Skip to main content
Log in

Automatic virtual transducer locating system to assist in interpreting ultrasound imaging

  • Original Contribution
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Ultrasonics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bodymarkers are used to label the location and orientation of the transducer during ultrasound examination. We attempt to evaluate the usefulness of a new system that indicates transducer location over that of the conventional bodymarker. The proposed system uses an electromagnetic tracking device to track the three-dimensional (3-D) position and orientation of a small electromagnetic receiver attached to the ultrasound transducer relative to a transmitter placed under the bed. The new bodymarker is displayed as a 3-D graphic model. The physique of the examinee is calibrated by representing five locations on the body on the original bodymarker. To evaluate the accuracy of the system visually, we compared the transducer position indicated in the new bodymarker and the actual transducer position in four abdominal sections. Actual and displayed position and orientation closely agreed in all cases, and the transducer position indicator in the bodymarker display moved smoothly. Automatic transducer locator on the virtual 3-D bodymarker accurately indicated its position and orientation. This system is useful and convenient in clinical examinations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hughes SW, D'Arcy TJ, Maxwell DJ, et al: Volume estimation from multiplanar 2D ultrasound images using a remote electromagnetic position and orientation sensor. Ultrasound in Med & Biol 1996;22: 957–968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rohling RN, Gee AH, Berman L: Automatic registration of 3-D ultrasound images. Ultrasound in Med & Biol 1998;24: 841–854.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Detmer PR, Bashein G, Hodges T, et al: 3D ultrasonic image feature localization based on magnetic scanning: in vitro calibration and validation. Ultrasound in Med & Biol 1994;9: 923–936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Moon WK, Noh DY, Im JG: Multifocal, multicentric, and contralateral breast cancers: bilateral whole-breast US in the preoperative evaluation of patients. Radiology 2002;224: 569–576.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kaplan SS: Clinical utility of bilateral whole breast US in the evaluation of women with dense breast tissue. Radiology 2001;221: 641–649.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Muratore DM, Galloway RL: Beam calibration without a phantom for creating a 3-D freehand ultrasound. Ultrasound in Med & Biol 2001;27: 1557–1566.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Barratt DC, Davies AH, Hughes AD, et al: Optimization and evaluation of an electromagnetic tracking device for high-accuracy three-dimensional ultrasound imaging of the carotid arteries. Ultrasound in Med & Biol 2001;27: 957–968.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Tuomola PM, Gee AH, Prager RW, et al: Body-centered visualization for freehand 3-D. Ultrasound in Med & Biol 2000;26: 539–550.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Taniguchi, N., Kuwata, T., Ono, T. et al. Automatic virtual transducer locating system to assist in interpreting ultrasound imaging. J Med Ultrasonics 30, 211–216 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02481283

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02481283

Keywords

Navigation