Abstract
Several decades of research on transit pricing have provided clear insights into how riders respond to price changes in both the transit and automobile sectors. For the most part, riders are insensitive to changes in either fare levels, structures, or forms of payments, though this varies considerably among user groups and operating environments. Since riders are approximately twice as sensitive to changes in travel time as they are to changes in fares, a compelling argument can be made for operating more premium quality transit services at higher prices. Such programs could be supplemented by vouchers and concessionary programs to reduce the burden of higher fares on low-income users. Also, cross-elasticity research suggests that higher automobile prices would have a significantly greater affect on ridership than lower fares. Most research on transit fare structures shows that the common practice of flat fares is highly inequitable, penalizing short-distance and off-peak users. Free fare programs have proven quite costly for each new transit user attracted and have rarely lured motorists to transit. Free fares limited to downtowns have been more successful than systemwide free fare programs. While prepayment schemes have met with success in the U.S. and Europe, honor fares have suffered from excessive revenue losses in at least one case in the U.S. Some of the more noteworthy fare policy successes in North America have been Bridgeport's combined pass-fare program, Allentown's deep discounts, Ottawa's major fare reduction and differentiation, and Columbus's substantial midday discount. As paratransit and other new transit alternatives to conventional bus continue to emerge, new, more differentiated fare practices can be expected in the future.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abe M (1973) Pricing and welfare in urban transportation. Traffic Quarterly 27: 419–429
Altshuler A (1981) The Urban Transportation System: Politics and Policy Innovation. Cambridge: MIT Press
American Public Transit Association (1988) Transit Fact Book. Washington, D.C.: American Public Transit Association
Baum H J (1973) Free public transport. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 7: 3–19
Bonsall J A (1988) Toward a fairer and more effective fare system? The Ottawa experience of time of day service. UITP Revue 37(1): 11–39
Cervero R (1981) Flat versus differentiated transit pricing: What's a fair fare? Transportation 10: 211–232
Cervero R & Wachs M (1982) An answer to the transit crisis: The case for distance-based transit fares. Journal of Contemporary Studies 5: 59–70
Cervero R (1983a) Peak load transit pricing: Theory and practice. Journal of Advanced Transportation 3: 209–230
—— (1983b) Perceptions of who benefits from public transit. Transportation Research Record 936: 15–19
—— (1985) Examining recent transit fare innovations in the U.S. Transportation Policy and Decision Making 3: 23–41
—— (1986a) Time-of-day transit pricing: Comparative U.S. and international experiences. Transport Reviews 6: 347–364
—— (1986b) Urban transit in Canada: Integration and innovation at its best.Transportation Quarterly 40: 293–316
Collins P (1984) Fares simplication and integration in London Transport. The Sixteenth Annual Seminar on Public Transport Operations Research. The University of Leeds
Collings P H & Lindsay J F (1972) Analysis of Effect of September 1969 Fares Revision on Work Journeys. London: London Transport Executive, Operation Research Report R181
Cummings C P, Fairhurst M, LaBelle S & Stuart D (1989) Market segmentation of transit fare elasticities. Transportation Quarterly 43(3): 407–420
Curtin J (1968) Effects of fares on transit riding. Highway Research Record 213: 8–18
DeLeuw, Cather & Company (1979) Evaluation of the Denver RTD and Trenton Off-Peak Fare-Free Transit Demonstration. Cambridge, MA: U.S. Department of Transportation, Transportation Systems Center
Domencich T A, Kraft F & Valette J (1968) Estimation of urban passenger travel behavior: An economic demand model. Highway Research Record 238: 64–78
Donnelley E (1976) Preference elasticities of fare changes by demographic groups. Transportation Research Record 589: 30–32
Doxsey L B & Spear B D (1981) Systemwide Off-Peak Free-Fare Transit: A Comparison of Two Demonstrations. Cambridge: U.S. Department of Transportation, Transportation Systems Center
Dygert P, Holee J & Hill D (1977) Public Transportation Fare Policy. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Transportation
Frankena M (1979) Urban Transit Fare Policies. Toronto: Study on Urban Transportation Financing, University of Toronto
Gaudry M (1975) An aggregate time-series model of urban transit demand: The Montreal case. Transportation Research 9: 249–258
Goodman K M & Green M A (1977) Low Fare and Fare-Free Transit: Some Recent Applications by U.S. Transit Systems. Washington, D.C.: Urban Mass Transportation Administration
