Skip to main content
Log in

Mechanism of tolerance in rice varieties differing in sodicity tolerance

  • Short Communications
  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The performance of two rice varieties selected for sodicity tolerance and sensitivity was studied in pot culture. Tolerant variety CSR-1 showed much better survival, plant growth and yield as compared to the sensitive one (Basmati-370). Sensitive variety was characterized by higher reduction in growth yield, higher Na and lower K concentrations under sodicity in all the plant organs. Highest Na concentrations are in sensitive variety and its distribution is in the order of Senescent yellow leaves > Earheads > Stem > Younger green leaves.

Analysis of different leaves revealed leaf to leaf gradients in terms of Na and K and Na/K ratio were lowest in the youngest leaf and highest in the oldest surviving leaf and these values were much higher in the sensitive variety. This showed that Na ions are mainly localised in the older leaves, which are shed and provide a secondary process of tolerance. Thus the tolerant variety is best marked by maintenance of K levels and much lower increases in Na in all the plant organs, especially earheads, inspite of their growing in highly sodic soils.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Bhattacharyya R K 1976 J. Sec. Exp. Agri. 1, 21–24.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Epstein E 1977In Proceedings of a Workshop on Plant Adaptation to Mineral Stress, Ed. M J Wright, pp 73–82. Beltsville, Maryland.

  3. Flowers T J and Yeo A R 1981 New Phytol. 88, 363–373.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Greenway H'Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 18, 763–769.

  5. Greenway H and Munns R 1980. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 31, 149–190.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Jackson M L 1967 Soil Chemical Analysis, Prentice Hall of India, New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Joshi U C 1976 Ind. J. Plant Physiol. 19, 190–193.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mishra B and Bhattacharyya R K 1980In Proceedings International Symposium on Principles and Practices for Reclamation and Management of Salt-affected Soils, Karnal Feb. 18 to 21 1980 pp. 502–507.

  9. Sharma S K, Joshi Y C and Bal A R 1984 Ind. J. Plant Physiol 27(2), 153–158.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Shannon M C 1978 Agron. J. 70, 719–722.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Van Steveninck R F Met al. 1982 Physiol. Plant. 56, 465–475.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Yeo A R and Flowers T J 1983 Physiol. Plant. 56, 343–348.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Yeo A R and Flowers T J 1983 Physiol. Plant. 59, 189–195.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Yeo A R and Flowers T J 1984In Salinity Tolerance in Plants. Eds. R C Staples and G H Toenniessen. pp 151–170 Wiley Interscience.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sharma, S.K. Mechanism of tolerance in rice varieties differing in sodicity tolerance. Plant Soil 93, 141–145 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02377155

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02377155

Key words

Navigation