Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The human suprathreshold photopic oscillatory potentials: Method of analysis and clinical application

  • Published:
Documenta Ophthalmologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The oscilliatory potentials (OPs) of the electroretinogram (ERG) identify the high frequency wavelets which are seen riding on the top of the ascending limb of the b-wave. Despite the refinement in ERG recording techniques, which now allow for a more selective amplification of the OPs, their clinical utility still remains somewhat limited. Furthermore, while it has long been recognized that the different OPs which builds a given response are generated by distinct retinal events, amplitudes of clinically recorded oscillatory potentials are still reported using the artificial variable ‘sum of OPs (SOPs)’ which represent the sum amplitude of all the OPs identified in a given response; a method which is prone to compromise the diagnostic possibilities of the oscillatory potential response. The purpose of this report is to present a method of analysis of the OP response which is based on the relative amplitude of each OP. For the sake of clarity this report will focus on the analysis of the suprathreshold photopic OP response evoked the flash for 8.9 cd-m−2-sec in energy delivered against a rod desensitizing background of 30 cd-m−2 in luminance. The amplitude of each of the three major OPs (ie: OP2, OP3 and OP4) that normally compose this response was reported in relative units (ie: OP x /SOPs) a method shown to minimize intersubject variability and at the same time allow for each OP to be evaluated individually. With the above method I have reviewed 289 clinical OP responses collected during a 7 year interval and identified more than 10 different categories of responses of which 6 were shown to demonstrate specific anomalies for one or two OPs. The selectivity and reproducibility of my observation were confirmed on follow-up testings as well as in pedigree studies. Use of this method of OP analysis should significantly increase the clinical utility of the oscillatory potentials and also facilitate comparisons between clinical laboratories.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Speros P, Price J. Oscillatory potentials. History, techniques and potential use in the evaluation of disturbances of retinal circulation. Surv Ophthalmol 1981; 251: 237–52.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bresnick GH, Palta M. Predicting progression to severe proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Arch Ophthalmol 1987; 105: 810–4.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bresnick GH, Palta M. Oscillatory potential amplitudes. Relation to severity of diabetic retinopathy. Arch Ophthalmol 1987; 105: 929–33.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Van Der Torren K, Van Lith G. Oscillatory potentials in early diabetic retinopathy. Doc Ophthalmol 1989; 71: 375–9.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brunette JR, Lafond G. Electroretinographic evaluation of diabetic retinopathy. Sensitivity of amplitude and time of response. Can J Ophthalmol 1983; 18: 285–9.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cobb WA, Morton HB. A new component of the human electroretinogram. J Physiol 1954; 123: 36–7.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wachtmeister L. Basic research and clinical aspects of the oscillatory potentials of the electroretinogram. Doc Ophthalmol 1987; 66: 187–94.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Brunette JR, Lafond G. Double a-waves and their relationship to the oscillatory potentials. Invest Ophthalmol 1972; 11: 199–210.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Brown KT. The electroretinogram: Its components and their origins. Vision Res 1968; 8: 633–77.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ogden TE. The oscillatory waves of the primate electroretinogram. Vision Res 1973; 13: 1059–73.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Karwoski C, Kawasaki K. Oscillatory potentials. In: Heckenlively JR, Arden GB, eds. Principles and practice of clinical electrophysiology of vision. St. Louis: Mosby Year Book, 1991: 125–8.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wachtmeister L, Dowling JE. The oscillatory potentials of the mudpuppy retina. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1978, 17: 1176–88.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wachtmeister L. Further studies of the chemical sensitivity of the oscillatory potentials of the electroretinogram (ERG). Acta Ophthalmol 1980; 58: 712–25.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wachtmeister L. Further studies of the chemical sensitivity of the oscillatory potentials of the electroretinogram (ERG), II: Glutamate-aspartate- and dopamine antagonists. Acta Ophthalmol 1981a; 59: 247–58.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wachtmeister L. Further studies of the chemical sensitivity of the oscillatory potentials of the electroretinogram (ERG), III; Some Ω amino acids and ethanol. Acta Ophthalmol 1981b; 59: 609–19.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Guite P, Lachapelle P. The effect of 2-amino-4-phosphonobutyric acid on the oscillatory potentials of the electroretinogram. Doc Ophthalmol 1990; 75: 125–33.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lachapelle P, Benoit J, Guite P, Cuong TN, Molotchnikoff S. The effect of iodoacetic acid on the electroretinogram and oscillatory potentials in rabbits. Doc Ophthalmol 1990; 75: 7–14.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lachapelle P, Blain L, Quigley MG, Polomeno RC, Molotchnikoff S. The effect of diphenylhydantoin on the electroretinogram. Doc Ophthalmol 1990; 73: 359–68.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lachapelle P. Analysis of the photopic electroretinogram recorded before and after darkadaptation. Can J Ophthalmol 1987; 22: 354–61.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lachapelle P. The effect of slow flicker on the human photopic oscillatory potentials. Vision Res 1991; 31: 1851–7.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lachapelle P, Benoit J, Blain L, Guité P, Roy M-S. The oscillatory potentials in response to stimuli of photopic intensities delivered in dark-adaptation: An explanation for the conditioning flash effect. Vision Res 1990; 30: 503–13.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lachapelle P. Evidence for an intensity-coding oscillatory potential in the human electroretinogram. Vision Res 1991; 31: 767–74.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kojima M, Zrenner E. Off-components in response to brief light flashes in the oscillatory potentials of the human electroretinogram. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1978; 206: 107–20.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Peachey NS, Alexander KR, Derlacki DJ, Bobak P, Fishman GA. Effects of light adaptation on the response characteristics of human oscillatory potentials. EEG Clin Neurophysiol 1991; 78: 27–34.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Peachey NS, Alexander KR, Fishman GA. Rod and cone system contributions to oscillatory potential: An explanation for the conditioning flash effect. Vision Res 1987; 27: 859–66.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Gorfinkel J, Lachapelle P, Molotchnikoff S. Maturation of the electroretinogram of the neonatal rabbit. Doc Ophthalmol 1988; 69: 237–45.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Gorfinkel J, Lachapelle P. Maturation of the photopic b-wave and oscillatory potentials of the electroretinogram in the neonatal rabbit. Can J Ophthalmol 1990; 25: 138–44.

