Skip to main content
Log in

Fundamentals and devaluation expectations in target zones: Some new evidence from the ERM

  • Published:
Open Economies Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The credibility of exchange rate target zones for four EMS countries for the period March 1979-September 1992 is examined. Existing methods by Svensson, Edin and Vredin, typically applied to data from the Nordic countries, are considered. On balance, the method suggested by Edin and Vredin provides somewhat better estimates of devaluation probabilities than either of Svensson's methods. While all methods produce reasonably good estimates of the expected size of devaluations, they did not predict the September 1992 EMS crisis. However, we find that electoral and other institutional variables improve estimates of devaluation expectations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alesina, A. (1988) “Macroeconomics and Politics”. In S. Fischer (ed)NBER Macroeconomics Annual. Cambridge: MIT Press, p. 13–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartolini, L. and G. Bodnar (1992) “Target Zones and Forward Rates in a Model with Repeated Realignments,”International Monetary Fund Working Paper 92/22.

  • Branson, W.H. (1994) “Comments on Rose and Svensson”,European Economic Review 38, 1217–1220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burdekin, R.C.K. (1993) “Inflation, Output and Wages in Europe, 1971–1989: Did Membership in the European Monetary System Matter?” manuscript, Claremont Graduate School.

  • Burdekin, R.C.K., J. Westbrook and T.D. Willett (1994) “Exchange Rate Pegging as a Disinflation Strategy: Evidence from the EMS”. In P.L. Siklos (ed)Varieties of Monetary Reforms: Lessons and Experiences on the Road to Monetary Union. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 45–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caramazza, F. (1993) “French-German Interest Rate Differentials and Time-Varying Realignment Risk”,IMF Staff Papers 40, 567–583.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Z. and A. Giovannini (1993) “The Determinants of Realignment Expectations under the EMS: Some Empirical Results”NBER Working Paper No. 4291.

  • Dumas, B. and L.E.O. Svensson (1994) “How Long Do Unilateral Target Zones Last”DELTA Working Paper 94-06.

  • Edin, P.A. and A. Vredin (1993) “Devaluation Risk in Target Zones: Evidence from the Nordic Countries”Economic Journal 103, 161–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichengreen, B. and C. Wyplosz (1993) “The Ustable EMS,”Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1, 51–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, R.P., A.K. Rose, and D.J. Mathieson (1993) “An Empirical Exploration of Exchange Rate Target Zones,”Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 35, 7–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, E.H. and W.R.M. Perraudin (1993) “Asymmetry in the ERM”,IMF Staff Papers 40, 427–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gärtner, M. (1993)Macroeconomics under Flexible Exchange Rates. New York: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabbe, J.O. (1991)International Financial Markets, second edition. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, W.H. (1993)Econometric Analysis, second edition, New York: MacMillan Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, J.J. (1979) “Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error”,Econometrica 47, 153–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaminsky, G. and R. Peruga (1990) “Can a Time Varying Premium Explain Excess Returns in the Forward Market for Foreign Exchange?”Journal of International Economics 28, 47–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P. (1991) “Target Zones and Exchange Rate Dynamics”Quarterly Journal of Economics 106, 669–682.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P. and M.H. Miller (1991) “Why Have a Target Zone?”Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy.

  • Krugman, P. and J. Rotemberg (1990) “Target Zones with Limited Reserves”.NBER Working Paper No. 3418.

  • Lindberg, H., P. Soderlind, and L.E.O. Svensson (1993) “Devaluation Expectations: The Swedish Krona 1985–1992”,Economic Journal 103, 1170–1179.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCallum, B.T. (1994) “A Reconsideration of the Uncovered Interest Rate Parity Relationship”,Journal of Monetarv Economics 33, 105–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mindford, P. (1993) “The Political Economy of the Exchange Rate Mechanism,”CEPR Working Paper No. 774.

  • Molle, W. (1990)The Economics of European Integration. Aldershot: Dartmouth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neely, C.J. (1994) “Redevelopment of Target Zone Exchange Rate Systems: What Do We Know?”Review of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 76, 23–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, A.K. and L.E.O. Svennson (1991) “Expected and Predicted Realignments: The FF/DM Exchange Rate During the EMS,”Institute for International Economic Studies Seminar Paper 485.

  • Rose, A.K., and L.E.O. Svensson (1994) “European Exchange Rate Credibility After the Fall”European Economic Review 8, 1185–1216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, L.E.O. (1994) “Fixed Exchange Rates as a Means to Price Stability: What Have Learned?”NBER Working Paper No. 4504.

  • Svensson, L.E.O. (1993) “Assessing Target Zone Credibility: Mean Reversion and Devalaution Expectations in the EMS 1973–1992,”European Economic Review 37, 763–793.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, L.E.O. (1992a) “An Interpretation of Resent Research on Exchange Rate Target Zones,”Journal of Economic Perspectives 6, 119–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, L.E.O. (1992b) “The Foreign Exchange Risk Premium in Target Zone with Devaluation Risk”,Journal of International Economics 33, 21–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, L.E.O. (1992c) “Why Exchange Rate Bands? Monetary Independence in Spite of Fixed Exchange Rates”,NBER Working Paper No. 4207.

  • Svensson, L.E.O. (1991b) “The Simplest Test of Target Zone Credibility”,IMF Staff Papers, 38, 655–665.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, L.E.O. (1991b) “The Tetm Sttucture of Interest Rates in a Target Zone: Theory and Evidence,”Journal of Monetary Economics 28, 87–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabellini, G. (1994) “Comments on Rose and Svensson (1994),”European Economic Review 38, 1221–1223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M.P. (1995) “The Economics of Exchange Rates,”Journal of Economic Literature 33, 13–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, K.J. (1993)Shazam: Econometric Computer Program, version 7.0, User's Reference Manual. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Siklos, P.L., Tarajos, R. Fundamentals and devaluation expectations in target zones: Some new evidence from the ERM. Open Econ Rev 7, 35–59 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01886128

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01886128

Key words

JEL classification