Grey A (1975) Urban Fare Policy. Westmead: Saxon House
Hershey W, Forkenbrock D, Berla M, Miller B & Dewey M (1976) Transit Fare Prepayment. Washington, D.C.: Urban Mass Transportation Administration
Kemp M A (1973) Some evidence of transit demand elasticities. Transportation 2: 27–38
—— (1974) What are we learning from experiences with reduced transit fares? Washington, D.C.: The Urban Land Institute, working paper 5032-1-1
Kirby R F (1982) Pricing strategies for public transportation. Journal of the American Planning Association 48: 327–334
Kraft G & Domencich T A (1972) Free transit. In: Edel M & Rothenbergy J (Eds) Readings in Urban Economics. New York: Macmillan Company
Lassow W (1968) The effect of the fare increase of July, 1966 on the number of passengers carried on the New York City transit system. Highway Research Record 475: 1–7
Leutze C B & Ugolik W R (1979) Who pays the highest and lowest per mile transit fares. Transportation Research Record 719: 32–34
Mateyka J A (1979) Fare collection costs and innovations. Paper presented at the Forum on Transit Pricing Techniques to Improve Productivity, Urban Mass Transportation Administration, Virginia Beach, Virginia
Mayworm P, Lago A & McEnroe J (1980) Patronage Impacts of Changes in Transit Fares and Services. Washington, D.C.: Urban Mass Transportation Administration
McFadden D (1974) The measurement of urban travel demand. Journal of Public Economics 3: 303–328
McGillivrary R G (1969) Binary choice of transport mode in the San Francisco Bay area. Berkeley: University of California, Ph.D. dissertation
McLynn J M & Goodman K M (1973) Mode Choice and the Shirley Highway Experiment. Washington, D.C.: Urban Mass Transportation Administration
Ministry of Transport (1968) Transport in London. London: London Transport Review Board
Moses L N & Williamson J F (1963) Value of time, mode choice and the subsidy issue in urban transportation. Journal of Political Economy 71: 247–264
Mullen P (1975) Estimating the demand for urban bus transportation. Transportation 4: 231–251
Oram R L (1983) Making transit passes viable in the 1980s. Transportation Quarterly 37: 289–296
—— (1988) Deep Discount Fares: Building Transit Productivity with Innovative Pricing. Washington, D.C.: Urban Mass Transportation Administration
Paine F T, Nash A N, Hille S J & Brunner G A (1967) Consumer Conceived Attributes of Transportation: An Attitude Study. College Park: University of Maryland
Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Company (1972) Implementation of the N-Dimensional Logit Model. San Diego: Comprehensive Planning Organization
Pratt R M, Pederson N J & Mather J J (1977) Traveler Response to Transportation System Changes: A Handbook for Transportation Planners. Washington, D.C.: Urban Mass Transportation Administration
Rock S (1975) The redistributive effects of mass transit in the Chicago area. Evanston: Northwestern University, Ph.D. dissertation
Roth G (1988) Private sector roles in urban public transport. In: Weicher J C (Ed) Private Innovations in Public Transit. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research
Schmenner R (1976) The demand for urban bus transit: A route-by-route analysis. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 10: 68–86
Studenmund A H & Connor D (1982) The free-fare transit experiments. Transportation Research 16A: 261–269
Talvitie A (1973) A direct demand model for downtown work trips. Transportation 2: 121–152
Thomson J M (1967) An evaluation of two proposals for traffic restraint in central London. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 130: 340–348
Vickrey W (1973) Current issues in transportation. In: Chamberlain N W (Ed) Contemporary Economic Issues. Homewood, IL: Richard D. Darwin, Inc.
Wabe J S & Coles O B (1975) The peak and off-peak demand for bus transport: A cross-sectional analysis of British municipal operators. Applied Economics 7: 25–30.
Wachs M (1981) Pricing urban transportation: A critique of current policy. Journal of the American Planning Association 47: 243–251
Wang G H & Skinner D (1984) The impact of fare and gasoline price changes on monthly transit ridership: Empirical evidence from seven U.S. transit authorities. Transportation Research 18B: 29–41
Webster F V (1977) Some implications of the results of elasticity determinations. In: Factors Affecting Public Transport Patronage. Crowthorne: Transport and Road Research Laboratory, TRRL Supplementary Report 413
Werz J (1973) Automatic fare collection and surface transport. Paper presented at the 40th International Congress, International Union of Public Transport, Brussels, Belgium
Zemotel L M (1984) Duluth, Minnesota's flexible work hours/transit fare prepayment demonstration: the manager's view. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cervero, R. Transit pricing research. Transportation 17, 117–139 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02125332
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02125332