Skip to main content
Log in

Metabolic studies on scorbutic guinea pigs

IV. Fatty acid metabolism in vitro

  • Originalarbeiten
  • Published:
Zeitschrift für Ernährungswissenschaft Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

  1. 1.

    The tissue weight and fatty acid concentration were observed to be higher in the case of scorbutic guinea pigs compared to the pair-fed control animals. Amongst the tissues analysed, maximum increase in fatty acid level was found with the liver tissue.

  2. 2.

    Fatty acid synthesis by the scorbutic tissuein vitro was diminished. Both tissue homogenates and slices had less capacity to convert acetate-1-14C to labeled fatty acids. The specific activities of the synthesised fatty acids by tissues of scorbutic guinea pigs were appreciably less than that synthesised by the corresponding tissue preparations from the pairfed animals. Incorporation by tissue from normal animal fed ‘ad libitum’ was more compared to the tissue from pair-fed one.

  3. 3.

    Hepatic oxidation of acetate-1-14C to14CO2 by slices was depressed in scurvy.

  4. 4.

    Mitochondria prepared from scorbutic liver tissue exhibited a lower oxidation of octanoate-1-14C to14CO2. Addition of essential cofactors like ATP and Mg++ in the system did not improve the depressed oxidation.

  5. 5.

    Thein vitro oxidation of terminally labeled higher fatty acids like lauric, myristic and stearic to 14CO2 by the mitochondrial tissue preparation from scorbutic guinea pigs was appreciably depressed as a result of this disease. ATP and Mg++ could fortify considerably this defect.

  6. 6.

    The significance of these findings in relation to lipid metabolism in scurvy is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Quastel, J. H. andA. H. M. Wheatley, Biochem. J.28, 1014 (1934).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Abramson, H., J. Biol. Chem.178, 179 (1949).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Donnan, S. K., J. Biol. Chem.182, 415 (1950).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ottonlenghi, A., F. Bernheim, andK. M. Wilbur, Arch. Biochem. Biophys.56, 157 (1955).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Debous, A. F., J. W. Wallace, andH. Bacchus, Am. J. Physiol,185, 31 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Becker, A. R., H. B. Burch, L. L. Salomon, T. T. Venkitasubra-manium, andC. G. King, J. Am. Chem. Coc.75, 2020 (1953).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Banerjee, S. andH. D. Singh, J. Biol. Chem.233, 336 (1958).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Guchhait, R. andN. C. Ganguli, Bull. Natl. Inst. Sciences (India), No.18, 49 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Guchhait, R., B. C. Guha, andN. C. Ganguli, Biochem. J.86, 193 (1963).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Guchhait, R., Dissertation, Calcutta University (1961).

  11. Sheppard, M. andE. W. Mchenry, Biochem. J.33, 655 (1939).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sigal, A. andC. G. King, J. Biol. Chem.116, 489 (1936).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Banerjee, S., D. K. Biswas, andH. D. Singh, J. Biol. Chem.230, 261 (1958).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ganguli, N. C. andB. A. Banerjee, J. Biol. Chem.236, 979 (1961).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Banerjee, A. B. andN. C. Ganguli, J. Biol. Chem.,237, 14 (1962).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Banerjee, S., J. Biol. Chem.159, 327 (1945).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hogeboom, G. H., inS. P. Colowick andN. O. Kaplan (Editors), Methods in enzymology, Vol. I, Academic Press, Inc., New York, 1955, p. 16.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Guchhait, R. andN. C. Ganguli, J. Sci. Ind. Res.200, 195 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Guchhait, R. andN. C. Ganguli Biochim. Biophys. Acta,51, 607 (1961).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Katz, J. andI. L. Chaikoff, J. Biol. Chem.206, 887 (1954).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ma, T. S. andG. Zuazaga, Ind. Eng. Chem. (Anal. Ed.),14, 280 (1942).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Lehninger, A. L., inS. P. Colowick andN. O. Kaplan (Editors), Methods in enzymology, Vol. I, Academic Press, Inc., New York, 1955, p. 545.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Emerson, R. J. andJ. T. Van Bruggen, Arch. Biochem. Biophys.77, 467 (1958).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Lyon, I., M. S. Masri, andI. L. Chaikoff, J. Biol. Chem.196, 25 (1952).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Hutchens, T. T., J. T. Van Bruggen, R. M. Cockburn, andE. S. West, J. Biol. Chem.208, 115 (1954).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Ganguli, N. C. andS. C. Roy, Ann. Biochem. and Exptl. Med.14, 35 (1954).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Takeda, Y. andM. Hara, J. Biol. Chem.214, 657 (1955).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Banerjee, S., D. K. Biswas, andH. D. Singh, J. Biol. Chem.235, 902 (1960).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Brady, R. O. andGurin, S., J. Biol. Chem.186, 461 (1950).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Brady, R. O., F. D. W. Lukens, andS. Gurin, J. Biol. Chem.193, 45 (1951).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Banerjee, S., Nature (London),153, 344 (1944).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Deceased March 20, 1962.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Guchhait, R., Guha, B.C. & Ganguli, N.C. Metabolic studies on scorbutic guinea pigs. Z Ernährungswiss 5, 21–30 (1964). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02019417

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02019417

Navigation