Skip to main content
Log in

On imitative behavior

  • Published:
The Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previous studies of effects of imitation on individuals in a population, in which the tendencies ϕ towards one or another of two mutually exclusive behaviors are distributed, are amplified by considering the distribution, not of ϕ directly, but of the excitations ɛ01 and ɛ02 of the two centers which mediate each of the two behaviors. It is shown how the distribution of ϕ is derived from those of ɛ01 and ɛ02. It is found that when both tendencies ɛ01 and ɛ02 are weak, the choice of one of the two behaviors not only is originally determined by pure chance, but that it is impossible to effect a change of the behaviour of a large population from one adopted behavior to a possible opposite one, by inhibiting the tendency towards the first behavior. Such a change by inhibition is possible only when the tendencies toward both mutually exclusive behaviors are sufficiently strong. A possible application to the persistency of irrelevant established behavior patterns, such as handshakes, is suggested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature

  • Landahl, H. D. 1938. “A Contribution to the Mathematical Biophysics of Psychophysical Discrimination.”Psychometrika,3, 107–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rashevsky, N. 1947.Mathematical Theory of Human Relations. Bloomington, Indiana: Principia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1949a. “Mathematical Biology of Social Behavior.”Bull. Math. Biophysics,11, 105–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1949b. “Mathematical Biology of Social Behavior: II.”,11, 157–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1949c. “Mathematical Biology of Social Behavior: III,”,11, 255–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1950. “Mathematical Biology of Social Behavior: IV. Imitation Effects as a Function of Distance.”,12, 177–185.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • — 1951. “A note on Imitative Behavior and Information.”,13, 147–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1953. “Imitative Behavior in Nonuniformly Spatially Distributed Populations.”,15, 63–71.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • — 1956. “Studies in Mathematical Biosociology of Imitative Behavior: I. Effects of Income Distribution.”,18, 323–336.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • — 1957. “Contributions to the Theory of Imitative Behavior.”,19, 91–119.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Rashevsky, N. 1959.Mathematical Biology of Social Behavior. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1960a. “On Imitative Behavior.”Bull. Math. Biophysics,22, 63–71.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • — 1960b.Mathematical Biophysics. 3rd edition, Vol. II. New York: Dover Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1961a. “On Imitative Behavior. II. Time Course of Change from One Behavior to Another.”Bull. Math. Biophysics,23, 405–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1961b. “On the Unreliability of Judgments of Certain Social Situations by Minority Groups.”,23, 413–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1962. “Contributions to the Theory of Imitative Behavior: The Number of Political Parties as Determined by Biological and Social Factors.”,24, 1–3.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rashevsky, N. On imitative behavior. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics 27, 175 (1965). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02498773

Download citation

  • Received:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02498773

Keywords

Navigation