Skip to main content
Log in

Transit pricing research

A review and synthesis

  • Published:
Transportation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Several decades of research on transit pricing have provided clear insights into how riders respond to price changes in both the transit and automobile sectors. For the most part, riders are insensitive to changes in either fare levels, structures, or forms of payments, though this varies considerably among user groups and operating environments. Since riders are approximately twice as sensitive to changes in travel time as they are to changes in fares, a compelling argument can be made for operating more premium quality transit services at higher prices. Such programs could be supplemented by vouchers and concessionary programs to reduce the burden of higher fares on low-income users. Also, cross-elasticity research suggests that higher automobile prices would have a significantly greater affect on ridership than lower fares. Most research on transit fare structures shows that the common practice of flat fares is highly inequitable, penalizing short-distance and off-peak users. Free fare programs have proven quite costly for each new transit user attracted and have rarely lured motorists to transit. Free fares limited to downtowns have been more successful than systemwide free fare programs. While prepayment schemes have met with success in the U.S. and Europe, honor fares have suffered from excessive revenue losses in at least one case in the U.S. Some of the more noteworthy fare policy successes in North America have been Bridgeport's combined pass-fare program, Allentown's deep discounts, Ottawa's major fare reduction and differentiation, and Columbus's substantial midday discount. As paratransit and other new transit alternatives to conventional bus continue to emerge, new, more differentiated fare practices can be expected in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abe M (1973) Pricing and welfare in urban transportation. Traffic Quarterly 27: 419–429

    Google Scholar 

  • Altshuler A (1981) The Urban Transportation System: Politics and Policy Innovation. Cambridge: MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  • American Public Transit Association (1988) Transit Fact Book. Washington, D.C.: American Public Transit Association

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum H J (1973) Free public transport. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 7: 3–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonsall J A (1988) Toward a fairer and more effective fare system? The Ottawa experience of time of day service. UITP Revue 37(1): 11–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Cervero R (1981) Flat versus differentiated transit pricing: What's a fair fare? Transportation 10: 211–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Cervero R & Wachs M (1982) An answer to the transit crisis: The case for distance-based transit fares. Journal of Contemporary Studies 5: 59–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Cervero R (1983a) Peak load transit pricing: Theory and practice. Journal of Advanced Transportation 3: 209–230

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1983b) Perceptions of who benefits from public transit. Transportation Research Record 936: 15–19

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1985) Examining recent transit fare innovations in the U.S. Transportation Policy and Decision Making 3: 23–41

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1986a) Time-of-day transit pricing: Comparative U.S. and international experiences. Transport Reviews 6: 347–364

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1986b) Urban transit in Canada: Integration and innovation at its best.Transportation Quarterly 40: 293–316

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins P (1984) Fares simplication and integration in London Transport. The Sixteenth Annual Seminar on Public Transport Operations Research. The University of Leeds

  • Collings P H & Lindsay J F (1972) Analysis of Effect of September 1969 Fares Revision on Work Journeys. London: London Transport Executive, Operation Research Report R181

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummings C P, Fairhurst M, LaBelle S & Stuart D (1989) Market segmentation of transit fare elasticities. Transportation Quarterly 43(3): 407–420

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtin J (1968) Effects of fares on transit riding. Highway Research Record 213: 8–18

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLeuw, Cather & Company (1979) Evaluation of the Denver RTD and Trenton Off-Peak Fare-Free Transit Demonstration. Cambridge, MA: U.S. Department of Transportation, Transportation Systems Center

    Google Scholar 

  • Domencich T A, Kraft F & Valette J (1968) Estimation of urban passenger travel behavior: An economic demand model. Highway Research Record 238: 64–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnelley E (1976) Preference elasticities of fare changes by demographic groups. Transportation Research Record 589: 30–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Doxsey L B & Spear B D (1981) Systemwide Off-Peak Free-Fare Transit: A Comparison of Two Demonstrations. Cambridge: U.S. Department of Transportation, Transportation Systems Center

    Google Scholar 

  • Dygert P, Holee J & Hill D (1977) Public Transportation Fare Policy. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Transportation

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankena M (1979) Urban Transit Fare Policies. Toronto: Study on Urban Transportation Financing, University of Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaudry M (1975) An aggregate time-series model of urban transit demand: The Montreal case. Transportation Research 9: 249–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman K M & Green M A (1977) Low Fare and Fare-Free Transit: Some Recent Applications by U.S. Transit Systems. Washington, D.C.: Urban Mass Transportation Administration

    Google Scholar 

  • Grey A (1975) Urban Fare Policy. Westmead: Saxon House

    Google Scholar 

  • Hershey W, Forkenbrock D, Berla M, Miller B & Dewey M (1976) Transit Fare Prepayment. Washington, D.C.: Urban Mass Transportation Administration

