Abstract
Using the framework of patriarchal theory, the present meta-analytic review examined the predicted relation between wife assault and the maintenance of a patriarchal ideology. This relationship was evaluated using three measures of patriarchal ideology: (1) attitudes toward violence, (2) gender attitudes, and (3) gender schemas. Overall, assaultive husbands reported more positive attitudes toward marital violence and lower scores on masculine and feminine gender schema scales than nonassaultive husbands. Methodological factors accounted for the significant heterogeneity among the gender attitude effect estimates for men. A nonsignificant average effect in the males' gender attitude emerged in studies which used husbands' self-report data and case-control comparison groups. In contrast to men, assaulted wives held more feminine gender schema and tended to exhibit more liberal gender attitudes than nonassaulted wives across studies. These meta-analytic findings offer limited support for the ideological component of the patriarchal theory of wife assault and are discussed with respect to their theoretical and methodological implications.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References References marked with an asterisk indicate studies included in the meta-analysis
Anderson, M. L. (1988).Thinking About Women: Sociological Perspectives on Sex and Gender, McMillan Publishing Company, New York.
Apt, C., and Hurlbert, D. F. (1993). The sexuality of women in physically abusive marriages: A comparative study.J. Fam. Viol. 8: 57–69.
Archer, J. (1989). The relationship between gender-role measures: A review.Brit. J. Social Psychol. 28: 173–184.
Barnett, O. J., and Hamberger, L. K. (1992). The assessment of maritally violent men on the California Psychological Inventory.Viol. Vict. 7(1): 15–28.
Barnett, O. J., and Sweet, J. S. (1986).Masculinity, hypermasculinity, and sex-role perceptions in maritally violent men, Unpublished manuscript, Pepperdine University, Malibu, CA.
Baucom, D. H. (1976). Independent masculinity and femininity scales in the California Psychological Inventory.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 44: 876–878.
Baucom, D. H., Notarius, C. I., Burnett, C. K., and McCabe, S. B. (1990). Gender differences and sex-role identity in marriage. In Fincham, F. D., and Bradbury, T. N. (Eds.),The Psychology of Marriage: Basic Issues and Applications, Guilford Press, New York, pp. 150–171.
Beere, C. A., King, D. W., Beere, D. B., and King, L. A. (1984). The Sex-Role Egalitarianism Scale: A measure of attitudes toward equality between the sexes.Sex Roles, 10: 563–576.
Bem, D. J. (1972). Self-perception theory. In Berkowitz, L. (ed.),Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 6, Academic Press, New York, pp. 1–62.
Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 42: 155–162.
Bem, S. L. (1977). On the utility of alternative procedures for assessing psychological androgyny.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 45: 196–205.
Bem, S. L. (1984). Androgyny and gender schema theory: A conceptual and empirical integration. In Sonderegger, T. B. (ed.),Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, Vol. 32, University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, NE, pp. 179–229.
Bem, S. L. (1993).The Lens of Gender, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
Browning, J. J. (1984).Violence against women: Towards a profile of the wife assaulter, Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of British Columbia.
Burger, A. L., and Jacobson, N. S. (1979). The relationship between sex role characteristics, couple satisfaction, and couple problem-solving skills.Am. J. Fam. Ther. 7: 52–60.
Burt, M. R. (1980). Cultural myths and support for rape.J. Personal. Social Psychol. 38(2): 217–230.
Caesar, P. L. (1985, August).The wife beater: Personality and psychosocial characteristics. Paper presented at the American Psychological meetings, Los Angeles, CA.
Campbell, D. T., and Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.Psychological Bull. 56: 81–105.
Campbell, D. T., and Stanley, J. C. (1966).Experimental and Quasi-experimental Designs for Research, Rand McNally, Chicago, IL.
Carrillo, R. A. (1984, August).The male batterer: A multivariate social learning analysis, Paper presented at the Second National Conference for Family Violence Researchers Durham, NH.
Cate, R., and Sugawara, A. I. (1986). Sex role orientation and dimensions of self-esteem among middle adolescents.Sex Roles 15(3–4): 145–158.
Cohen, J. (1977).Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (rev. ed.), Academic Press, New York.
Coleman, K. H., Weinman, M. L., and Hsi, B. P. (1980). Factors affecting conjugal violence.J. Psychol. 105: 97–102.
