Skip to main content
Log in

Molar enamel thickness in European Miocene and extant hominoidea

  • Published:
International Journal of Primatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Based on a roentgenographic analysis, the molar enamel of certain European Miocene dryopithecines is absolutely thick (r=1.03–1.30 mm in thickness); the molar enamel of certain European pliopithecines is thin (r=0.32–0.82 mm thick). The rank order for enamel thickness in extant hominoids (from thickest to thinnest) is confirmed to beHomo, Pongo, Gorilla, Pan, andHylobates. There is a great deal of enamel thickness variability within the great ape sample. Extant analogues suggest that dryopithecines were probably adapted to a frugivorous/gramnivorous dietary regimen, while pliopithecines were probably better suited to folivory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrews, P., and Martin, L. (1987). Cladistic relationshps of extant and fossil hominoids.J. Hum. Evol. 16: 101–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beynon, A. D., and Wood, B. A. (1984). Preliminary observations on enamel structure and thickness in fossil hominids.J. Dent. Research 63: 505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beynon, A. D., and Wood, B. A. (1986). Variations in enamel thickness and structure in East African hominids.Am. J. Phys. Anthrop. 70: 177–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlberg, A. A. (1963). Dentition of the American Indian. In Brothwell, D. R. (ed.),Dental Anthropology, Pergamon, Oxford, pp. 149–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gantt, D. G. (1981). Enamel thickness and Neogene hominoid evolution.Am. J. Phys. Anthrop. 54: 222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gantt, D. G. (1982). Hominid evolution—a tooth's inside view. In Kurten, B. (ed.),Teeth: Form, Function and Evolution, Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 107–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gantt, D. G. (1983). The enamel of Neogene hominoids: Structural and phyletic implications. In Ciochon, R. L., and Corruccini, R. S. (eds.),New Interpretations of Ape and Human Ancestry, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 249–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gantt, D. G. (1986). Enamel thickness and ultrastructure in hominoids: With reference to form, function, and phylogeny. In Swindler, D. R., and Erwin, J. (eds.),Comparative Primate Biology, Vol. 1. Systematics, Evolution, and Anatomy, Alan R. Liss, New York, pp. 453–475.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, R. (1981). The nut-crackers—a new theory of the adaptations of the Ramapithecinae.Am. J. Phys. Anthrop. 55: 141–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, J., and Pilbeam, D. (1986). The dryopithecines: Taxonomy, comparative anatomy, and phylogeny of Miocene large hominoids. In Swindler, D. R., and Erwin, J. (eds.),Comparative Primate Biology, Vol. 1. Systematics, Evolution, and Anatomy, Alan R. Liss, New York, pp. 361–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, L. (1985). Significance of enamel thickness in hominoid evolution.Nature 314: 260–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molnar, S., and Gantt, D, (1977). Functional implications of primate enamel thickness.Am. J. Phys. Anthrop. 46: 447–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagatoshi, K. (1984).Systematics and Paleoecology of European Tertiary Apes. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Chicago, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagatoshi, K. (1987). Miocene hominoid environments of Europe and Turkey.Palaeogeog. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 61: 145–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pilbeam, D. (1986). Hominoid evolution and hominoid origins.Am. Anthropol. 88: 295–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shellis, P., and Hiiemae, K. (1984). Molar enamel thickness and structure in primates and insectivores in relation to diet.J. Dent. Res. 63: 505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons, E. L., and Pilbeam, D. (1972). Hominoid paleoprimatology. In Tuttle, R. H. (ed.),The Functional and Evolutionary Biology of Primates, Aldine, Chicago, pp. 36–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperber, G. H. (1985). Comparative primate dental enamel thickness: A radiodontological study. In Tobias, P. V. (ed.),Hominid Evolution: Past, Present and Future, Alan R. Liss, New York, pp. 443–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szalay, F. S., and Delson, E. (1979).Evolutionary History of the Primates, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, R. M. S. (1978).Variation in Morphology of Teeth, Charles C Thomas, Springfield, Ill.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nagatoshi, K. Molar enamel thickness in European Miocene and extant hominoidea. International Journal of Primatology 11, 283–295 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02193001

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02193001

Key Words

Navigation