Skip to main content
Log in

Weaning performance of potato microplants following bacterization and mycorrhization

  • Full Papers
  • Published:
Potato Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Commercial mycorrhizal inoculants andPseudomonas fluorescens isolates CHAO and IP10 have been shown to promote microplant growth during and after weaning. The fluorescent pseudomonads also protected against the soil-borne potato pathogenRhizoctonia solani. The potential benefits of inoculation in vitro with mycorrhizal fungi and helper/biocontrol bacteria are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bonfante, P. & S. Perotto, 1995. Strategies of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi when infecting host plants. Tansley Review no. 82.New Phytologist 130: 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassells, A.C. & C. Walsh, 1994. The influence of the gas permeability of the culture lid on calcium uptake and stomatal function inDianthus microplants.Plant, Cell Tissue & Organ Culture 37: 171–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassells, A.C. & C. Walsh, 1988. CharacteristicsDianthus microplants grown in agar and polyurethane foam using air-tight and water-permeable vessels lids. In: G. Reuther (Ed.), Physiology and control of plant propagation in vitro. European Commission, Luxembourg, pp. 122–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassells, A.C., G.L. Mark & C. Periappuram, 1996. Establishment of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in autotrophic strawbery cultures in vitro. Comparison with inoculation of microplants in vivo.Agronomie 16: 62–632.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dehne, H.W., 1982. Interactions between VAM fungi and plant pathogens.Phytopathology 72: 1115–1119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garbaye, J., 1994. Helper bacteria: a new dimension to the mycorrhizal symbiosis. Tansley Review no. 76.New Phytologist 128: 197–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, E.F., 1993. Plant Propagation by Tissue Culture. Exegetics, Edington, UK, pp. 574.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunewaldt-Stoecker, G., 1997. Problems with the health of in vitro propagatedAnthurium spp. andPhalaenopsis hybrids. In: A.C. Cassells (Ed.), Pathogen and Microbial Contamination Management in Micropropagation. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 363–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linderman, R.G., 1988. Mycorrhizal interactions with the rhizosphere microflora: The mycorrhizosphere effect.Phytopathology 78: 366–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mark, G.L. & A.C. Cassells, 1996. Genotype-dependence in the interaction betweenGlomus fistulosum, Phytophthora fragariae and the wild strawberry (Fragaria vesca).Plant & Soil 185: 233–239.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mark, G.L., J.G. Murphy & A.C. Cassells, 1997. Microbial characterization and preparation of inoculum for in vitro mycorrhization of strawberry in autotrophic culture. In: A.C. Cassells (Ed.), Pathogen and Microbial Contamination Management in Micropropagation. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 345–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J.R. & R.G. Linderman, 1986a. Response of subterranean clover to dual inoculation with vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and a plant growth promoting bacterium,Pseudomonas putida.Soil Biology & Biochemistry 18: 185–190.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J.R. & R.G. Linderman, 1986b. Selective influence on populations of rhizosphere or rhizoplane bacteria and actinomycetes by mycorrhizas formed byGlomus vesiculatum.Soil Biology & Biochemistry 18: 191–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murashige, T. & F. Skoog, 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures.Physiologia Plantarum 15: 473–497.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, C.E., 1987. The water relations of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal systems. In: G.R. Safir (Ed.), Ecophysiology of V A mycorrhizal plants. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, pp. 71–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowak, J., K. Asiedu, S. Bensalim, J. Richards, A. Stewart, C. Smith, D. Stevens & A.V. Sturz, 1997. From laboratory to application: challenges and progress with vitro dual cultures of potato and beneficial bacteria. In: A.C. Cassells (Ed.), Pathogen and Microbial Contamination Management in Micropropagation. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 321–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Gara, F., D.N. Dowling & B. Boesten, 1994. Molecular ecology of rhizosphere microorganisms. VCH, Weinheim, pp. 177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preece, J.E. & E.G. Sutler, 1991. Acclimatization of micropropagated plants. In: P.C. Debergh & R.H. Zimmerman (Eds) Micropropagation: Technology and Application. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 71–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, B., D.E.L. Cooke, J.M. Duncan, C. Leifert, W.A. Breese & R.C. Shattock, 1997. Fungal infections of micropropagated plants at weaning: a problem exemplified by downy mildew inRubus at weaning. In: A.C. Cassells (Ed.), Pathogen and Microbial Contamination Management in Micropropagation. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 309–320.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Duffy, E.M., Hurley, E.M. & Cassells, A.C. Weaning performance of potato microplants following bacterization and mycorrhization. Potato Res 42, 521–527 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02358168

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02358168

Additional keywords

Navigation