Skip to main content
Log in

A comparison of the effects of scopolamine and diazepam on working memory

  • Rapid Communications
  • Published:
Psychopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two drug models of memory dysfunction, namely the benzodiazepine and the cholinergic models, have emerged from the considerable number of studies which have examined drug effects on information processing. The reported impairments produced by administration of compounds from these two families appear to be more similar than dissimilar, and to date, direct comparisons on traditional memory tasks have failed to differentiate the models. This study compared the effects of diazepam and scopolamine on tasks associated with separable components of working memory. The results indicate that this model also fails to discriminate between the drug models; both compounds selectively impaired tasks associated with the central executive mechanism and failed to disrupt tasks associated with the articulatory loop or the visuospatial scratchpad.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Baddeley AD (1986) Working memory. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley AD, Hitch G (1974) Working memory. In: Bower G (ed) Recent advances in learning and motivation, vol 8. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Birch B, Curran HV (1990) The differential effects of flumazenil on the psychomotor and amnesic actions of midazolam. Psychopharmacol 4:29–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Broks P, Preston GC, Traub M, Poppleton P, Ward C, Stahl S (1988) Modelling dementia: effects of scopolamine on memory and attention. Neuropsychologia 26:685–700

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown J, Lewis V, Brown MW, Horn G, Boews JB (1982) A comparison between transient amnesias induced by two drugs (diazepam and lorazepam) and amnesia of organic origin. Neuropsychologia 20:55–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Caine ED, Weingartner H, Ludlow CL, Cudahy EA, Wehry S (1981) Qualitative analysis of scopolamine-induced amnesia. Psychopharmacology 74:74–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Crow TJ, Grove-White IG (1973) An analysis of the learning deficit following hyoscine administration to man. Br J Pharmacol 49:322–327

    Google Scholar 

  • Curran HV (1991) Benzodiazepines, memory and mood: a review. Psychopharmacology (in press)

  • Curran HV, Schifano F, Lader M (1991) Models of memory dysfunction? A comparison of the effects of scopolamine and lorazepam on memory, psychomotor performance and mood. Psychopharmacology 103:83–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Drachman DA, Leavitt J (1974) Human memory and the cholinergic system. Arch Neurol 30:113–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Frith CD, Richardson JTE, Samuel M, Crow TJ, McKenna PJ (1984) The effects of intravenous diazepam and hyoscine on human memory. Q J Exp Psychol 36A:133–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghonheim MM, Mewaldt SP (1975) Effects of diazepam and scopolamine on storage, retrieval and organisational processes in memory. Psychopharmacologia 44:257–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghonheim MM, Mewaldt SP (1977) Studies on human memory: the interactions of diazepam. Scopolamine and physostigmine. Psychopharmacology 52:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghonheim MM, Hinrichs JV, Mewaldt SP (1984) Dose-response analysis of the behavioural effects of diazepam: I. Learning and Memory. Psychopharmacology 82:291–295

    Google Scholar 

  • Hommer DW, Breier A, Paul SM, Davis M, Weingartner H (1986) Ro 15-1788, a specific benzodiazepine antagonist, blocks the sedative, anxiolytic and attentional but not the amnestic effects of diazepam in humans. Abstracts of the 25th ACNP Annual Meeting in Washington, 1986

  • Kopelman MD, Corn TH (1988) Cholinergic “blockade” as a model for cholinergic depletion. Brain 111:1079–1110

    Google Scholar 

  • Mewaldt SP, Hinrichs JV, Ghonheim MM (1982) Diazepam and memory: support for a duplex model of memory. Mem Cognit 11:557–564

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Boyle C, Lambe R, Darragh A, Taffe W, Brick I, Kenny M (1983) Ro 15-1788 antagonizes the effects of diazepam in man without affecting its bioavailability. Br J Anaesth 25:493–499

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson RC (1977) Scopolamine-induced learning failures in man. Psychopharmacologia 52:283–289

    Google Scholar 

  • Preston G, Ward C, Lines C, Poppleton P, Haigh J, Traub M (1989) Scopolamine and benzodiazepine models of dementia: cross-reversals by Ro 15-1788 and physostigmine. Psychopharmacology 98:487–494

    Google Scholar 

  • Rusted JM (1988) Dissociative effects of scopolamine on working memory in healthy young volunteers. Psychopharmacology 96:487–492

    Google Scholar 

  • Rusted JM, Warburton DM (1988) Effects of scopolamine on working memory in healthy volunteers. Psychopharmacology 96:145–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Rusted JM, Warburton DM (1989) Effects of scopolamine on verbal memory: evidence for failure at retrieval not acquisition. Neuropsychobiology 21:76–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor J, Hunt E, Coggan P (1987) Effect of diazepam on the speed of mental rotation. Psychopharmacology 91:369–371

    Google Scholar 

  • Warburton DM, Wesnes K (1984) Drugs and human information processing. In: Nicholson J, Beloff H (eds) Psychology Survey No. 5. British Psychological Society, Leicester

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rusted, J.M., Eaton-Williams, P. & Warburton, D.M. A comparison of the effects of scopolamine and diazepam on working memory. Psychopharmacology 105, 442–445 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02244443

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02244443

Key words

Navigation