Skip to main content
Log in

Tradeable emission permits regulations in the presence of imperfectly competitive product markets: Welfare implications

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Environmental and Resource Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the present paper, we analyse the interaction of a competitive market for emission permits with an oligopolistic product market. It is well known that a competitive permits market achieves the cost minimizing distribution of abatement effort among the polluting firms for a given reduction in emissions. However, when the product market is oligopolistic, it may redistribute production inefficiently among firms. It has been suggested that this inefficiency can outweigh the gains obtained from using emission permits instead of command and control. Although this argument is clearly correct under full information, it is shown in the present paper that it reverses under incomplete information. In particular, it is shown that when tradeable emission permits are specified according to the standard textbook example, they yield higher social welfare than the command and control regulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baumol, W. J. and W. E. Oates (1988),The Theory of Environmental Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besanko, D. (1987, ‘Performance Versus Design Standards in the Regulation of Pollution’,Journal of Public Economics 34, 19–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borenstein, S. (1988), ‘On the Efficiency of Competitive Markets for Operating Licenses’,Quarterly Journal of Economics 103, 357–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M. (1969), ‘External Diseconomies, Corrective Taxes, and Market Structure’,American Economic Review 59, 174–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, P. (1982),The control of Resources. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hung, M. N. and E. S. Sartzetakis (1994), ‘On Welfare Consequences of Permits Trading Under Imperfect Competition’,Working paper, GREEN, Départment d'économique, Université Laval, Québec.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malueg, D. A. (1990), ‘Welfare Consequences of Emission Credit Trading Programs’,Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 19, 66–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Misiolek, W. S. and H. W. Elder (1987), ‘Exclusionary Manipulation of Markets for Pollution Rights’,Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 16 156–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sartzetakis, E. S. (1993), ‘Cost-Efficiency and Welfare Comparison of Tradeable Emission Permits to Command and Control’,Working paper, Cahier 93-21, GREEN, Département d'économique, Université Laval, Québec.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torrens, I. M., J. E. Cichanowicz, and J. B. Platt (1992), ‘The 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments: Overview, Utility Industry Responses, and Strategic Implications’,Annu. Rev. Energy Environ. 17, 211–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von de Fehr, N.-H. M. (1993), ‘Tradeable Emission Rights and Strategic Interaction’,Environmental and Resource Economics 3, 129–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sartzetakis, E.S. Tradeable emission permits regulations in the presence of imperfectly competitive product markets: Welfare implications. Environ Resource Econ 9, 65–81 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02441370

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02441370

Key words

Navigation