Abstract
A case study analyzed employees' attitudes toward, and experiences with, an intraorganizational electronic mail system. Results revealed that females perceived e-mail to be easier to use, more efficient, and more effective than males. They also gave higher ratings of appropriateness for using e-mail to transmit certain types of messages. Females (particularly managers) were more likely than their male counterparts to rely on co-workers to learn how to use e-mail. More females used the computer system for word processing, while more males and whites (who comprised 82.2% of the sample) had off-site connections to the computer system. No other distinctions were found regarding race—ethnicity. Implications for future research are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Allen, B. J. (1989).Computer-mediated communication: Factors associated with using an intraorganizational electronic mail system. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Howard University, Washington, DC.
Badagliacco, J. M. (1990). Gender and race differences in computing attitudes and experience.Social Science Computer Review, 8, 43–63.
Banks, M. E., & Ackerman, R. J. (1991). Ethnic and gender computer employment status.Computers in Human Behavior, 7, 75–82.
Becker, H. J. (1985). Men and women as computer-using teachers.Sex Roles, 13, 137–148.
Cardman, E. R. (1990). The gender gap in computer use: Implications for bibliographic instruction.Research Strategies, 8, 116–128.
Gutek, B. A., & Bikson, T. K. (1985). Differential experiences of men and women in computerized offices.Sex Roles, 13, 123–136.
Hawkins, J. (1985). Computers and girls: Rethinking the issues.Sex Roles, 13, 165–180.
Herschel, R. T. (1994). The impact of varying gender composition on group brainstorming performance in a GSS environment.Computers in Human Behavior, 209–224.
Hiltz, S. R., & Johnson, K. (1990). User satisfaction with computer-mediated communication systems.Management Science, 36, 739–751.
Horvath, A. T., & Fulk, J. (1994). Information technology and the prospects for organizational transformation. In B. Kovacic (Ed.),New approaches to organizational communication. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Kay, R. H. (1992). Understanding gender differences in computer attitudes, aptitude and use: An invitation to build theory.Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 25, 159–171.
Krendl, K. A., & Broihier, M. (1992). Student responses to computers: A longitudinal study.Journal of Educational Computing Research, 8, 215–227.
Lockheed, M. E. (1985). Women, girls and computers: A first look at the evidence.Sex Roles, 13, 115–122.
Matheson, K., & Zanna, M. P. (1990). Computer-mediated communications: The focus is on me.Social Science Computer Review, 8, 1–12.
Ogletree, S. M., & Williams, S. W. (1990). Sex and sex-typing effects on computer attitudes and aptitude.Sex Roles, 25, 703–712.
Parasuraman, S., & Igbaria, M. (1990). An examination of gender differences in the determinants of computer anxiety and attitudes toward microcomputers among managers.International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 32, 327–340.
Rakow, L. F. (1988). Gendered technology, gendered practice.Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 5, 57–70.
Rice, R. E., & Shook, D. E. (1990). Relationships of job categories and organizational levels to use of communication channels, including electronic mail: A meta-analysis and extension.The Journal of Management Studies, 27, 195–207.
Rice, R. E., Chang, S., & Torobin, J. (1992). Communicator style, media use, organizational level, and use and evaluation of electronic messaging.Management Communication Quarterly, 6, 3–13.
Shashaani, L. (1993). Gender-based differences in attitudes toward computers.Computers and Education, 20, 169–181.
Steinfield, C. (1992). Computer-mediated communications in organizational settings: Emerging conceptual frameworks and directions for research.Management Communication Quarterly, 5, 348–365.
Turkle, S. (1984).The second self. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Vernon-Gerstenfeld, S. (1985). Serendipity? Are there gender differences in the adoption of computers? A case study.Sex Roles, 13, 161–173.
Wilder, G., Mackie, D., & Cooper, J. (1985). Gender and computers: Two surveys of computer-related attitudes.Sex Roles, 13, 215–228.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The author is grateful to Karen Tracy, Robert Craig, and anonymous reviewers for their insights and suggestions.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Allen, B.J. Gender and computer-mediated communication. Sex Roles 32, 557–563 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01544189
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01544189