Skip to main content
Log in

Nutritional support for children with cancer

  • Symposium on Advances in Oncology-I
  • Published:
The Indian Journal of Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Children with cancer are at risk of suffering from under nutrition, which can affect tolerance of therapy and may influence their overall survival. The goals of nutritional support in the cancer patient are to achieve and maintain desirable weight and to prevent or correct nutritional deficiencies. So early identification of patients at high risk for malnutrition is essential. There are different options for nutritional support. Oral feeding, when possible, is the first line. Enterai nutrition should be considered for those patients who cannot consume adequate macronutrients by mouth. Options are nasogastric tube or gastrostomy tube feeding. The advantages of enterai nutrition, when compared with parenteral nutrition, include better maintenance of the structural and functional integrity of the gastrointestinal tract, a decreased risk of bacterial translocation, greater ease and safety of administration, more physiologic and efficient use of nutrient substrates, decreased hepato-biliary complications, improved outcome and cost-effectiveness. Thus, parenteral nutrition should be considered if the gut is not functioning adequately to allow the normal absorption and digestion of nutrients or if enterai nutritional support is not sufficient to meet nutritional needs. Nutritional assessment and support should be integrated into treatment protocols for all children with neoplastic diseases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barr RD, Ribeiro RC, Agarwal BRet al. Pediatric oncology in countries with limited resources. In: Pizzo PA and Poplack DG, eds.Principles and Practice of Pediatric Oncology, 4th edn. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins 2002; 1541–1552.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Van Eys J. Nutrition of children with cancer.Front Radiat Ther Oncol 1982; 16: 177–183.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Andrassy RJ, Chwals WJ. Nutritional support of the pediatric oncology patient.Nutrition 1998; 14:124–129.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Smith D, Stevens MCG, Booth IW. Malnutrition at diagnosis of malignancies in childhood: common but mostly missed.Eur J Paediatr 1990; 150:318–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brennan B, Ross JA, Barr RD. On nutritional status and cancer in children.Cancer Strategy 1999; 1:195–202.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lee JH, Machtay M, Unger LDet al. Prophylactic gastrostomy tubes in patients undergoing intensive irradiation of cancer of the head and neck.Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1998; 124:871–875.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. American College of Physicians. Parenteral nutrition in patients receiving cancer chemotherapy.Ann Int Med 1989; 110: 734–736.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Copeland E. Intravenous hyperalimentation and cancer: a historical perspective.JPEN 1986; 10:337–342.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rickard KA, Grosfeld Jl, Kirksey Aet al. Reversal of protein-energy malnutrition in children during treatment of advanced neoplastic disease.Ann Surg 1979; 190: 771–781.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bowman LC, Williams R, Sanders Met al. Algorithm for nutritional support: experience of the metabolic and infusion support service of St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital.Int J Cancer Supp 1998; 11: 76–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Klimberg VS, McClellan JL. Glutamine, cancer, and its therapy.Am J Surg 1996; 172:418.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Donaldson SS, Wesley MN, DeWys WDet al A study of the nutritional status of pediatric cancer patients.Am J Dis Child 1981; 135:1107–1112.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Rickard KA, Detamore CM, Coates TDet al. Effect of nutrition staging on treatment delays and outcome in stage IV neuroblastoma.Cancer 1983; 52:587–598.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Obama M, Cangir A, van Eys J. Nutritional status and anthracycline cardiotoxicity in children.South Med J 1983; 76: 577–578.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Van Eys J, Copeland EM, Cangir Aet al. A clinical trial of hyperalimentation in children with metastatic malignancies.Med Pediatr Oncol 1980; 8: 68–73.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hays DM, Merritt RJ, Ashley Jet al. Effect of total parenteral nutrition on marrow recovery during induction therapy for acute non-lymphocytic leukemia in childhood.Med Pediatr Oncol 1983; 11:134–140.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ghavimi R, Shils ME, Scott BFet al Comparison of morbidity in children requiring abdominal radiation and chemotherapy with and without total parenteral nutrition.J Pediatr 1982; 101:530–537.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Rickard KA, Godshall BJ, Loghmani ESet al. Integration of nutrition support into oncologic treatment protocols for high and low nutritional risk children with Wilms tumor. A prospective randomized study.Cancer 1983; 64:491–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Shamberger RC, Pizzo PA, Goodgame JTet al. The effect of total parenteral nutrition on chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression.Am J Med 1983; 74:40–48.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hughes WT, Price RA, Sisko Fet al. Protein-calorie malnutrition: A host determinant for Pneumocystis carnii infection.Am J Dis Child 1974; 128:44–52.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ronald D. Barr.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sala, A., Wade, L. & Barr, R.D. Nutritional support for children with cancer. Indian J Pediatr 70, 813–816 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723805

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723805

Key words

Navigation