Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Research and scholarship: Perceptions of senior academic administrators

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper reports selected findings from the first stage of a study on the research role within academic work in Australian universities. These findings come from the interview component of the study and discuss the perceptions that senior academic administrators hold on ‘research’ and ‘scholarship’. The analysis of the interviews indicates that ‘research’ covers a wide and varied range of activities across the disciplines found in a university and therefore needs to be defined broadly. However, ‘research’ has three major attributes: new knowledge, enquiry and publication of results and views. ‘Scholarship’ was perceived to be part of the research process, providing the context for good research by adding the element of breadth to the depth of ‘research’. In addition, ‘scholarship’ describes the manner of pursuing a serious, sustained line of enquiry as well as the dissemination process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Becher, T. (1981). ‘Towards a definition of disciplinary cultures’,Studies in Higher Education 6 (2), 109–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becher, T. (1987a). Disciplinary discourse.Studies in Higher Education 12 (3), 261–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becher, T. (1987b). ‘The Disciplinary Shaping of the Profession’, in Clark, B.R. (ed.),The Academic Profession. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 271–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becher, T. (1989).Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Cultures of Disciplines. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biglan, A. (1973a). ‘The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas’,Journal of Applied Psychology 57 (3), 195–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biglan, A. (1973b). ‘Relationships between subject matter characteristics and the structure and output of university departments’,Journal of Applied Psychology 57 (3), 204–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, H.R. (1977).Investment in Learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, H.R. and Schuster, J.H. (1986).American Professors: A National Resource Imperiled. Oxford University Press.

  • Carter, C. (1980).Higher Education for the Future. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B.R. (1983).The Higher Education System: Academic Organization in Cross-National Perspective. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cyert, R.M. and Knapp, P.A. (1984). ‘Research in the humanities’,Liberal Education 70 (2), 95–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, J.S. (1988).Higher Education: A Policy Statement (White Paper) Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elton, L. (1986). ‘Research and teaching: symbiosis or conflict.Higher Education 15, 299–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay, A. (1989). ‘The teaching and research roles of academics — conflicting pressures in the higher education system’,Herdsa News, 11 (3), 5–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay, A.W. and Neumann, R.T. (1988).The Challenge for Research in Higher Education: Harmonizing Excellence and Utility. Washington: ASHE-ERIC.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, E.J. (1962). ‘Characteristics of outstanding college teachers’,Journal of Higher Education 33, 148–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, R. (1992). ‘Perceptions of the teaching-research nexus: a framework for analysis’,Higher Education 23 (2), 159–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, R. (1990a). Interview-Based Research Into Academic Work, in Macpherson, R.J.S. and Weeks, J. (eds),Pathways to Knowledge In Educational Administration: Methodologies and Research in Progress in Australia. Armidale: ACEA, pp. 95–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, R. (1990b).A Study of the Research Role Within Academic Work. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, School of Education, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, R. and Lindsay, A. (1988). ‘Research policy and the changing nature of Australia's universities’,Higher Education 17 (3), 307–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (1981).The Future of University Research. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartzman, S. (1984). The Focus on Scientific Activity, in Clark, B.R. (ed.),Perspectives on Higher Education: Eight Disciplinary and Comparative Views. Berkley: University of California Press, pp. 199–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, P. (1991), ‘Beyond the dual-support system: scholarship, research and teaching in the context of academic autonomy’,Studies in Higher Education 16 (1), 5–13.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Higher Education and Professional Development, Macquarie University, 2109, Sydney, NSW, Australia

    Ruth Neumann

Authors
  1. Ruth Neumann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Neumann, R. Research and scholarship: Perceptions of senior academic administrators. High Educ 25, 97–110 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01384743

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01384743

Keywords