Skip to main content
Log in

Constitutions as constraints: A case study of three american constitutions

  • Published:
Constitutional Political Economy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Original Constitution of the United States, the Articles of Confederation, was approved in 1781, but within a few years the Articles were replaced by the Constitution of the United States. Approximately seven decades late, the Confederate States of America wrote a constitution using the U.S. Constitution as a model. The three documents are used as a case study on constitutional rules as constraints on government. When compared to the Articles, the effect of adopting the Constitution was to relax constraints on the federal government. The Confederate Constitution added constraints to the U.S. Constitution, while retaining the same basic framework.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, T.L. and P.J. Hill (1980)The Birth of a Transfer Society. Stanford: Hoover Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beard, C.A. (1913)An Economic Interpretation of the Constitution of the United States. New York: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, J.M. (1924)The Constitution of the United States. New York: George H. Doran Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, G. and J.M. Buchanan (1980)The Power to Tax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, G. and J.M. Buchanan (1985)the Reason of Rules. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J.M. (1975)The Limits of Liberty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J.M. (1990) “The Domain of Constitutional Economics.”Constitutional Political Economy 1 (1): 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J.M. and G. Tullock (1962)The Calculus of Consent. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J.M. and R.E. Wagner (1977)Democracy in Deficit: The Political Legacy of Lord Keynes. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eidelberg, P. (1968)The Philosophy of the American Constitution. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrand, M. (1937)The Records of the Federal Convention of 1787. Revised edition in Four Volumes. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, A., J. Jay and J. Madison [1937 (1788)]The Federalist. Washington, D.C.: National Home Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F.A. (1960)The Constitution of Liberty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgs, R. (1987)Crisis and Leviathan: Critical Episodes in the Growth of American Government. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holcombe, R.G. (1980) “A Contractarian Model of the Decline in Classical Liberalism.”Public Choice 35 (3): 260–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holcombe, R. (1985)An Economic Analysis of Democracy. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holcombe, R. (1992) “The Distributive Model of Government: Evidence from the Confederate Constitution.”Southern Economic Journal: (forthcoming).

  • Jensen, M. (1940)The Articles of Confederation. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, D. (1990) “The Microfoundations of Rules versus Discretion.”Constitutional Political Economy 1 (3): 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C.R. (1963)The Confederate Constitutions. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leoni, B. (1961)Freedom and the Law. Los Angeles: Nash Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manley, J.F., and K.M. Dolbeare (1987)The Case Against the Constitution. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • McConnell, G. (1966)Private Power and American Democracy. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, R.A. and R.L. Ohsfeldt (1989) “Self-Interest, Agency Theory, and Political Voting Behavior: The Ratification of the United States Constitution.”American Economic Review 79 (1): 219–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M., Jr. (1982)The Rise and Decline of Nations. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, V. (1987)The Political Theory of a Compound Republic. Second Edition. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prescott, A.T. (1941)Drafting the Federal Constitution. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pole, J.R. (ed) (1987)The American Constitution: For and Against. New York: Hill and Wang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quynn, R.H. (1959)The Constitutions of Abraham Lincoln & Jefferson Davis. New York: Exposition Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1971)A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riker, W.H. (1964)Federalism: Origin, Operation, Significance. Boston: Little Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riker, W.H. (1987)The Development of American Federalism. Boston: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutland, R.A. (1981) “George Mason: The Revolutionist as Conservative.” In: R. A. Rossum and G.L. McDowell (eds)The American Founding. Port Washington, N.Y.: Kennikat Press: chap. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiebout, C.M. (1956) “A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures.”Journal of Political Economy 64: 416–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R.E. (1989)To Promote the General Welfare: Market Processes vs. Political Transfers. San Francisco: Pacific Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, Charles, (1937)The Making of the Constitution. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weingast, B.R., K.A. Shepsle and C. Johnsen (1981) “The Political Economy of Benefits and Costs: A Neoclassical Approach to Distributive Politics.”Journal of Political Economy 89 (4): 642–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The author gratefully acknowledges helpful comments from Bruce Benson, Donald Boudreaux, James Dorn, Thomas Dye, Robert Ekelund, Milton Marquis, Richard McKenzie, Glenn Parker, Gordon Tullock, Viktor Vanberg, and Richard Wagner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Holcombe, R.G. Constitutions as constraints: A case study of three american constitutions. Constit Polit Econ 2, 303–328 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02393134

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02393134

Keywords

Navigation