Skip to main content
Log in

Low-end specificity of the Beck Depression Inventory

  • Published:
Cognitive Therapy and Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Selection of nondysphoric control subjects on the basis of low Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) scores has become a methodological issue in depression research. Therefore, we examined these questions: (1) Do current selection criteria result in a nondysphoric control group, a subsample of which is characterized by denial, psychopathic, or hypomanic tendencies? (2) Is there an identifiable subgroup of low scorers in which tendencies toward denial, psychopathy, or hypomania are particularly salient? Undergraduates completed the BDI and Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI). As predicted, the proportion of subjects who were elevated on MMPI validity scales was higher in the low-end sample than in dysphorics, and higher in very low scorers than in other low-end subjects. Low-end subjects did not score higher than other subjects on MMPI Psychopathic Deviate (MMPI-Pd) and MMPI Hypomania (MMPI-Ma) subscales. Suggestions for obviating problems associated with low-end specificity are offered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alloy, L. B., & Abramson, L. Y. (1979). Judgement of contingency in depressed and nondepressed students: Sadder but wiser?Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108, 441–485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T. (1972). Measuring depression: The depression inventory. In T. A. Williams, M. M. Katz, & J. A. Shields (Eds.),Recent advances in the psychobiology of the depressive illnesses (pp. 299–302). Washington, D.C.: US. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T., & Beamesderfer, A. (1974). Assessment of depression: The depression inventory. In P. Pichot (Ed.),Modern problems in pharmacopsychiatry (pp. 151–169). Basel, Switzerland: Karger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T., Rush, A. J., Shaw, B. F., & Emery, G. (1979).Cognitive therapy of depression. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T., & Steer, R. A. (1987).Manual for the revised Beck Depression Inventory. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T., Steer, R., & Garbin, M. (1988). Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory: 25 years of evaluation.Clinical Psychology Review, 8, 77–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T., Ward, C. H., Mendelson, M., Mock, J., & Erbaugh, J. (1961). An inventory for measuring depression.Archives of General Psychiatry, 4, 561–571.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Porath, Y. S. (1990). MMPI-2 items.MMPI-2 News and Profiles, 1, 4–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Butcher, J. N. (1989a). The comparability of the MMPI and MMPI-2 scales and profiles.Psychological assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1, 345–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Butcher, J. N. (1989b). The psychometric stability of the rewritten MMPI items.Journal of Personality Assessment, 53, 645–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butcher, J. N., Dahlstrom, W. G., Graham, J. R., Tellegen, A., & Kaemmer, B. (1989).MMPI-2: Manual for administration and scoring. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butcher, J. N., & Tellegen, A. (1978). Common methodological problems in MMPI research.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 620–628.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983).Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coyne, J. C., & Gotlib, I. H. (1983). The role of cognition in depression: A critical appraisal.Psychological Bulletin, 94, 472–505.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1964).The appraisal motive: Studies in evaluative dependence. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlstrom, W. G., & Welsh, G. S. (1960).An MMPI handbook. Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gass, C. S., & Lawhorn, L. (1991). Psychological adjustment following stroke: An MMPI study.Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 3, 628–633.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gotlib, I. H. (1984). Depression and general psychopathology in university students.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 93, 19–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, J. R. (1987).The MMPI. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammen, C. L. (1983).Cognitive and social processes in bipolar affective disorders: A neglected topic. Paper presented at the convention of the American Psychological Association, Anaheim, CA.

  • Hathaway, S. R., & McKinley, J. C. (1943).The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory. New York: The Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooley, J. M., & Richters, J. E. (1992). Allure of self-confirmation: A comment on Swann, Wenzlaff, Krull, and Pelham.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 101, 307–309.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Joiner, T. E., Jr., Alfano, M. S., & Metalsky, G. I. (1992). When depression breeds contempt: Reassurance-seeking, self-esteem, and rejection of depressed college students by their roommates.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 101, 165–173.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Joiner, T. E., Jr., Alfano, M. S., & Metalsky, G. I. (1993). Caught in the crossfire: Depression, self-enhancement, self-consistency, and the response of others.Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 12, 113–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, P. C., Hollon, S. D., Beck, A. T., Hammen, C. L., & Ingram, R. E. (1987). Issues and recommendations regarding use of the Beck Depression Inventory.Cognitive Therapy and Research, 11, 289–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langevin, R., & Stancer, H. (1979). Evidence that depression rating scales primarily measure a social undesirability response set.Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 59, 70–79.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Metalsky, G. I., & Joiner, T. E., Jr. (1992). Vulnerability to depressive symptomatology: A prospective test of the diathesis-stress and causal mediation components of the hopelessness theory of depression.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 667–675.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Metalsky, G. I., Joiner, T. E., Jr., Hardin, T. S., & Abramson, L. Y. (1993). Depressive reactions to failure in a naturalistic setting: A test of the hopelessness and self-esteem theories of depression.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 102, 101–109.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, C. R., Semmel, A., von Baeyer, C., Abramson, L. Y., Metalsky, G. I., & Seligman, M. E. P. (1982). The Attributional Style Questionnaire.Cognitive Therapy and Research, 6, 287–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyter, C. M., & Graham, J. R. (1984). The utility of the subtle and obvious MMPI subscales.Journal of Clinical Psychology, 40, 981–985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swann, W. B., Wenzlaff, R. M., Krull, D. S., & Pelham, B. W. (1992). Allure of negative feedback: Self-verification strivings among depressed persons.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 101, 293–305.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka-Matsumi, J., & Kameoka, V. A. (1986). Reliabilities and concurrent validities of popular self-report measures of depression, anxiety, and social desirability.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54, 328–333.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, L. C. (1991). A comparison oft scores from the MMPI and MMPI-2.Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 3, 688–690.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiener, D. N. (1948). Subtle and obvious keys for the MMPI.Journal of Consulting Psychology, 12, 164–170.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

We are grateful to Steve Finn for comments on an earlier version of this manuscript.

Preparation of this article was supported, in part, by a University Fellowship to Thomas E. Joiner, Jr., from the University of Texas at Austin, and by a grant to Gerald I. Metalsky from the Hogg Foundation for Mental Health. Parts of this article were prepared while Thomas Joiner was on clinical psychology internship at O. E. Teague VA Medical Center, Temple, Texas. Gerald Metalsky is now at Department of Psychology, Lawrence University, Appleton, Wisconsin, 54912-0599.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Joiner, T.E., Schmidt, K.L. & Metalsky, G.I. Low-end specificity of the Beck Depression Inventory. Cogn Ther Res 18, 55–68 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02359395

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02359395

Key Words

Navigation