Skip to main content
Log in

A co-evolutionary model for supporting the emergence of authenticity

  • Research
  • Published:
Educational Technology Research and Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to share our experiences using emerging technologies to create an authentic learning context where preservice teachers at a university and practicing K-12 teachers collaborate in the conduct of real-world (as opposed to “textbook”) tasks. In this paper, we demonstrate and evaluate the design of professional development that involved a partnership between two universities and eight surrounding K-12 schools. This partnership provides the foundation for supporting a learning community of preservice and practicing teachers that situates in collaborative practices that are both authentic and valuable to all involved. Specifically, we studied how issues of ownership, power, authenticity, and collaboration contribute to students' successes and the success of the program through four case studies. We also explored how asynchronous conferencing tools might be used to facilitate communication across geographic and chronological boundaries, breaking down traditional barriers to distributed communities of practice and making possible the creation of a co-evolutionary model for supporting the emergence of a context that was authentic to both preservice and in-service teachers. In contrast to claims that suggest authenticity for an individual can be prescribed to a learner by the instructor, we deny the legitimacy of preauthentication. Instead, an assumption underlying this research is that authenticity is an emergent process that is actualized through individuals' participation in tasks and practices of value to themselves and to a community of practice. The co-evolutionary model for supporting the emergence of authenticity described in this study provides a means of overcoming some of the challenges associated with simulation and participation models for establishing authentic learning experiences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Banathy B.H. (1991).A systems view of education. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barab, S.A. (1999). Ecologizing instruction through integrated units.The Middle School Journal, 30, 21–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barab, S.A., Cherkes-Julkowski, M., Swenson, R., Garrett, S., Shaw, R.E., & Young, M. (1999). Principles of self-organization: Ecologizing the learner-facilitator system.The Journal of The Learning Sciences, 8(3, 4), 349–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barab, S.A., & Duffy, T. (2000). Architecting participatory learning environments. To appear in D. Jonassen & S. Land (Eds.),Theoretical foundations of learning environments. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barab, S.A., & Hay, K. (in press). Doing science at the elbows of scientists: Issues related to the Scientist Apprentice Camp. To appear in theJournal of Research on Science Teaching.

  • Barab, S.A., Hay, K., & Duffy, T. (1998). Grounded constructions and how technology can help.Technology Trends, 43(2), 15–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barab, S.A., & Kirshner, D. (in press). Introduction to the special issue: Methodologies for capturing learner practices occurring as part of dynamic learning environments. To appear in theJournal of The Learning Sciences.

  • Barab, S.A., & Landa, A. (1997). Designing interdisciplinary anchors.Educational Leadership, 54(6), 52–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertalanffy, L. (1952).Problems of life. London: Watts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A.L., & Campione, J.C. (1990). Communities of learning and thinking, or a context by any other name.Contributions to Human Development, 21, 108–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J.S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning.Educational Researcher, 18, 32–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Case, C.W., Norlander, K.A., & Reagan, T.G. (1993). Cultural transformation in an urban professional development center: Policy implications for school-university collaboration.Educational Policy, 7(1), 40–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, P., & Yackel, E. (1996). Constructivist, emergent, and sociocultural perspectives in the context of developmental research.Educational Psychologist, 31, 175–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1990). Anchored instruction and its relationship to situated cognition.Educational Researcher, 19, 2–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1993). Anchored Instruction and situated cognition revisited.Educational Technology, 33, 52–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A., Brown, J.S., & Newman, S.E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L.B. Resnick (Ed.),Knowing, learning and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453–494). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1897). My pedagogical creed.The School Journal, 543, 77–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1963).Experience & education. New York: Collier MacMillan. (Original work published 1938)

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, T.M., & Jonassen, D.H. (1992). Constructivism: New implications for instructional technology. In T. Duffy & D. Jonassen (Eds.),Constructivism and the technology of instruction (pp. 1–16). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, T.M., Lowyck, J., & Jonassen, D.H. (Eds.), (1992).Designing environments for constructivist learning. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, L.D. (1995). The design and analysis of a mathematical microworld.Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12, 77–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engestrom, Y. (1993). Developmental studies of work as a testbench of activity theory: The case of primary care medical practice. In S. Chaiklin & J. Lave (Eds.),Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context (pp. 64–103). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evenson, D.H., & Hmelo, C.E. (Eds.). (in press).Problem-based learning: A research perspective on learning interactions. Mahway, NJ: Erlbaum.

