Summary
We compare the non-Nash points set and the non semianalytic points set of a closed subanalytic set; in particular, we point out some situations in which the two sets are the same. We give some results on the structure of these sets.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Références
E. Bierstone -P. D. Milman,Composite differentiable functions, Ann. of Math.,116 (1982), pp. 541–558.
E.Bierstone - P. D.Milman,Relations between analytic junctions, (à paraître).
E. Bierstone -G. W. Schwarz,Continuous linear division and extension of C ∞ functions, Duke Math. J.,50 (1983), pp. 233–271.
E.Fortuna - M.Galbiati,Quelques résultats sur les ensembles Nash sous-analytiques (à paraître sur le Bulletin de la Société Mathématique de France).
H.Hironaka,Subanalytic sets, Number Theory, Algebraic Geometry and Commutative Algebra, Kinokunya, Tokyo, (1973), pp. 453–493.
D. T.Lê - B.Teissier,Report on the problem session. Singularities, Proc. of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, Vol. 40, Part 2.
M. Tamm,Subanalytic sets in the calculus of variations, Acta Math.,146 (1981), pp. 167–199.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Les auteurs sont associés au G.N.S.A.G.A. du C.N.R.: Recherche partiellement financiée par le M.P.I.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fortuna, E., Galbiati, M. Semi-analyticité et sous-analyticité. Annali di Matematica pura ed applicata 143, 363–372 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01769224
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01769224