Summary
This paper presents data on personal income distribution in the Netherlands for the period 1914–1972, in terms of decile income shares and measures of dispersion. Estimates are given of the trend and of cyclical sensitivity of income inequality, both trend and cycle being far more important before 1940 than after. Attempts to explain changes in inequality by regression analysis, with a necessarily limited set of variables, lead to many rejections.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beach, C. M., ‘Cyclical Sensitivity of Aggregate Income Inequality,’ Review of Economics and Statistics, LIX (1977), pp. 56–66.
Cate, A. ten and W. J. Keller,Een efficiënte methode voor het vinden van een minimum van een functie van meerdere variabelen: een computer programma, Discussion Paper 7702/P, Institute for Fiscal Studies, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, 1977.
Centraal Planbureau,De personele inkomensverdeling 1952–1967, Monografie 19, Den Haag, 1975.
Champernowne, D. G., ‘A Comparison of Measures of Inequality of Income Distribution,’Economic Journal, LXXXIV (1974), pp. 787–816.
Cline, W. R., ‘Distribution and Development. A Survey of Literature,’ Journal of Development Economics, 1 (1975), pp. 359–400.
Douben, N. H.,Her herverdeelde inkomen, Deventer, 1970.
Kooijman, M. A.,Dummy Variables in Econometrics, Tilburg, 1976.
Mustert, G. M., ‘Meten met mate(n),’Economisch-Statistische Berichten, LXII (1977), pp. 331–33.
Pen J. and J. Tinbergen, ‘Hoeveel bedraagt de inkomensegalisatie sinds 1938’?Economisch-Statistische Berichten, LXI (1976), pp, 880–84.
Schultz, T. P., ‘Secular Equalization and Cyclical Behavior of Income Distribution,’Review of Economics and Statistics, L (1968), pp. 259–267.
Tinbergen, J.,Income Distribution, Amsterdam, 1975.
Williamson, J. G., ‘The Sources of American Inequality 1896–1948,’Review of Economics and Statistics, LVIII (1976), pp. 387–397.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hartog, J., Veenbergen, J.G. Dutch treat. De Economist 126, 521–549 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01849813
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01849813