Skip to main content
Log in

The role of comparative advantage in trade within industries: A panel data approach for the European Union

  • Articles
  • Published:
Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Role of Comparative Advantage in Trade within Industries: A Panel Data Approach for the European Union. — A large share of EU member states trade is intra-industry trade (IIT) in the period 1985-1996; in particular, IIT is based on products differentiated in quality (vertical IIT). Moreover, exports from southern countries are located mainly at the lower end of the price-quality spectrum, whereas those countries with higher per capita incomes are located at the higher end. According to the vertical IIT models, we hypothesize that commercial specialization of members states over the quality spectrum within industries is explained by differences in technological, physical and human capital. The results show that comparative advantage is an important driver of the pattern of European trade within industries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abd-el-Rahman, K. (1991). Firms’ Competitive and National Comparative Advantages as Joint Determinants of Trade Composition.Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 127 (1): 83–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balassa, B. (1966). Tariff Reductions and Trade in Manufactures among the Industrial Countries.American Economic Review 56 (3): 466–473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balassa, B. (1986). Intra-Industry Specialization: A Cross-Country Analysis.European Economic Review 30 (1): 7–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balassa, B., and L. Bauwens (1987). Intra-Industry Specialization in a Multi-country and Multi-industry Framework.The Economic Journal 97 (December): 923–939.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R., and J. W. Lee (1993). International Comparisons of Educational Attainment.Journal of Monetary Economics 32 (3): 363–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benhabib, J., and M. Spiegel (1994). The Role of Human Capital in Economic Development: Evidence from Aggregate Cross-Country Data.Journal of Monetary Economics 34 (2): 143–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanes, V., and C. Martin (2000). The Nature and Causes of Intra-industry Trade: Back to the Comparative Advantage Explanation? The Case of Spain.Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 136 (3): 423–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brülhart, M., and R. Hine (1999).Intra-Industry Trade and Adjustment. The European Experience. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cañada, A., and A. Carmena (1991). La Integración en la CEE y los Cambios en el Sistema Fiscal-arancelario: Algunas Repercusiones sobre la Competitividad de la Economía Española (1986-1989). Working Paper 9101. Fundación Empresa PÚblica, Madrid.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coe, D. T., and E. Helpman (1995). International R&D Spillovers.European Economic Review 39 (5): 859–887.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, D. R. (1995). Intra-Industry Trade: A Heckscher-Ohlin-Ricardo Approach.Journal of International Economics 39 (3): 201–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Díaz Mora, C. (2001).El Impacto Comercial de la Integración Económica Europea en el Periodo 1985-1996. Madrid: Comité Económico y Social.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dollar, D. (1993). Technological Differences as a Source of Comparative Advantage.American Economic Review 83 (2): 431–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falvey, R. E. (1981). Commercial Policy and Intra-Industry Trade.Journal of International Economics 11 (4): 495–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falvey, R., and H. Kierzkowski (1987). Product Quality, Intra-Industry Trade and (Im)Perfect Competition. In H. Kierzkowski (ed.),Protection and Competition in International Trade. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flam, H., and E. Helpman (1987). Vertical Product Differentiation and North-South Trade.American Economic Review 77 (5): 810–822.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fontagné, L., M. Freudenberg, and N. Péridy (1997). Trade Patterns Inside the Single Market. Working Paper 97-07. CEPII.

  • Gandoy, R., and C. Díaz Mora (2000): Efectos Integración Económica: Efectos Comerciales. In R. Myro (ed.),Economía Europea: Crecimiento, Integración y Transformaciones Sectoriales. Madrid: Civitas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Globerman, S., and J. W. Dean (1990). Recent Trends in Intra-Industry Trade and Their Implications for Future Trade Liberalization.Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 126 (1): 25–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenaway, D. (1984). The Measurement of Product Differentiation in Empirical Studies of Trade Flows. In H. Kierzkowski (ed.),Monopolistic Competition and International Trade. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenaway, D., and R. C. Hine (1991). Intra-Industry Specialization, Trade Expansion and Adjustment in the European Economic Space.Journal of Common Market Studies 29 (6): 603–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenaway, D., and Ch. Milner (1986).The Economics of Intra-Industry Trade. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenaway, D., and J. Torstensson (1998). Economic Geography, Comparative Advantage and Trade within Industries: Evidence from the OECD. CEPR Discussion Paper 1857. London.

  • Greenaway, D., R. C. Hine, and C. Milner (1994). Country-specific Factors and the Pattern of Horizontal and Vertical Intra-Industry Trade in the U. K.Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 130 (1): 77–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grubel, H. G., and P. J. Lloyd (1975).Intra-Industry Trade, The Theory and Measurement of International Trade in Differentiated Products. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrigan, J. (1997). Technology, Factor Supplies and International Specialization: Estimating the Neoclassical Model.American Economic Review 87 (4): 477–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausman, J. (1978). Specification Tests in Econometrics.Econometrica 46 (6): 1251–1271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helpman, E. (1981). International Trade in the Presence of Product Differentiation, Economies of Scale and Monopolistic Competition.Journal of International Economics 11 (3): 306–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helpman, E., and P. Krugman (1985).Market Structure and Foreign Trade. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P. (1979). Increasing Returns, Monopolistic Competition and International Trade.Journal of International Economics 9 (4): 469–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P. (1991).Geography and Trade. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster, K. (1980). Intra-Industry Trade under Perfect Monopolistic Competition.Journal of International Economics 10(2): 151–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Learner, E. (1984).Sources of Comparative Advantage. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Motta, M. (1990). Recent Models of International Trade and Distributional Gains from Integration.Rivista Internationale di Scienze Economiche e Commerciali 37 (8): 713–736.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myro, R. (2000):Economia Europea: Crecimiento, Integración y Transformaciones Sectoriales. Madrid: Civitas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myro, R., and R. Gandoy (1999). El Sector Industrial. In J. L. García Delgado (ed.),Lecciones de Economía Española. Madrid: Civitas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myro, R., and C. Díaz Mora (2001). The Integration of Spain in the European Union: Main Industrial Effects. Institute Universitario Ortega y Gasset, Working Paper 0101 (European Economy Studies). Madrid.

  • Shacked, A., and J. Sutton (1984). Natural Oligopolies and International Trade. In H. Kierzkowski (ed.),Monopolistic Competition and International Trade. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Summers, R., and A. Heston (1991). The Penn World Tables (Mark 5): An Expanded Set of International Comparisons, 1950-88.Quarterly Journal of Economics 106 (2): 327–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torstensson, J. (1996). Can Factor Proportions Explain Vertical Intra-industry Trade.Applied Economic Letters 3: 307–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torstensson, J. (1999). Intra-industry Trade: What Does the Theory Predict and How Robust Are the Empirical Estimates? In M. Brülhart and R. C. Hine (eds.),Intraindustry Trade and Adjustment. The European Experience. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, H. (1980). A Heteroscedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroscedasticity.Econometrica 48 (4): 817–838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Mora, C.D. The role of comparative advantage in trade within industries: A panel data approach for the European Union. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 138, 291–316 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02707746

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02707746

Navigation