Comrey, A. L., and Schiebel, D. (1983) Personality test correlates of psychiatric outpatient status.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 51(5): 757–762.
Cook, T. D., and Campbell, D. T. (1979).Quasi-experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings, Rand McNally, Chicago, IL.
Cooper, H., and Hedges, L. V. (eds.) (1994).The Handbook of Research Synthesis, Russell Sage Foundation, New York, NY.
Crossman, R. K., Stitch, S. M., and Bender, M. M. (1990). Sex-role egalitarianism and marital violence.Sex Roles 22(5–6): 293–304.
Dibble, U., and Straus, M. A. (1980). Some social structure determinants of inconsistency between attitude and behavior: The case of family violence.J. Marr. Fam. 42(1): 71–80.
Dobash, R. E., and Dobash, R. P. (1979).Violence Against Wives: A Case Against the Patriarchy, Free Press, New York.
Dutton, R. E., and Hemphill, K. J. (1992). Patterns of socially desirable responding among perpetrators and victims of wife assault.Viol. Vict. 7: 29–39.
Eagly, A. H., and Chaiken, S. (1992).The Psychology of Attitudes, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
Edelson, J. L., Eisikovits, Z., and Guttmann, E. (1985). Men who batter women. A critical review of the evidence.J. Fam. Issues, 6(2): 229–247.
Eisikovitz, Z. C., Edelson, J. L., Guttman, E., and Sela-Amit, M. (1991). Cognitive styles and socialized attitudes of men who batter: Where should we intervene?Fam. Relat. 40: 72–77.
Fazio, R. H., and Zanna, M. P. (1981). Direct experience and attitude-behavior consistency. In Berkowitz, L. (ed.),Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 14, Academic Press, New York, pp. 161–202.
Gauthier, J., and Kyervik, D. (1982). Sex-role identity and self-esteem in female graduate nursing students.Sex Roles 8(1): 45–55.
Gellen, M. I., Hoffman, R. A., Jones, M., and Jones, M. (1984). Abused and non-abused women: MMPI profile differences.Person. Guid. J. 62: 601–603.
Glass, G. V., McGaw, B., and Smith, M. L. (1981).Meta-Analysis of Social Research, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.
Goldstein, D., and Rosenbaum, A. (1985). An evaluation of the self-esteem of maritally violent men.Fam. Relat. 34: 425–428.
Gough, H. G. (1957).California Psychological Inventory, Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc., Palo Alto, CA.
Gravdal, B. W. (1982). A study of locus of control and sex role typology in two groups of battered women. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Washington State University (Dissertation Abstract International, 43(2–B), 556, Order No. 8215143).
Greenblat, C. S. (1983). A hit is a hit is a hit … Or is it? Approval and tolerance of the use of physical force by spouses. In Finkelhor, D., Gelles, R. J., Hotaling, G. T., and Straus, M. A. (eds.),The Dark Side of Families. Current Family Violence Research, Sage, Beverly Hills, pp. 235–260.
Harvey, J. H., Weber, A. L., and Orbuch, T. L. (1990).Interpersonal Accounts. A Social Psychological Perspective, Basil Blackwell, Cambridge, MA.
Hathaway, S. R., and McKinley, J. C. (1975).MMPI Inventory Manual, Psychological Corporation, New York, NY.
Hedges, L. V., and Olkin, I. (1985).Statistical Methods for Meta-analysis, Academic Press, Orlando, FL.
Hofeller, K. H. (1980).Social, psychological, and situational factors in wife abuse, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Claremont Graduate School.
Holtzworth-Munroe, A. (1992). Attributions and maritally violent men: The role of cognition in marital violence. In Harvey, J. H., Orbuch, T. L., and Weber, A. L. (eds.),Attributions, accounts, and close relationships, Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, pp. 165–175.
Hotaling, G. T., and Sugarman, D. B. (1986). An analysis of risk markers in husband to wife violence: The current state of knowledge.Viol. Vict. 1(2): 101–124.
Houts, A. C., Cook, T. D., and Shadish, W. R. (1986). The person-situation debate: A critical multiplist perspective.J. Personal. 54(1): 52–105.
Hunter, J. E., and schmidt, F. L. (1990).Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting Errors and Bias in Research Findings, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
Ickes, W. (1985). Sex-role influences on compatibility in relationships. In Ickes, W. (ed.),Compatible and Incompatible Relationships, Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 187–208.
