Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Measuring the relationship between dietary quality and body size in primates

  • Published:
Primates Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The feeding niche and the body size of any species are fundamental parameters that constrain the evolution of many other phenotypic characters. Moreover, previous work has shown that body size and diet are correlated, as a consequence of the negative allometry of metabolic rate. Unfortunately, the precise form of the association between body size and diet has never been specified, principally because no suitable cross-species measure of diet has been advanced. Here we develop a measure of diet that is sensitive over the whole spectrum of primate feeding niches, and use this measure to define the relationship between body size and diet for a sample of 72 primate species. Subsequently, we present several examples of how behavioral and ecological hypotheses can be tested by examining the extent to which particular species deviate from the general diet-body size pattern.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altmann, S. A., 1974. Baboons, space, time and energy.Amer. Zool., 14: 221–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, J. D. &J. Baldwin, 1972. The ecology and behavior of squirrel monkeys (Saimiri oerstedii) in a natural forest in western Panama.Folia Primatol., 18: 161–184.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bateman, A. J., 1948. Intra-sexual selection inDrosophila.Heredity, 2: 349–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, R. H., 1971. A grazing ecosystem in the Serengeti.Sci. Amer., 225(1): 86–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonner, J. T., 1965.Size and Cycle: An Essay on the Structure of Biology. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. L., 1964. The evolution of diversity in avian territorial systems.Wilson Bull., 76: 160–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Case, T. J., 1979. Optimal body size and an animal's diet.Acta Biotheoret., 28: 54–69.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock, T., 1974. Primate social organization and ecology.Nature, 250: 539–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———— &P. Harvey, 1977a. Species differences in feeding and ranging behavior in primates. In:Primate Ecology,T. H. Clutton-Brock (ed.), Academic Press, London, pp. 557–584.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———— & ————, 1977b. Primate ecology and social organization.J. Zool., Lond., 183: 1–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———— & ————, 1979. Comparison and adaptation.Proc. Royal Soc., B, 205: 547–565.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ————, ———— &B. Rudder, 1977. Sexual dimorphism, socionomic sex ratio and body weight in primates.Nature, 269: 797–800.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crook, J. H., 1964. The evolution of social organization and visual communication in the weaver birds (Ploceinae).Behav. Supple., 10: 1–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————, 1972. Sexual selection, dimorphism and social organization in the primates. In:Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, 1871–1971.B. G. Campbell (ed.), Aldine, Chicago, pp. 231–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidge, C., 1978. Ecology of baboonsPapio ursinus at cape point.Zool. Afr., 13: 329–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denham, W. W., 1971. Energy relations and some basic properties of primate social organization.Amer. Anthropol., 73: 77–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeVore, I., 1963. Comparative ecology and behavior of monkeys and apes. In:Classification and Human Evolution,S. L. Washburn (ed.), Werner-Gren Foundation, New York, pp. 301–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleagle, J. G. &R. A. Mittermeier, 1980. Body size and comparative ecology of seven surinam monkeys.Amer. J. Phys. Anthropol., 52: 301–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fogden, M. A., 1974. A preliminary study of the western tarsier. In:Prosimian Biology,G. Doyle &A. C. Walker (eds.), Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, pp. 151–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fooden, J., 1964. Stomach contents and gastro-intestinal proportions in wild-shot Guianan monkeys.Amer. J. Phys. Anthropol., 22: 227–231.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Galdikas, B. M. F. &G. Teleki, 1981. Variations in subsistence activities of male and female pongidsCurr.Anthropol., 22: 241–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaulin, S. J. C., 1979. A Jarman-Bell model of primate feeding niches.Human Ecol., 7: 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———— &C. K. Gaulin, 1982. Behavioral ecology ofAlouatta seniculus in Andean cloud forest.Int. J. Primatol., 3: 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———— &M. Konner, 1977. On the natural diet of primates, including humans. In:Nutrition and the Brain, Vol. 1,R. Wurtman &J. Wurtman (eds.), Raven Press, New York, pp. 1–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • ---- &J. A. Kurland, n.d. Ecological tactics in monogamy: mating system body weight and diet among primates.Amer. J. Primatol. (under review).

