Skip to main content
Log in

Vertical distribution and feeding types of nematodes from Chetumal Bay, Quintana Roo, Mexico

  • Published:
Estuaries Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The vertical distribution and feeding type of nematodes in sediments of Chetumal Bay, Mexico, were studied in five intertidal transects along the urbanized zone in June and December 1995. Sediments were collected with a PVC corer to 6-cm sediment depth and cut immediately into three equal 2-cm depth fractions. Nematode density varied from 7.4 × 103 to 5.3 × 105 m−2 in June and from 1.7 × 104 to 7.2 × 105 m−2 in December. In June, the epistrate feederPseudochromadora sp. was the most abundant in the deepest sediment fraction (4–6 cm), whereas epistrate feeders,Neotonchoides sp.,Desmodora sp., and the deposit feederBathylaimus australis were dominant in the top most sediment (0–2 cm). In December, deposit feeders,Desmolaimus zeelandicus, Parodontophora sp., and the epistrate feederOncholaimus oxyuris were the most abundant in the deepest sediment, whereasNeotonchoides sp. andPseudochromadora sp. dominated the first 2 cm of sediments. Highest nematode density was recorded in the uppermost sediment layer (0–2 cm). Feeding types showed different abundance among transects and between months. There was a seasonal change in vertical distribution of nematodes, with the highest abundance in the deepest sediment layer in December, possibly due to the effect of wind waves on sediments of Chetumal Bay. The trophic composition of the nematode fauna in Chetumal Bay showed a dominance of deposit feeders and epistrate feeders, most likely in response to organic enrichment that is typical of eutrophic environments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  • Boucher, G. andN. Gourbault. 1990. Sub-littoral meiofauna and diversity of nematode assemblage off Guadeloupe Islands.Bulletin of Marine Science 47:448–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. B. 1984. Sediment analysis, p. 41–65.In A. Holme and A. D. McIntyre (eds.), Methods for the Study of Marine Benthos. Blackwell, London, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrera-Parra, L., N. E. González, andS. I. Salazar-Vallejo. 1997. Bentos litoral de bahía Chetumal, Quintana Roo, p. 46–64.In M. C. Ortiz-Hernández (ed.). Estudio Emergente Sobre la Mortandad de Bagres en la Bahía de Chetumal. Informe Técnico. El Colegio de la Frontera Sur, Chetumal, México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, Jr.,W. E. 1974. Determination of carbonate and organic matter in calcareous sediments and sedimentary rocks by loss on ignition: Comparisons with other methods.Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 14:242–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Jesús-Navarrete, A. andJ. Herrera-Gómez. 1999. Nematofauna asociada a la zona urbana de la Bahía de Chetumal, Quintana Roo, México.Revista de Biología Tropical 47:867–875.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eskin, R. A. andB. C. Coull. 1987. Seasonal and three-year variability of meiobenthic nematode populations at two estuarine sites.Marine Ecology Progress Series 41:295–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferris, V. R. andJ. M. Ferris. 1979. Thread Worms (Nematoda), p. 2–33.In C. W. Harthy and S. L. Fuller (eds.), Pollution Ecology of Estuarine Invertebrates. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenchel, T. andB. O. Jansson. 1966. On the vertical distribution of microfauna in the sediments of a brackish water beach.Ophelia 3:161–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenchel, T. andR. J. Riedl. 1970. The sulfide system: A new biotic community underneath the oxidized layer of marine sand bottoms.Marine Biology 7:255–268.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gasca, R. andI. Castellanos. 1993. Zooplancton de la Bahía de Chetumal, Mar Caribe, México.Revista de Biología Tropical 41:619–625.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heip, C., M. Vincx, N. Smol, andG. Vranken. 1982. The systematic and ecology of free-living marine nematodes.Helminthological Abstracts Series B, Plant Nematology 51:1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogue, E. W. 1982. Sediment disturbance and spatial distributions of shallow water meiobenthic nematodes on the open Oregon coast.Journal of Marine Research 40:551–573.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulings, N. C. andJ. S. Gray. 1976. Physical factors controlling abundance of meiofauna on tidal and a tidal beaches.Marine Biology 34:77–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, P. 1983. Meiofaunal abundance and vertical zonation in a sublittoral soft bottom, with a test of the Haps corer.Marine Biology 74:319–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, P. 1984. Ecology of benthic and epiphytic nematodes in brackish waters.Hydrobiologia 108:201–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, P. 1987. Feeding ecology of free-living aquatic nematodes.Marine Ecology Progress Series 35:187–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joint, I. R., J. M. McGee, andR. M. Warwick. 1982. Determination of fine scale vertical distribution of microbes and meiofauna in a intertidal sediment.Marine Biology 72:157–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambshead, P. J. D. 1986. Sub-catastrophic sewage and industrial waste contamination as reveled by marine nematode faunal analysis.Marine Ecology Progress Series 29:247–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lana, P. C. 1982. Um novo indice para avaliar a heterogeneidade de sedimentos nao consolidados.Arquivos de Biologia e Tecnologia 25:357–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manugistics, Inc. 1993. Statgraphics 7.0, Reference Manual. Font Software, Bitstream, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLachlan, A. 1978. A quantitative analysis of meiofauna and the chemistry of the redox potential discontinuity zone in a sheltered sandy beach.Estuarine and Coastal Marine Science 7: 275–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moens, T. andM. Vincx. 1997. Observations on the feeding ecology of estuarine nematodes.Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 77:211–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olafsson, E. andR. Elmgren. 1997. Seasonal dynamics of sublittoral meiobenthos in relation to phytoplankton sedimentation in the Baltic Sea.Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 45: 149–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortíz, M. C. andJ. R. Sáenz. 1997. Detergents and orthophosphates inputs from urban discharges to Chetumal Bay, Quintana Roo, Mexico.Bulletin of Environmental Contamination Toxicology 59:486–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortíz-Hernández, M. C. andR. Sáenz-Morales. 1999. Effects of organic material and distribution of fecal coliforms in Chetumal Bay, Quintana Roo, Mexico.Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 55:423–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Platt, H. M. andR. M. Warwick. 1980. The significance of free-living nematodes to the littoral ecosystem, p. 729–759.In J. H. Price, D. E. G. Irvine, and W. F. Farnham (eds.), The Shore Environment. 2: Ecosystems. Academic Press, London, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Platt, H. M. andR. M. Warwick. 1983. A Synopsis of Free-living Marine Nematodes, Part I. British Enoplids. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schratzberger, M. andR. M. Warwick. 1999. Differential effects of various types of disturbances on the structure of nematodes assemblages: An experimental approach.Marine Ecology Progress Series 181:227–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tietjen, J. H. 1969. The ecology of shallow water meiofauna in two New England estuaries.Oecolgia 2:251–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alberto de Jesús-Navarrete.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

de Jesús-Navarrete, A., Herrera-Gómez, J. Vertical distribution and feeding types of nematodes from Chetumal Bay, Quintana Roo, Mexico. Estuaries 25, 1131–1137 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02692210

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02692210

Keywords

Navigation