  • Fodor, J. (1980).Language of thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1985).The mind's new science. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J.J. (1986).The ecological approach to visual perception. Hilisdale, NJ: Lawrence Eribaum Associates, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B.G., & Strauss, A.L. (1967).The discovery of grounded theory. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, K.C., & Gilbert, S.W. (1995). Great expectations.Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 27(2), 8–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greeno, J. (1998). The situativity of knowing, learning, and research.American Psychologist, 53, 5–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greeno, J.G. (1997). Response: On claims that answer the wrong questions.Educational Researcher, 36, 5–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guba, E.G., & Lincoln, Y.S. (1983). Epistemological and methodological bases of naturalistic inquiry. In G.F. Madaus, M.S. Scriven, and D.L. Stufflebeam (Eds.),Evaluation models: Viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation (pp. 311–334). Boston, MA: Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannafin, M.J., Hall, C., Land, S.M., & Hill, J.R. (1994). Learning in open-ended environments: Assumptions, methods, and implications.Educational Technology, 34, 48–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, S.B., & McLaughlin, M.W. (1994). The best of both worlds: Connecting schools and community youth organizations for all-day, all-year learning.Educational Administration Quarterly;30(3), 278–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hmelo, C., & Evensen, D. (Eds.), (in press).Problem-based learning: Gaining insights on learning interactions through multiple methods of inquiry. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Eribaum Associates, Inc.

  • Hutchins, C.L. (1996).Systemic thinking: Solving complex problems. Aurora, CO: Professional Development Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins, E. (1993). Learning to navigate. In S. Chaiklin & J. Lave (Eds.),Understanding practice (pp. 35–63). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelso, S. (1995).Dynamic patters: The self-organization of brain and behavior. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirshner, D., & Whitson, J.A. (Eds.). (1997).Situated cognition: Social, semiotic, and psychological perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirshner, D., & Whitson, J.A. (1998). Obstacles to understanding cognition as situated.Educational Researcher, 27(8), 22–28.d

    Google Scholar 

  • Knorr-Cetina, K.D. (1981).The manufacture of knowledge: An essay on the constructivist and contextual nature of science. Oxford, England: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kommers, P.A.M., Grabinger, R.S., and Dunlap J.C. (Eds.). (1996).Hypermedia learning environments: instructional design and integration. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koschmann, T. (Ed.). (1996).CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm. Malwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koschmann, T., Kelson, A.C., Feltovich, P.J., & Barrows, H.S. (1996). Computer-supported problem-based learning: A principled approach to the use of computers in collaborative learning. In T. Koschmann (Ed.)CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm (pp. 83–124). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lampert, M. (1990). When the problem is not the question and the solution is not the answer: Mathematical knowing and teaching.American Educational Research Journal, 27, 29–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1987).Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Milton Keynes, England: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J. (1988).Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J. (1993). Situating learning in communities of practice. In L.B. Resnick, J.M. Levine, & S.D. Teasley (Eds.),Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 17–36). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J. (1997). The culture of acquisition and the practice of understanding. In D. Kirshner & J.A. Whitson (Eds.),Situated cognition: Social, semiotic, and psychological perspectives (pp. 63–82). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991).Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, J.A., Riel, M., Miyake, N., & Cohen, M. (1987). Education on the electronic frontier: Teleapprenticeships in globally distributed educational contexts.Contemporary Educational Psychology, 12, 254–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln Y.S., & Guba, E.G. (1985).Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milter, R.G., & Stinson, J.E. (1995). Educating leaders for the new competitive environment. In Gijselaers, G., Tempelaar, S., Keizer S. (Eds.),Educational innovation in economics and business administration: The case of problem-based learning. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicaise, M., & Barnes, D. (1996). The union of technology, constructivism, and teacher education.Journal of Teacher Education, 47, 205–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petraglia, J. (1998).Reality by design: The rhetoric and technology of authenticity in education. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrie, H.G. (Ed.). (1995).Professionalization, partnership, and power: Building professional development schools. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prigogine, I. (1978). Time, structure, and fluctuations.Science, 201, 777–785.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prigogine, I., & Stengers, I. (1984).Order out of chaos: Man's dialogue with nature. New York: Bantam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radinsky, J. Bouillion, L., Hanson, K., Gomez, L., Vemeer, D., & Fishman, B. (1998, April).A framework for authenticity: Mutual benefits partnerships. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.

