Skip to main content
Log in

Susceptibility of chicken blood lymphoblasts and monocytes to infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV)

  • Brief Report
  • Published:
Archives of Virology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

PHA-M stimulated lymphoblasts obtained from peripheral blood and separated from small lymphocytes by ×1g velocity sedimentation, unstimulated blood lymphocytes, monocytes and cells isolated from the bursa of Fabricius of chickens, were infected in vitro by the pathogenic strain CU-1 of infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV). Six hours after infection 32.5 per cent of the bursal cells reacted immunocytologically with IBDV antiserum and had high infectivity titers in plaque assays. Separated lymphoblasts showed a marked lower degree of virus replication and only 2.5 per cent reacted positively when studied by immunocytology, while monocytes ranged between these two cell types with regard to both the degree of virus replication and the positive reaction with IBDV antiserum. Small lymphocytes, however, were found to be totally resistant to IBDV infection. When studied by electron microscopy, virus particles arranged in a crystalloid pattern could only be detected in bursal cells. The results of this study indicate that proliferating lymphoid cells at a certain stage of cellular differentiation are the target cells for IBDV, and that in infected chickens monocytes may play a role in the spreading of the virus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Beug H, Müller H, Grieser S, Doederlein G, Graf T (1981) Hematopoietic cells transformed in vitro by REVT avian reticuloendotheliosis virus express characteristics of very immature lymphoid cells. Virology 115: 295–309

    Google Scholar 

  2. Burkhardt E (1979) Scanning electron microscopy of peripheral blood leukocytes of the chicken. Cell Tissue Res 204: 147–153

    Google Scholar 

  3. Burkhardt E (1980) Scanning and transmission electron microscopy of glass bead column-separated monocytes from mononuclear leukocyte suspensions of peripheral blood of the chicken. J Reticuloendothel Soc 28: 103–109

    Google Scholar 

  4. Burkhardt E (1984) A rapid method for processing large numbers of cell suspension samples for cytochemical and immunocytochemical electron microscopy. Histochemical J 16: 1339–1342

    Google Scholar 

  5. Domingo M, Reinacher M, Burkhardt E, Weiss E (1986) Monoclonal antibodies directed towards the two major cell populations in the bursa of Fabricius of of the chicken. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 11: 305–317

    Google Scholar 

  6. Käufer I, Weiss E (1976) Electron-microscope studies on the pathogenesis of infectious bursal disease after intrabursal application of the causal virus. Avian Dis 20: 483–495

    Google Scholar 

  7. Käufer I, Weiss E (1979) Significance of bursa of Fabricius as target organ in infectious bursal disease of chickens. Infect Immun 27: 364–367

    Google Scholar 

  8. Miller RG (1976) Separation of cells by velocity sedimentation. In: Bloom BR, David JR (eds) In vitro methods in cell-mediated and tumor immunity. Academic Press, New York, pp 283–307

    Google Scholar 

  9. Müller H (1986) Replication of infectious bursal disease virus in lymphoid cells. Arch Virol 87: 191–203

    Google Scholar 

  10. Müller H, Becht H (1982) Biosynthesis of virus-specific proteins in cells infected with infectious bursal disease virus and their significance as structural elements for infectious virus and incomplete particles. J Virol 44: 384–392

    Google Scholar 

  11. Müller R, Käufer I, Reinacher M, Weiss E (1979) Immunofluorescent studies of early virus propagation after oral infection with infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV). Zentrabl Veterinarmed [B] 26: 345–352

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nick H, Cursiefen D, Becht H (1976) Structural and growth characteristics of infectious bursal disease virus. J Virol 18: 227–234

    Google Scholar 

  13. Thiel H-J, Burkhardt E (1984) Development of optimal conditions for the stimulation of chicken peripheral blood lymphocytes by phytohaemagglutinin (PHA) in the microculture system. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 6: 287–340

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

With 2 Figures

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Burkhardt, E., Müller, H. Susceptibility of chicken blood lymphoblasts and monocytes to infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV). Archives of Virology 94, 297–303 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01310722

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01310722

Keywords

Navigation