Skip to main content
Log in

Significance of acoustic field for the myocardial opacification by intravenous contrast echocardiography

  • Original Contribution
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Ultrasonics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose: Myocardial opacification is not always homogeneous even in a normal heart. The aim of this study is to clarify why myocardial opacification is faint at the lateral side of the field or at the part far from the focus point.Methods: In canine study, videointensity of the opacification at septal and lateral walls of the short axis view was examined by using both electric and mechanical transducers. In in vitro study, acoustic pressure at several points away from the beam direction was measured using a hydrophone in a water tank. In particular, the effect of position of focus point was evaluated with an electronic transducer.Results: In canine experiment, myocardial opacification of the lateral wall was faint with the electronic transducer, however the mechanical one obtained homogeneous opacification. In vitro, using the electronic type the acoustic pressure was low as the beam shifted, laterally, whereas it was almost uniform in the mechanical type. With the electronic type, moreover, the beam width at the near field was not sharp when the focus point was far, resulting in execessive acoustic pressure.Conclusion: To obtain homogeneous opacifiction, a homogeneous acoustic field is indispensable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Porter TR, Xie F: Increased ultrasound contrast and decreased microbubble destruction rates with triggered ultrasound imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1996;9: 599–605.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Crouse LJ, Kramer PH: Second Harmonic imaging: Good reverberations. Am Heart J 1999;138: 19–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Beppu S: Use of Intermittent Imaging. J Clin Echocardiogr 2000;1: 270–276.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ishikura F: Setup of equipment and agents at intravenous myocardial contrast echocardiography. In: Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography. Tokyo, Bunkodo, 2000; pp. 50–61.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Daimon M, Beppu S, Ishikura F, et al: Optimal Setting of Focus Points for Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography with Intravenous Optison. J Cardiol 2001;37: 201–207.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Matsushita K, Beppu S, Ishikura F, et al: Flash Effect of Contrast Microbubbles by Ultrasound Exposure. J Med Ultrasonics 2000;27: 967–972.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Iwamoto M: Pitfalls of Digital Imaging. Innervision 2002;17: 3742.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Yagura, S., Beppu, S., Ishikura, F. et al. Significance of acoustic field for the myocardial opacification by intravenous contrast echocardiography. J Med Ultrasonics 30, 217–223 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02481284

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02481284

Keywords

Navigation