  • Resnick, L.B. (1987). Learning in school and out.Educational Researcher, 16, 13–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson-Koehler, V. (1988). Barriers to effective supervision of student teaching.Journal of Teacher Education, 39, 28–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, B., & Lave, J. (1984).Everyday cognition: Its development in social context. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W.-M. (1995). Knowledge diffusion in a grade 4–5 classroom during a unit of civil engineering: An analysis of a classroom community in terms of its changing resources and practices.Cognition and Instruction, 14, 170–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W.-M. (1998).Designing communities. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W.-M., & Bowen, G.M. (1996). Knowing and interacting: A study of culture, practices, and resources in a grade 8 open-inquiry science classroom guided by a cognitive apprenticeship metaphor.Cognition and Instruction, 13, 73–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savery, J., & Duffy, T. (1996). Problem based learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework. In B. Wilson (Ed.),Constructivist learning environments: Case studies in instructional design (pp. 135–148). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge-building communities.The Journal of The Learning Sciences, 3, 265–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeld, A. (1996). In fostering communities of inquiry, must it matter that the teacher knows the “answer”?For the Learning of Mathematics, 16(3), 11–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrum, L., & Dehoney, J. (1998). Meeting the future: A teacher educational program joins the information age.Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 6(1), 23–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scriven, M.S. (1983). Evaluation methodologies. In G.F. Madaus, M.S. Scriven, and D.L. Stufflebeam (Eds.),Evaluation models: Viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation (pp. 229–260). Boston, MA: Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. (1994).The Fifth discipline fieldbook: Strategies and tools for building a learning organization. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, J. (1995). The state of teacher training: The results of the first national survey of technology staff development in schools.Electronic Learning, 14(8), 43–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sloffer, S.J., Dueber, B., & Duffy, T.M. (1999, January). Using asynchronous conferencing to promote critical thinking: Two implementations in higher education.Proceedings of the 32nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Maui, Hawaii.

  • Swenson, R. (1996).Spontaneous order, evolution, and natural law: An introduction to the physical basis for an ecological psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swenson, R. (1997a). Thermodynamics and evolution. In G. Greenberg and M. Haraway (Eds.),Handbook of comparative psychology (pp. 217–228). Garland Publishing, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swenson, R. (1997b). Autocatakinetics, evolution, and the law of maximum entropy production: A principled foundation toward the study of human ecology. In Lee Freese (Ed.),Advances in human ecology, Vol. 6 (pp. 1–46). Greenwich, CT.

  • Vera, A.H., & Simon, H.A. (1993). Situated action: A symbolic interpretation.Cognitive Science, 17, 7–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1998).Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, A.N. (1929).The aims of education and other essays. New York: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, B. (Ed.), (1996).Constructivist learning environments: Case studies in instructional design. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, M.F., Kulikowich, J.M., & Barab, S.A. (1997). The unit of analysis for situated assessment.Instructional Science, 25, 133–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zammit, S.A. (1992). Factors facilitating or hindering the use of computers in schools.Educational Research, 34(1), 57–66.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barab, S.A., Squire, K.D. & Dueber, W. A co-evolutionary model for supporting the emergence of authenticity. ETR&D 48, 37–62 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02313400

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02313400

Keywords

Navigation