Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Performability-based fleet sizing in a material handling system

  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This research examines the problem of determining the optimal fleet size for fixed-path material handling systems on the bases of performance and reliability, simultaneously. In this paper, a regression model is developed to study the relationships among various material handling system design characteristics (fleet size, guide path layout, and number of P/D stations, vehicle speed and failure rates, guide path intersection failure rates, and P/D station failure rates) and performability, measured as the average number of material moves between failures (MBF). The regression model highlights the important relationships between the selected factors and performability, and may be used to determine the performability-based optima for the controllable design characteristics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gunter P. Sharp and Fuh-Hwa Franklin Liu, “An analytical method for configuring fixed-path, closed-loop material handling systems”, International Journal of Production Research, 28(4), pp. 757–783, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Andy Neely, Mike Gregory and Ken Platts, “Performance measurement system design: a literature review and research agenda”, International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 15(4), pp. 80–116, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  3. David J. Smith, Reliability, Maintainability, and Risk, Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dave Newton, “Simulation model calculates how many automated guided vehicles are needed”, Industrial Engineering, pp. 68–78, February 1985.

  5. Mufit Ozden, “A simulation study of multiple-load-carrying automated guided vehicles in a flexible manufacturing system”, International Journal of Production Research, 26(8), pp. 1353–1366, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Vlatko Ceric, “Simulation study of an automated guided-vehicle system in a Yugoslav hospital”, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 41(4), pp. 299–310, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  7. W. L. Maxwell and J. A. Muckstadt, “Design of automatic guided vehicle systems”, IIE Transactions, 14(2), pp. 114–124, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kevin R. Fitzgerald, “How to estimate the number of AGVs you need”, Modern Materials Handling, p. 79, October 1985.

  9. Pius J. Egbelu, “The use of non-simulation approaches in estimating vehicle requirements in an automated guided vehicle based transport system”, Material Flow, 4. pp. 17–32, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  10. B. Mahadevan and T. T. Narendran, “Design of an automated guided vehicle-based material handling system for a flexible manufacturing system”, International Journal of Production Research, 28(9), pp. 1611–1622, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  11. B. Mahadevan and T. T. Narendran, “Estimation of number of AGVs for an FMS: an analytical model”, International Journal of Production Research, 31(7), pp. 1655–1670, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  12. D. Sinreich and J. M. A. Tanchoco, “An economic model for determining AGV fleet size”, International Journal of Production Research, 30(6), pp. 1255–1268, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. G. Kasilingam, “Mathematical modeling of the AGVs capacity requirements planning problem”, Engineering Cost and Production Economics, 21, pp. 171–175, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lei Lei, Ronald Armstrong and Shanhong Gu, “Minimizing the fleet size with dependent time-window and single-track constraints”, Operations Research Letters, 14, pp. 91–98, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  15. M. Eric Johnson and Margaret L. Brandeau, “An analytic model for design of a multivehicle automated guided vehicle system”, Management Science, 39(12), pp. 1477–1489, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Yafeng Du and Randolph Hall, “Fleet sizing and empty equipment redistribution for center-terminal transportation networks”, Management Science, 43(2), pp. 145–157, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  17. J. M. A. Tanchoco, P. J. Egbelu and Fataneh Taghaboni, “Determination of the total number of vehicles in an AGV-based material transport system”, Material Flow, 4, pp. 33–51, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  18. R. A. Wysk, Pius J. Egbelu, Chen Zhou and B. K. Ghosh, “Use of spread sheet analysis for evaluating AGV systems”, Material Flow, 4, pp. 53–64, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pius J. Egbelu, “Concurrent specification of unit load sizes and automated guided vehicle fleet size in manufacturing system”, International Journal of Production Economics, 29(1), pp. 49–64, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  20. K. Ravi Raju and O. V. Krishnaiah Chetty, “Design and evaluation of automated guided vehicle systems for flexible manufacturing systems: an extended timed Petri net-based approach”, International Journal of Production Research, 31(5), pp. 1069–1096, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  21. B. Mahadevan and T. T. Narendran, “A hybrid modelling approach to the design of an AGV-based material handling system for an FMS”, International Journal of Production Research, 32(9), pp. 2015–2030, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  22. R. G. Kasilingam and S. L. Gobal, “Vehicle requirements model for automated guided vehicle systems”, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 12, pp. 276–279, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  23. G. E. P. Box and D. W. Behnken, “Some new three-level designs for the study of quantitative variables”, Technometrics, 2, pp. 455–476, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  24. G. E. P. Box and N. R. Draper, Empirical Model Building and Response Surfaces, Wiley, New York, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical, Industrial, and Nuclear Engineering, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH

    Benita M. Beamon

  2. School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA

    Victoria C. P. Chen

Authors
  1. Benita M. Beamon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Victoria C. P. Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Beamon, B.M., Chen, V.C.P. Performability-based fleet sizing in a material handling system. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 14, 441–449 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01304623

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01304623

Keywords

Search

Navigation