Ickes, W. (1993). Traditional gender roles: Do they make, and then break, our relationships?J. Social Issues 49(3): 71–85.
Johnson, D. (1989).DSTAT: Software for the Meta-analytic Review of Research Literatures, L. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
Johnston, M. E. (1984, August).Correlates of early violence experiences among men who are abusive toward female mates, Paper presented at the Second National Conference for Family Violence Researchers, Durham, NH.
Johnston, M. E. (1988). Correlates of early violence experiences among men who are abuse toward female mates. In Hotaling, G. T., Finkelhor, D., Kirkpatrick, J. T., and Straus, M. A. (eds.),Family Abuse and Its Consequences. New directions in Research, Sage, Newbury Park, CA, pp. 192–202.
Kalin, R. (1979). Method for scoring androgyny as a continuous variable.Psychological Rep. 44: 1205–1206.
Kalin, R., and Tilby, P. J. (1978). Development and validation of a sex-role ideology scale.Psychological Rep. 42: 731–738.
Kurz, D. (1989). Social science perspective on wife abuse: Current debates and future directions.Gender Soc. 3: 489–505.
LaViolette, A. D., Barnett, O. W., and Nyland, (1985, April).Wife abusers' predispositions on attitudes toward women scale, Paper presented at the meeting of the Western Psychological Association, San Jose, CA.
LaViolette, a. D., Barnett, O. W., and Miller, C. L. (1984, August).A classification of wife abuse on the Bem Sex-Role Inventory, Paper presented at the Second National Conference for Family Violence Researchers, Durham, NH.
Levinson, D. (1989).Family Violence in Cross-cultural Perspective, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
Light, R. J., and Pillemer, D. B. (1984).Summing Up: The Science of Reviewing Research, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Long, V. O. (1986). Relationship of masculinity to self-esteem and self-acceptance in female professionals, college students, clients and victims of domestic violence.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 54(3): 323–327.
Lopez, S. C. (1981).Marital satisfaction and wife abuse as a function of sex-role identity, self-esteem, and interpersonal style, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Georgia State University. (Dissertation Abstracts International, 1982,42(11-B), 4560–4561, Order No. DA8209780).
Lyman, S. M., and Scott, M. B. (1970).A Sociology of the Absurd, Appleton-Century-Croft, New York, NY.
Margolin, G. (1988). Interpersonal and intrapersonal factors associated with marital violence. In Hotaling, G. T., Finkelhor, D., Kirkpatrick, J. T., and Straus, M. A. (eds.),Family Abuse and Its Consequences: New Directions in Research, Sage, Newbury Park, CA, pp. 203–217.
Mason, K. O. (1975).Sex-Role Iterms and Scales from U.S. Sample Surveys, NIMH, Rockville, MD.
Millet, K. (1969).Sexual Politics, Avon Books, New York.
Moore, J. H. (1983).Sex-role stereotyping in battered women: Responses to the Bem sex-role inventory, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Virginia Commonwealth University (Dissertation Abstracts International, 1982,43(5-B), 1663–1664, Order No. DA8223350).
Mosher, D. L., and Sirkin, M. (1984). Measuring a macho personality constellation.J. Ed. Psychol. 18: 150–163.
Moskowitz, D. S. (1986). Comparison of self-reports reports by knowledgeable informants, and behavioral observation data.J. Personal., 54(1): 265–317.
Neidig, P. H., Friedman, D. H., and Collins, B. S. (1985). Attitudinal characteristics of males who have engaged in spouse abuse.J. Fam. Viol. 1(3): 223–234.
Pagelow, M. (1984).Fam. Viol., Praeger, New York.
Read, S. J. (1992). Constructing accounts: The role of explanatory coherence. In McLaughlin, M. L., Cody, M. J., and Read, S. J. (eds.),Explaining One's Self to Others: Reason-Giving in a Social Context, L. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 3–19.
Riggs, D. S., and O'Leary, K. D. (1989). A theoretical model of courtship aggression. In Pirog-Good, M. A., and Stets, J. E. (eds.),Violence in Dating Relationships: Emerging Social Issues Praeger, New York, pp. 53–71.