  • ———— &L. Sailer, 1984a. Are females the ecological sex?Amer. Anthropol., 86: 111–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———— & ————, 1984b. Sexual dimorphism among the primates: the relative impact of allometry and sexual selection.Int. J. Primatol., 5: 515–535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gautier-Hion, A., 1980. Seasonal variations of diet related to species and sex in a community ofCercopithecus monkeys.J. Anim. Ecol., 49: 237–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———— &J. P. Gautier, 1978. Le singe de brazza: Un strategie original.Zeitschrift Tierpsychol., 46: 84–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geist, V., 1974. On the relationship of social organization and ecology in ungulates.Amer. Zool., 14: 205–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gittens, S. P., 1982. Feeding and ranging in the agile gibbon.Folia Primatol., 38: 39–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haddow, A. H., 1952. Field and laboratory studies of the African monkey,Cercopithecus ascanius Schmidti Matschie.Proc. Zool. Soc., Lond., 122: 297–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Happel, R. E., 1982. Ecology ofPithecia hirsuta in Peru.J. Hum. Evol., 11: 581–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, P. H. &G. M. Mace, 1982. Comparisons between taxa and adaptive trends: Problems of methodology. In:Current Problems in Sociobiology,King's College Sociobiology Group (eds.), Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, pp. 343–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazama, N., 1964. Weighing wild Japanese monkeys in Arashiyama.Primates, 5: 81–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Islam, M. A. &K. A. Husein, 1982. A preliminary study of the ecology of the capped langur.Folia Primatol., 39: 145–159.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Iwamoto, T., 1982. Food and nutritional condition of free-ranging Japanese monkeys on Koshima islet during winter.Primates, 23: 153–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarman, P. J., 1974. The social organization of antelope in relation to their ecology.Behaviour, 58: 215–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————, 1982. Prospects for interspecific comparison in sociobiology. In:Current Problems in Sociobiology,King's College Sociobiology Group (eds.), Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, pp. 323–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolly, A., 1972.The Evolution of Primate Behavior. MacMillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kern, J. A., 1964. Observations on the habits of the proboscis monkey,Nasalis larvatus wurmb, made in the Brunei Bay area, Borneo.Zoologica, 49: 183–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinzey, W. G., 1981. The titi monkey, genusCallicebus. In:Ecology and Behavior of Neotropical Primates, Vol. 1,A. F. Coimbra-Filho &R. A. Mittermeier (eds.), Academia Brasilieira de Ciencias, Rio de Janeiro, pp. 241–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleiber, M., 1961.The Fire of Life. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koganezawa, M., 1975. Food habits of the Japanese monkey,Macaca fuscata, in the Boso mountains.Contemporary Primatology, Karger, Basel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurland, J. A. &S. J. C. Gaulin, 1984. The evolution of male parental investment: Effects of genetic relatedness and feeding ecology on the allocation of reproductive effort. In:Primate Paternalism,D. M. Taub (ed.), Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, pp. 259–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leutenegger, W. &J. Cheverud, 1982. Correlates of sexual dimorphism in primates: Ecological and size variables.Int. J. Primatol., 3: 387–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milton, K. &M. L. May, 1976. Body weight, diet and home range area in primates.Nature, 259: 459–462.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mittermeier, R. A. &M. G. M. van Roosmalen, 1981. Preliminary observations on habitat utilization and diet in eight Surinam monkeys.Folia Primatol., 36: 1–39.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mori, A., 1979. Analysis of population changes by measurement of body weight in the Koshima troop of Japanese monkeys.Primates, 20: 371–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mostellor, F. &J. W. Tukey, 1977.Data Analysis and Regression. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Napier, J. R. &P. H. Napier, 1967.Handbook of Living Primates. Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemitz, C., 1979. Outline of the behavior ofTarsius bancanus. In:The Study of Prosimian Behavior,G. A. Doyle &R. D. Martin (eds.), Academic Press, New York, pp. 631–661.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quris, R., 1976. Données comparatives sur la socio-ecologie de huit espèces de cercopithecidae vivant dans une même zone de forêt primitive périodiquement inondée (nord-est du Gabon).Terre et Vie, 30: 193–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodman, P. S., 1978. Diets, densities and distribution of bornean primates. In:The Ecology of Arboreal Folivores,G. G. Montgomery (ed.), Smithsonian Inst. Press, Washington, D.C., pp. 465–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roonwal, M. L. &S. M. Mohnot, 1977.Primates of South Asia: Ecology, Sociobiology and Behavior. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacher, G. &E. F. Staffeldt, 1975. Relation of gestation time to brain weight in placental mammals: implication for the theory of vertebrate growth.Amer. Naturalist, 108: 593–615.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulz, A. H., 1933. Observations on the growth, classification, and evolutionary specialization of gibbons and siamangs.Human Biol., 5: 212–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————, 1941. The relative size of the cranial capacity of the primates.Amer. J. Phys. Anthropol., 28: 173–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tattersall, I., 1976. Group structures and activity rhythm inLemur mongoz (Primates, Lemuriformes) on Anjouan and Moneli Islands, Comoro Archipelago.Anthropol. Pap. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., New York, 53(4): 367–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———— &R. W. Sussman, 1975. Observations on the ecology and behavior of the mongoose lemur,Lemur mongoz mongoz Linnaeus (Primates, Lemuriformes), at Ampijora, Madagascar.Anthropol. Pap. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., New York, 52(4): 193–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terborgh, J. 1983.Five New World Primates. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilson, R. L., 1979. Behavior of hoolock gibbonHylobates hoolock during different seasons in Assam, India.J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc., 76: 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———— &R. R. Tenaza, 1976. Monogamy and duetting in an old world monkey.Nature, 263: 320–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trivers, R. L., 1972. Parental investment and sexual selection. In:Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, 1871–1971,B. G. Campbell (ed.), Aldine, Chicago, pp. 136–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tukey, J. W., 1977.Exploratory Data Analysis. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waser, P., 1977. Feeding, ranging and group size in the Mangabey,Cercopithecus albigena. In:Primate Ecology,T. H. Clutton-Brock (ed.), Academic Press, London, pp. 183–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe, K., 1981. Variations in group composition and population density of the two sympatric mentawaian leaf-monkeys.Primates, 22: 145–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheatley, B. P., 1982. Energetics of foraging inMacaca fascicularis andPongo pygmaeus and a selective advantage of large body size in the orang-utan.Primates, 23: 348–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G. C., 1966.Adaptation and Natural Selection. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Anthropology, University of Pittsburgh, 15260, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.

    Lee Douglas Sailer & Steven J. C. Gaulin

  2. Department of Science and Technology Studies, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 12181, Troy, New York, U.S.A.

    James S. Boster

  3. Department of Anthropology, Pennsylvania State University, 16802, University Park, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.

    Jeffrey A. Kurland

Authors
  1. Lee Douglas Sailer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Steven J. C. Gaulin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. James S. Boster
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jeffrey A. Kurland
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

About this article

Cite this article

Sailer, L.D., Gaulin, S.J.C., Boster, J.S. et al. Measuring the relationship between dietary quality and body size in primates. Primates 26, 14–27 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02389044

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02389044

Key Words

Search

Navigation