Abstract
Conflict is a common feature of mental health delivery systems. However, there are many types of conflict and each requires specification and careful measurement. The authors present a study of mental health delivery systems in eight Oregon counties and the results of five conflict parameters that measured conflict with seriously mentally ill clients, family members, the state mental health division, county agencies, and professional/advocate agencies. Implications of the findings for countywide service systems are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bachrach, L.L. (1981). Continuity of care for chronic mental patients: A conceptual analysis.American Journal of Psychiatry, 138, 1449–1456.
Baker, F., & O'Brien, G. (1971). Intersystem relations and coordination of human service organizations.American Journal of Public Health, 61, 130–137.
Connery, R.H. (1968).The politics of mental health. New York: Columbia University Press.
Coser, L. (1955).The function of social conflict. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.
Fiorentine, R., & Grusky, O. (1990). When case managers manage the mentally ill: A role contingency approach.Social Service Review, 79–93.
Goodman, P.S., Pennings, J.M. (Eds.). (1977).New perspectives on organizational effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Grusky, O., & Tierney, K. (1989). Evaluating the effectiveness of countywide mental health delivery systems.Community Mental Health Journal, 25, 3–20.
Grusky, O., Tierney, K., Holstein, J., Anspach, R., Davis, D., Unruh, D., Webster, S., Vandewater, S., & Allen, H. (1986). Models of local mental health delivery systems. In W.R. Scott & B.L. Black (Eds.),The organization of mental health services: Society and community systems. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
Hannan, M.T., & Freeman, J. (1977). Obstacles to comparative studies. In P.S. Goodman, J.M. Pennings (Eds.).,New perspectives on organizational effectiveness (pp. 106–131). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Hasenfeld, Y. (1983).Human service organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Katz, D., & Kahn, R.L. (1966).The social psychology of organizations. New York: Wiley.
March, J.G., & Simon, H.A. (1958).Organizations. New York: Wiley.
Mulford, C.L. (1984).Interorganizational relations: Implications for community development. New York: Human Sciences Press.
Pfeffer, J. (1977). The usefulness of the concept. In P.S. Goodman, J.M. Pennings (Eds.),New perspectives on organizational effectiveness (pp. 132–145). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Rogers, D.L., & Whetten, D.A. (1982).Interorganizational coordination: Theory, research, and implementation. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.
Scott, W.R. (1981).Organizations: Rational, natural, and open system models. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Scott, R., & Black, B.L. (1986).The organization of mental health services: Society and community systems. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
Weiss, C.H. (1983). The stakeholder approach to evaluation: Origin and promise in stakeholder-based education. In A.S. Bryk (Ed.),New directions for program evaluation (No. 17). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by the National Institute of Mental Health, MH-14583, Oscar Grusky, Program Director, and ROI MH-38887, Oscar Grusky, principal investigator. A revised version of this paper was presented at the XXXth International Congress of the International Institute of Sociology, Kobe, Japan, in 1991. An earlier version of this paper was also presented to Prof. Steven Segal's NIMH-supported training program at University of California, Berkeley. We are grateful for that group's suggestions and especially grateful to Lance Egley who prompted us to change one of our instruments and also offered other valuable comments.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Grusky, O., Adams, R. Organizational conflict and mental health service system effectiveness. Adm Policy Ment Health 22, 145–157 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02106548
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02106548