Skip to main content
Log in

Covariance, invariance, and equivalence: A viewpoint

  • Review Articles
  • Published:
General Relativity and Gravitation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Conclusion and Summary

We have given what, we hope, are precise statements of the main principles that underly general relativity. It is not our intention to argue that these statements correspond to the original statements of these principles. We have used the original terms, principle of equivalence, etc., to designate the formulations given here primarily for convenience and because we feel that our formulations are, at least, in the spirit of the general accepted meaning of these appellations. Our formulation of these principles rests primarily on the observation that there are two types of objects that appear in the descriptions of physical systems, which we have termed absolute and dynamical. A covariance group consists of those transformations which transform one observable set of values of these objects into another observable set and correspond to the passive transformations that one can carry out on the system. An invariance group is the subgroup of a covariance group that leaves invariant the absolute objects. If there are no absolute objects, the two groups coincide.

The principle of general covariance asserts that the Einstein group, that is, ‘the group of arbitrary local coordinate transformations’, is a covariance group of all physical systems that can be described by space-time theories. The requirement that the Einstein group is also an invariance group of all physical systems constitutes the principle of general invariance. Support for this latter principle comes first from a Machian type of argument that there should be no absolute objects in nature. A weak form of the principle of equivalence that asserts the equivalence of inertial effects to gravitational effects (but not necessarily conversely) allows one to conclude the impossibility of distinguishing between arbitrary active and passive coordinate transformations. Since the latter transformations constitute the Einstein group, we conclude that the former also constitute this group. Since the active transformations constitute an invariance group, we are again led to the conclusion that the Einstein group is the invariance group, of all spacetime systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

ReferencesReferences

  1. Einstein, A. (1918).Ann. Physik (Leipzig),55, 241.

    MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. See, for example, the discussion in Anderson, J. L. and Gautreau, R. (1969)Phys. Rev.,185, No. 5, 1656.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kretschmann, E. (1917)Ann. Physik (Leipzig),53, 575.

    MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Fock, V. (1964).The Theory of Space, Time, and Gravitation, Pergamon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Einstein, A. (1955)The Meaning of Relativity. Princeton University Press, Princeton, p. 100.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. See. for example,Gravitation, and Relativity, Chiu and Hoffmann (1964). Eds. W. A. Benjamin, Inc., New York, Chaps. 7 and 15.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Anderson, J. L. (1967).Principles of Relativity Physics, Academic Press, New York, Chap. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Eckart, C. (1940).Phys. Rev.,58, 919.

    Article  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Landau, L. D. and Lifshitz, E. M. (1962).Fluid Mechanics, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass. Chap. XV.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nöther, E. (1918),Nachr. Ges. Wiss. Göttingen, 211.

  11. It is just this fact that makes it impossible in general to define a unique stress-energy for the gravitational field.

  12. For a covariant formulation of Newtonian mechanics, see Trautman, A. (1963),Compte-rendu hebdomadaire des Séances de l'Académie des sciences,257, 617; Friedrichs, K. (1927).Math. Ann. 98, 566.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Eötvös, R. (1891).Math. natur. Berichte Ungarn. 8, 65.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dicke, R. H. (1961).Sci. Am. 205, No. 6, 84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dicke, R. H. ref. 6, Chap. 1.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Anderson, J.L. Covariance, invariance, and equivalence: A viewpoint. Gen Relat Gravit 2, 161–172 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02450447

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02450447

Keywords

Navigation