Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of injection conditions in reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography of chlorophylls and carotenoids

  • Originals
  • Published:
Chromatographia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The RP-HPLC analysis of chlorophylls, their degradation products (chloropigments) and carotenoids is very sensitive to the nature of the injection solvent. The effect of sample-solvent interaction can result in the production of distorted, or even false, peaks that could be erroneously interpreted as “pigment like” or as poor chromatographic resolution. The previously suggested theoretical explantion, based on differences in solvent characteristics as expressed by the Polarity Index (P′) or even by the more precise solvent strength parameter for reversed-phase systems (S) we use, was unsatisfactory. The problem seems more complex, with other parameters such as injection volume and solute concentration or solvent selectivity also playing a role. As a practical consequence, however, suggesions are made for optimum injection conditions. Also, the presence of ion-pairing reagents in the injection solvent is demonstrated to be unnecessary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. W. A. Svec, in “The porphyrins”, D. Dolphin, ed., Academic Press, London, 1978; vol. V, p. 341.

    Google Scholar 

  2. T. W. Goodwin, G. Britton, in “Plant Pigments”. J. W. Goodwin, ed. Academic Press, London, 1988; p. 62.

    Google Scholar 

  3. S. Roy, J. Chromatogr.391, 19 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  4. S. W. Wright, J. D. Shearer, Chromatogr.294, 281 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. Zapata, Ana M. Ayala, J. M. Franco, J. L. Garrido, Chromatographia23, 26 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  6. W. W. C. Gieskes, G. W. Kraay, A. Nontij, D. Setiapermana, A. Sutomo, Neth. J. Sea Res.22, 123 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  7. L. R. Snyder, J. J. Kirkland, in “Introduction to Modern Liquid Chromatography”, 2nd ed., New York, 1979; p. 246.

  8. M. Tsimidou, R. Macrae, J. Chromatogr. Sci.23, 155 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  9. F. Khachik, G. R. Beecher, J. T. Vanderslice, G. Furrow, Anal. Chem.60, 807 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  10. L. R. Snyder, J. W. Dolan, J. R. Gant, J. Chromatogr.165, 3 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. F. C. Mantoura, C. A. Llewellyn, Anal. Chim. Acta151, 297 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  12. C. K. Lim, T. J. Peters, J. Chromatogr.316, 397 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  13. C. Horvath, W. Melander, I. Molnar, P. Molnar, Anal. Chem.49, 2295 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  14. L. Rohrschneider, Anal. Chem.45, 1241 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zapata, M., Garrido, J.L. Influence of injection conditions in reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography of chlorophylls and carotenoids. Chromatographia 31, 589–594 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02279480

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02279480

Key Words