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp M A (1973) Some evidence of transit demand elasticities. Transportation 2: 27–38

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1974) What are we learning from experiences with reduced transit fares? Washington, D.C.: The Urban Land Institute, working paper 5032-1-1

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirby R F (1982) Pricing strategies for public transportation. Journal of the American Planning Association 48: 327–334

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraft G & Domencich T A (1972) Free transit. In: Edel M & Rothenbergy J (Eds) Readings in Urban Economics. New York: Macmillan Company

    Google Scholar 

  • Lassow W (1968) The effect of the fare increase of July, 1966 on the number of passengers carried on the New York City transit system. Highway Research Record 475: 1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Leutze C B & Ugolik W R (1979) Who pays the highest and lowest per mile transit fares. Transportation Research Record 719: 32–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Mateyka J A (1979) Fare collection costs and innovations. Paper presented at the Forum on Transit Pricing Techniques to Improve Productivity, Urban Mass Transportation Administration, Virginia Beach, Virginia

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayworm P, Lago A & McEnroe J (1980) Patronage Impacts of Changes in Transit Fares and Services. Washington, D.C.: Urban Mass Transportation Administration

    Google Scholar 

  • McFadden D (1974) The measurement of urban travel demand. Journal of Public Economics 3: 303–328

    Google Scholar 

  • McGillivrary R G (1969) Binary choice of transport mode in the San Francisco Bay area. Berkeley: University of California, Ph.D. dissertation

    Google Scholar 

  • McLynn J M & Goodman K M (1973) Mode Choice and the Shirley Highway Experiment. Washington, D.C.: Urban Mass Transportation Administration

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Transport (1968) Transport in London. London: London Transport Review Board

    Google Scholar 

  • Moses L N & Williamson J F (1963) Value of time, mode choice and the subsidy issue in urban transportation. Journal of Political Economy 71: 247–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullen P (1975) Estimating the demand for urban bus transportation. Transportation 4: 231–251

    Google Scholar 

  • Oram R L (1983) Making transit passes viable in the 1980s. Transportation Quarterly 37: 289–296

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1988) Deep Discount Fares: Building Transit Productivity with Innovative Pricing. Washington, D.C.: Urban Mass Transportation Administration

    Google Scholar 

  • Paine F T, Nash A N, Hille S J & Brunner G A (1967) Consumer Conceived Attributes of Transportation: An Attitude Study. College Park: University of Maryland

    Google Scholar 

  • Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Company (1972) Implementation of the N-Dimensional Logit Model. San Diego: Comprehensive Planning Organization

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt R M, Pederson N J & Mather J J (1977) Traveler Response to Transportation System Changes: A Handbook for Transportation Planners. Washington, D.C.: Urban Mass Transportation Administration

    Google Scholar 

  • Rock S (1975) The redistributive effects of mass transit in the Chicago area. Evanston: Northwestern University, Ph.D. dissertation

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth G (1988) Private sector roles in urban public transport. In: Weicher J C (Ed) Private Innovations in Public Transit. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmenner R (1976) The demand for urban bus transit: A route-by-route analysis. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 10: 68–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Studenmund A H & Connor D (1982) The free-fare transit experiments. Transportation Research 16A: 261–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Talvitie A (1973) A direct demand model for downtown work trips. Transportation 2: 121–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson J M (1967) An evaluation of two proposals for traffic restraint in central London. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 130: 340–348

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickrey W (1973) Current issues in transportation. In: Chamberlain N W (Ed) Contemporary Economic Issues. Homewood, IL: Richard D. Darwin, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wabe J S & Coles O B (1975) The peak and off-peak demand for bus transport: A cross-sectional analysis of British municipal operators. Applied Economics 7: 25–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wachs M (1981) Pricing urban transportation: A critique of current policy. Journal of the American Planning Association 47: 243–251

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang G H & Skinner D (1984) The impact of fare and gasoline price changes on monthly transit ridership: Empirical evidence from seven U.S. transit authorities. Transportation Research 18B: 29–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster F V (1977) Some implications of the results of elasticity determinations. In: Factors Affecting Public Transport Patronage. Crowthorne: Transport and Road Research Laboratory, TRRL Supplementary Report 413

  • Werz J (1973) Automatic fare collection and surface transport. Paper presented at the 40th International Congress, International Union of Public Transport, Brussels, Belgium

  • Zemotel L M (1984) Duluth, Minnesota's flexible work hours/transit fare prepayment demonstration: the manager's view. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cervero, R. Transit pricing research. Transportation 17, 117–139 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02125332

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02125332

Key words

Navigation