Skip to main content
Log in

Managed care for the Medicaid disabled: Effect on utilization and costs

  • Original Article: Medicaid Managed Care
  • Published:
Journal of Urban Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of this study was to describe the effect on health care utilization and costs of a program of managed care for the Medicaid disabled. The study was designed as a pre/post enrollment cohort comparison and was carried out in three Ohio counties. The subjects were disabled Medicaid-insured patients who voluntarily enrolled in a managed care program for at least 6 months between July 1, 1995 and December 31, 1997, and who had (1) at least one Medicaid claim in the 24-months pre-enrollment period and (2) overall satisfactory postenrollment encounter-level data. Ohio Medicaid provided claims and reimbursements (costs) for the pre-enrollment period and encounter-level data for the postenrollment period. Postenrollment costs were estimated by applying category-specific average pre-enrollment costs to postenrollment utilization data. We measured the following per patient-month: (1) trends in category-specific utilization and costs for up to 24 months before and after enrollment, (2) differences in overall and category-specific costs 1 year before and after enrollment, and (3) changes in the distribution of services 1 year before and after enrollment. Utilization categories included inpatient care, outpatient hospital (including emergency department) care, physician services, prescription medications, durable medical equipment and supplies, and home health care. We found that satisfactory encounter data were available in two of three counties. Of 1,179 enrollees, 592 met all inclusion criteria. Before enrollment, utilization and costs were increasing significantly in four of six categories and were unchanging in two. Postenrollment, decreasing utilization was observed for three categories, one remained unchanged, and two were increasing, but from a lower “baseline.” Except for physician services and home health care, there were lower utilization and estimated costs in all categories in the year after enrollment. Estimated inpatient and total costs declined by $155/patient-month (44.9%) and $210/patient-month (37.1%), respectively. Findings were similar across sites. Inpatient care, outpatient hospital care, and prescription medications accounted for 97% of the reductions in estimated costs in the postenrollment period. Among patients voluntarily enrolled for at least 6 months, managed care for the Medicaid disabled was associated with striking decreases in health care utilization and estimated costs. The effect of managed care on these patients' satisfaction, access to specialized services, quality of care, and health outcomes are understood incompletely.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Holahan J, Zuckerman S, Evans A, Rangarajan S. Medicaid managed care in 13 states.Health Aff (Millwood). 1998;17(3):43–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Iglehart JK. The American health care system. Medicaid.N Engl J Med. 1999;340(5):403–408.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Epstein AM. Medicaid managed care and high quality. Can we have both?JAMA. 1997;278(19):1617–1625.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. McCue MJ, Hurley RE, Draper DA, Jurgensen M. Reversal of fortune: commercial HMO's in the Medicaid market.Health Aff (Millwood). 1999;18(1):223–230.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Tanenbaum SJ, Hurley RE. Disability and the managed care frenzy: a cautionary note.Health Aff (Millwood). 1995;14:213–219.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cebul R, Singer ME, Payne S, Gharrity K. Voluntary managed care for the Medicaid disabled in Ohio: evidence and implications of enrollment bias. Report to the Ohio Department of Human Services. October 1998.

  7. Payne S, Cebul RD, Singer ME et al. Comparison of risk-adjustment systems for the Medicaid-eligible disabled population.Med Care. 2000;38:422–432.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kronick R, Dreyfus T, Lee L, Zhou Z. Diagnostic risk adjustment for Medicaid: the disability payment system.Health Care Financing Rev. 1996;17(3):7–33.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ohio Department of Human Services, Bureau of Medicaid Policy. Documentation of ABC Project rate-setting. Columbus, OH. August 1994.

  10. Grossman LK, Rich LN, Hagerty G. Managed care of children with special health care needs: the ABC Program.Clin Pediatr. 1999;38:153–160.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. McCall N, Wrightson C, Paringer L, Trapnell G. Managed Medicaid cost savings: the Arizona experience.Health Aff (Millwood). 1994;13:234–245.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kaye N, ed.Medicaid Managed Care: a Guide for States. 4th ed. National Academy for State Health Policy. 1999.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Supported in part by a grant from the Medicaid Technical Assistance and Policy Program (MEDTAPP), Ohio Department of Human Services, and Ohio Board of Regents.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cebul, R.D., Solti, I., Gordon, N.H. et al. Managed care for the Medicaid disabled: Effect on utilization and costs. J Urban Health 77, 603–624 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02344026

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02344026

Key Words

Navigation