Skip to main content
Log in

Optimal grazing of wapiti (Cervus elaphus) on grassland: Patch and feeding station departure rules

  • Published:
Evolutionary Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

We studied factors which may shape giving-up decisions of wapiti grazing grassland patches (area where a wapiti initiates and terminates a feeding sequence) and feeding stations (area within a patch that a wapiti can reach without moving its forelegs). In grassland patches, cropping rate decreased after a critical period, whereas at feeding stations cropping rate increased with cumulative bites consumed. The number of feeding stations grazed, number of bites taken and grazing time did not dictate the termination of grazing in a patch. Wapiti gave up a patch only after the cropping rate at a feeding station dropped below the seasonal expectation during trials on lush pasture in May, but gave up after the cropping rate dropped below the seasonal expectation at two consecutive feeding stations in March/April and August when foraging conditions were less favourable. This confirmed a prediction of the marginal value theorem. Wapiti did not give up a feeding station according to bites taken, grazing time or cropping rate, but they left feeding stations when their lateral neck angle reached a critical point suggesting a biokinetic explanation. Leaving feeding stations when ungrazed forage can no longer be reached and patches when intake rate drops both appeared to be rules used by wapiti grazing grasslands of the boreal mixed wood forest.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Association of Official Analytical Chemists, AOAC (1984)Official Methods of Analysis, 14th edition, pp. 957. Association of Official Agricultural chemists, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnov, E. L. (1976) Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem.Theor. Pop. Biol. 9, 129–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowie, R. J. (1977) Optimal foraging of Great Tit (Parus major).Nature (London) 268, 137–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gates, C. C. and Hudson, R. J. (1983) Foraging behavior of wapiti in a boreal forest enclosure.Nat. Can. 110, 197–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goering, H. K. and van Soest, P. J. (1970) Forage Fiber Analyses (Apparatus, Reagents, Procedures and Some Applications). United States Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Handbook No. 379.

  • Holling, C. S. (1959) Some characteristics of simple types of predation and parasitism.Can. Entomol. 7, 385–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodges, C. M. (1981) Optimal foraging in bumblebees: hunting by expectation.Anim. Behav. 29, 1166–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iwasa, Y., Higashi, M. and Yamamura, Y. (1981) Prey distribution as a factor determining the choice of optimal foraging strategy.Am. Nat. 117, 710–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, Z. and Hudson, R. J. (1992) Estimating forage intakes and energy requirements of free-ranging wapiti (Cervus elaphus).Can. J. Zool. 70, 675–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, Z. and Hudson, R. J. (1993) Foraging postures of wapiti (Cervus elaphus).Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. (in press).

  • Kadmon, R. and Shmida, A. (1992) Departure rules used by bees foraging for nectar: a field test.Evol. Ecol. 6, 142–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, J. R. and Inmant, A. J. (1992) Learning and foraging: individuals, groups and populations.Am. Nat. 140, S63–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, J. R., Houston, A. I. and Charnov, E. L. (1981) Some recent developments in optimal foraging. InForaging Behavior, Ecological, Ethological, and Psychological Approaches (A. C. Kamil and T. D. Sargent, eds), pp. 3–18. Garland STPM Press, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNair, J. N. (1982) Optimal giving-up time and the marginal value theorem.Am. Nat. 119, 511–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novellie, P. A. (1978) Comparison of the foraging strategies of blesbok and springbok on the Transvaal highland.South Africa J. Wildl. Res. 8, 137–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pleasants, J. M. (1989) Optimal foraging by nectarivores: a test of the marginal-value theorem.Am. Nat. 134, 51–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senft, R. L., Coughenour, M. B., Bailey, D. W., Rittenhouse, L. R., Sala, O. E. and Swift, D. M. (1987) Large herbivore foraging and ecological hierarchies.BioScience 37, 789–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R. R. and Rohlf, F. J. (1989)Biometry, 2nd ed, pp. 421–3, p. 509. W. H. Freeman and Company, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jiang, Z., Hudson, R.J. Optimal grazing of wapiti (Cervus elaphus) on grassland: Patch and feeding station departure rules. Evol Ecol 7, 488–498 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01237643

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01237643

Keywords

Navigation