Rosenbaum, A. (1986). Of men, macho, and marital violence.J. Fam. Viol. 1(2): 121–129.
Rosenbaum, A., and O'Leary, K. D. (1981). Marital violence: Characteristics of abusive couples.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol., 49(1): 63–71.
Rosenthal, R. (1984).Meta-analytic Procedures for Social Research, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
Saunders, D. G., Lynch, A. B., Grayson, M., and Linz, D. (1987). The inventory of beliefs about wife beating: The construction and initial validation of a measure of beliefs and attitudes.Viol. Vict. 2(1): 39–57.
Saunders, D. G., and Size, P. B. (1986). Attitudes about woman abuse among police officers, victims and victim advocates.J. Interpers. Viol. 1(1): 25–42.
Sayers, S., and Baucom, D. H. (1989).Sex role identity and communication among maritally distressed couples, Unpublished manuscript, Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.
Schechter, S. (1982).Women and Male Violence, South End Press, Boston, MA.
Semmelman, P. S. (1982).Battered and non-battered women: A comparison, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University (Dissertation Abstracts International, 1983,43(8-B), 2716–2717, Order No. DA8300345).
Smith, M. D. (1990). Patriarchal ideology and wife beating: A test of a feminist hypothesis.Viol. Vict. 5(4): 257–274.
Spence, J. T. (1984). Gender identity and its implications for the concepts of masculinity and femininity. In Sonderegger, T. B. (ed.),Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, Vol. 32, University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, NE, (pp. 59–95)
Spence, J. T. (1993). Gender-related traits and gender ideology: Evidence for a multifactorial theory.J. Personal. Social Psychol. 64: 624–635.
Spence, J. T., and Helmreich, R. L. (1972). The attitude toward woman scale: An objective instrument to measure attitudes toward the rights and roles of women in contemporary society.JSAS Cat. Select. Doc. Psychol. 2(66), (Ms. No. 153)
Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R. L., and Stapp, J. (1973). A short version of the attitude toward women scale (AWS).Bull. Psychon. Soc. 2(4): 219–220.
Spence, J. T., Helmriech, R. L., and Stapp, J. (1974). The personal attribute questionnaire: A measure of sex-role stereotypes and masculinity and femininity.JSAS Cat. Select. Doc. Psychol. 4(43), (Ms. No. 617)
Stark, E., and Flitcraft, A. (1988). Violence among intimates. An epidemiological review. In Van Hasselt, V. B., Morrison, R. L., Bellack, A. S., and Hersen, M. (eds.),Handbook of Family Violence, Plenum Press, New York, NY, pp. 293–317.
Sugarman, D. B., and Hotaling, G. T. (1989). Dating violence: Prevalence, context and risk markers. In Pirog-Good, M. A., and Stets, J. E. (eds.),Violence in Dating Relationships: Emerging Social Issues, Praeger, New York, NY, pp. 3–32.
Walby, S. (1990).Theorizing Patriarchy, Basil Blackwood Inc., Cambridge, MA.
Walker, L. E. (1983).The Battered Woman Syndrome, Springer Publishers, New York, NY.
Warren, J., and Lanning, W. (1992). Sex-role beliefs, control, and social isolation of battered women.J. Fam. Viol. 7(1): 1–8.
Webb, E. J., Campbell, D. T. Schwartz, R. D., and Sechrest, L. (1966).Unobtrusive Measures, Rand McNally, Skokie, IL.
Whitley, B. E., and Gridley, B. E. (1993). Sex role orientation, self-esteem, and depression: A latent variable analysis.Personal. Social Psychol. Bull. 19(4): 363–369.
Yllo, K. A. (1983). Sexual equality and violence against wives in American states.J. Comp. Fam. Studies 14: 67–85.
Yllo, K. A., and Bograd, M. (Eds.) (1988).Feminist Perspectives on Wife Abuse, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.
Yllo, K. A., and Straus, M. A. (1990). Patriarchy and violence against wives: The impact of structural and normative factors. In Straus, M. A., and Gelles, R. J. (eds.),Physical Violence in American Families: Risk Factors and Adaptations to Violence in 8,145 Families, Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, NJ, pp. 383–399.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sugarman, D.B., Frankel, S.L. Patriarchal ideology and wife-assault: A meta-analytic review. J Fam Viol 11, 13–40 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02333338
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02333338