causes of primate social systems.Behaviour 85: 91–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Schaik, C. P., van Noordwijk, M. A., Warsono, B., and Sutriono, E. (1983). Party size and early detection of predators in Sumatran forest primates.Primates 24: 211–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vellayan, S. (1981).Chemical Composition and Digestability of Natural and Domestic Food of the Lar Gibbon (Hylobates lar)in Malaysia, M.Sc. thesis, University Pertanian Malaysia, Serdang, Selangor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, P., and Zahavi, A. (1973). The importance of certain assemblages of birds as “information centres” for food-finding.Ibis 115: 517–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheatley, B. P. (1982). Energetics of foraging inMacaca fascicularis andPongo pygmaeus and a selective advantage of large body size in the orang-utan.Primates 23: 348–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wrangham, P. W. (1977). Feeding behaviour of Chimpanzees in Gombe National Park, Tanzania. In Clutton-Brock, T. H. (ed.),Primate Ecology, Academic Press, London, pp. 504–538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrangham, R. W. (1986). Ecology and social relationships in two species of chimpanzee. In Runenstein, D. I., and Wrangham, R. W. (eds.),Ecology and Evolution: Birds and Mammals, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sugardjito, J., te Boekhorst, I.J.A. & van Hooff, J.A.R.A.M. Ecological constraints on the grouping of wild orang-utans (Pongo pygmaeus) in the Gunung Leuser National Park, Sumatra, Indonesia. Int J Primatol 8, 17–41 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02737112

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02737112

Key words

Navigation