Skip to main content
Log in

Study of variational inequality and equality formulations for elastostatic frictional contact problems

  • Published:
Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

An overview ofvariational inequality andvariational equality formulations for frictionless contact and frictional contact problems is provided. The aim is to discuss the state-of-the-art in these two formulations and clearly point out their advantages and disadvantages in terms of mathematical completeness and practicality. Various terms required to describe the contact configuration are defined.Unilateral contact law and classical Coulomb’s friction law are given.Elastostatic frictional contact boundary value problem is defined. General two-dimensional frictionless and frictional contact formulations for elastostatic problems are investigated. An example problem of a two bar truss-rigid wall frictionless contact system is formulated as an optimization problem based on the variational inequality approach. The problem is solved in a closed form using the Karush-Kuhn-Tucker (KKT) optimality conditions. The example problem is also formulated as a frictional contact system. It is solved in the closed form using a new two-phase analytical procedure. The procedure avoids use of the incremental/iterative techniques and user defined parameters required in a typical implementation based on the variational equality formulation. Numerical solutions for the frictionless and frictional contact problems are compared with the results obtained by using a general-purpose finite element program ANSYS (that uses variational equality formulation). ANSYS results match reasonably well with the solutions of KKT optimality conditions for the frictionless contact problem and the two-phase procedure for the frictional contact problem. The validity of the analytical formulation for frictional contact problems (with one contacting node) is verified. Thevariational equality formulation for frictionless and frictional, contact problems is also studied in detail. The incremental/iterative Newton-Raphson scheme incorporating the penalty approach is utilized. Studies are conducted to provide insights for the numerical solution techniques. Based on the present study it is concluded that alternate formulations and computational procedures need to be developed for analysis of frictional contact problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Agelet de Saracibar, C. (1998), “Numerical analysis of coupled thermomechanical frictional contact problems. Computational model and applications”,Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering,5, 243–301.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Agelet de Saracibar, C. and Chiumenti, M. (1999), “On the numerical modeling of frictional wear phenomenon”,Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering,177, 401–426.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Alart, P. (1992), “A simple contact algorithm applied to large sliding and anisotropic friction”, InProceedings: Contact Mechanics, International Symposium Curnier, A. (Ed.), Lausanne, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Alart, P. and Curnier A. (1991), “A mixed formulation for frictional contact problems prone to Newton like solution methods”,Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering,92, 353–375.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Arora, J.S., Chahande, A.I. and Paeng, J.K. (1991), “Multiplier methods for engineering optimization”,International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering,32, 1485–1525.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Bathe, K.J. (1996), “Finite Element Procedures”, Prentice-Hall Inc., New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bathe, K.J. and Chaudhary, A. (1985), “A solution method for planar and axisymmetric contact problems”,International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering,21, 65–88.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Bendsøe, M.P., Olhoff, N. and Taylor, J.E. (1991), “A unified approach to the analysis and design of elasto-plastic structures with mechanical contact”, InOptimization of Large Structural Systems, Lecture Notes, Prof. George Rozvany, Essen University, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cook, R.D., Malkus, D.S. and Plesha, M.E. (1989), “Concepts and applications of finite element analysis”, John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Curnier, A. (1984), “A theory of friction”,Int. J. Solids Stru,20, (7), 637–647.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Giannakopoulos, A.E. (1989), “The return mapping method for the integration of friction constitutive relations”,Computers and Structures,32, 157–167.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Gill, P.E. (1981),Practical Optimization, Academic, Press, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Goldsmith, W. (1960), “Impact: The Theory and Physical Behavior of Colliding Solids”, Edward Arnold, London.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hallquist, J.O. (1991), “LS-DYNA 3D Theoretical Manual”, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.

  15. Hallquist, J.O., Goudreau, G.L. and Benson, D.J. (1985), “Sliding interfaces with contact impact in large-scale lagrangian computations”,Comp. Meths. Appl. Mech. Engng.,51, 107–137.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Haug, E., Chand, R. and Pan, K. (1977), “Multibody elastic contact analysis by quadratic programming”,Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications,21, 189–198.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Heegaard, J.-H. and Curnier, A. (1993), “An augmented lagrangian method for discrete large-slip contact problems”,International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering,36, 569–593.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Heege, A. and Alart, P. (1996), “Africtional contact element for strongly curved contact problems”,International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering,39, 165–184.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Hertz, H. (1881), “Über die Berührung fester elastischen Körper”,Journal der Reinen und Angewandten Mathematik,92, 156–171.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hertz, H. (1882), “Über die Berührung fester elastischen Körper und über die Härte”,Verhandlungen des Vereins zur Beförderung des Gewerbfleifses, Berlin.

  21. Hestnes, M.R. (1969), “Multiplier and gradient methods”,Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications,4, 303–320.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Hughes, T.J.R., Taylor, R.L., Sackman, J.L., Curnier, A. and Kanoknukulchai, W. (1976), “A finite element method for a class of contact-impact problems”,Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering,8, 249–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Johnson, A.R. and Quigley C.J. (1989), “Frictionless geometrically non-linear contact with quadratic programming”,International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering,28, 127–144.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Ju, J.-W. and Taylor, R.L. (1988), “A perturbed lagrangian formulation for the finite element solution of nonlinear frictional contact problems”,Journal de Mecanique Theorique et Appliquée, supplement no. 1 to volume7, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ju, S.H. and Rowlands, R.E. (1999), “A three-dimensional frictional contact element whose stiffness matrix is symmetric”,Journal of Applied Mechanics,66, 460–467.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kikuchi, N. and Oden, J.T. (1988), “Contact problems in elasticity: A study of variational inequalities and finite element methods”, SIA M, Philadelphia.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Klarbring, A. (1992), “Mathematical programming and augmented lagrangian methods for frictional contct problems”, InProceedings: Contact Mechanics, International Symposium, Curnier, A. (Ed.), Lausanne, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Laursen, T.A. and Simo, J.C. (1993), “A continuum-based finite element formulation for the implicit solution of multi-body, large deformation frictional contact problems”,International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering,36, 3451–3485.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Lin, Y.K. (1967), “Probabilistic theory of structural dynamics”, McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Mijar, A.R. and Arora, J.S. (1999), “Elastostatic frictional contact problem formulation using optimization techniques”, InOptimization in industry, Belegundu, A.D. and Mistree, F. (Eds.), ASME, New York in print.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Mijar, A.R. and Arora, J.S. (2000), “Review of formulations for elastostatic frictional contact problems”,Structural Optimization, to appear.

  32. Mottershead, J.E., Pascoe, S.K. and English, R.G. (1992), “A general finite element approach for contact stress analysis”,International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering,33, 765–779.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Oden, J.T. and Pires, E.B. (1983), “Numerical analysis of certain contact problems in elasticity with non-classical friction laws”,Computers and Structures,16, 481–485.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Panagiotopoulos, P.D. (1985), “Inequality problems in mechanics and applications”, Boston Inc.

  35. Powell, M.J.D. (1969), “A method for nonlinear constraints in minimization problems”, InOptimization, R. Fletcher (Ed.), Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Refaat, M.H. and Meguid, S.A. (1998), “A new strategy for the solution of frictional contact problems”,International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering,43, 1053–1068.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Rockafellar, R.T. (1973), “A dual approach to solving nonlinear programming problems by unconstrained optimization”Mathematical Programming,5, 354–373.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  38. Signorini, A. (1933), “Sopra alcune questioni di elastostatica”,Atti della Società Italiana per il Progresso delle Scienze.

  39. Signorini, A. (1959), “Questioni de elasticita nonlinearizzata e semi linearizzata”,Rend. de matematica, Rome.

  40. Simo, J.C. and Laursen, T.A. (1992), “An augmented lagrangian treatment of contact problems involving friction”,Computers and Structures,42, 97–116.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  41. Simo, J.C., Wriggers, P. and Taylor, R.L. (1985), “A perturbed largrangian formulation for the finite element solution of contact problems”,Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering,50, 163–180.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  42. Stavroulakis, G.E., Panagiotopoulos, P.D. and Al-Fahed, A.M. (1991), “On the rigid body displacements and rotations in unilateral contact problems and applications”,Computers and Structures,40, 599–614.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. Wriggers, P. and Zavarise, G. (1993), “On the application of augmented Largrangian techniques for nonlinear constitutive laws in contact interfaces”,Communications in Numerical Methods in Engineering,9, 815–824.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  44. Zavarise, G., Wriggers, P. and Schrefler, B.A. (1995), “On augmented Lagrangian algorithms for thermomechnical contact problems with friction”,International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering,38, 2929–2949.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  45. Zhong, Zhi-Hua (1993), “Finite element procedures for contact-impact problems”, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mijar, A.R., Arora, J.S. Study of variational inequality and equality formulations for elastostatic frictional contact problems. ARCO 7, 387–449 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02736213

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02736213

Keywords

Navigation