    Google Scholar 

  28. el Azazi M, Wachtmeister L. The postnatal development of the oscillatory potentials of the electroretinogram, I: Basic characteristics. Acta Ophthalmol 1990; 68: 401–9.

    Google Scholar 

  29. el Azazi M, Wachtmeister L. The postnatal development of the oscillatory potentials of the electroretinogram, II: Photopic characteristics. Acta Ophthalmol 1991; 69: 6–10.

    Google Scholar 

  30. King-Smith PE, Loffing DH, Jones R. Rod and cone ERGs and their oscillatory potentials. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1986; 27: 270–3.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Dawson WW, Stewart HL. Signals within the electroretinogram. Vision Res 1968; 8: 1265–70.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Lachapelle P, Little JM, Polomeno RC. The photopic electroretinogram in congenital stationary night blindness with myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1983; 24: 442–50.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Heckenlively JR, Martin DA, Rosenbaum AL. Loss of electroretinographic oscillatory potentials, optic atrophy, and dysplasia in congenital stationary night blindness. Am J Ophthalmol 1983; 96: 526–34.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Miyake Y, Yagasaki K, Horiguchi M, Kawase Y, Kanda T. Congenital stationary night blindness with negative electroretinogram: A new classification. Arch Ophthalmol 1986; 104: 1013–20.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Peachey NS, Fishman GA, Kilbride OE, Alexander KR, Keehan KM, Derlacki DJ. A form of congenital stationary night blindness with apparent defect of rod phototransduction. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1990; 31: 237–46.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Noble KG, Carr RE, Siegel IM. Autosomal dominant congenital stationary night blindness and normal fundus with an electronegative electroretinogram. Am J Ophthalmol 1990; 109: 44–8.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Weleber RG, Pillers D-AM, Powell BR, Hanna CE, Magenis RE, Buist NRM. Aland island eye disease (Forsius-Eriksson syndrome) associated with contiguous deletion syndrome at Xp21. Arch Ophthalmol 1989; 107: 1170–9.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Berson EL, Lessell S. Paraneoplastic night blindness with malignant melanoma. Am J Ophthalmol 1988; 106: 307–11.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Young RSL, Chaparro A, Price J, Walters J. Oscillatory potentials of X-linked carriers of congenital stationary night blindness. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1989; 30: 806–12.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Weleber RG, Eisner A. Retinal function and physiological studies. In: Newsome DA, ed. Retinal dystrophies and degenerations. New York: Raven Press, 1988: 21–69.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Khani-Oskouee H, Sieving PA. A digital band-pass filter for electrophysiology recording systems. In: Heckenlively JR, Arden GB, eds. Principles and practice of clinical electrophysiology of vision. St. Louis: Mosby Year Book, 1991: 205–10.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Lachapelle P, Quigley MG, Polomeno RC, Little JM. Abnormal dark-adapted electroretinogram in Best's vitelliform macular degeneration. Can J Ophthalmol 1988; 23: 279–84.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Marmor MF, Arden GB, Nilsson SEG, Zrenner E. Standard for clinical electroretinography. Arch Ophthalmol 1989; 107: 816–9.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Lachapelle P. A possible contribution of the optic nerve to the photopic oscillatory potentials. Clin Vision Sci 1990; 5: 421–6.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Lachapelle P, Little JM. Abnormal light-adaptation of the electroretinogram in some carriers of choroideremia. Clin Vis Sci 1992; 7: 403–11.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Lachapelle P, Benoit J, Little JM, Faubert J. The diagnostic use of the second oscillatory potential in clinical electroretinography. Doc Ophthalmol 1990; 73: 327–36.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Lachapelle P, Little JM, Roy M-S. The electroretinogram in Stargardt's disease and fundus flavimaculatus. Doc Ophthalmol 1990; 73: 395–404.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Ophthalmology (D-289), McGill University, Montreal Children's Hospital, 2300 Tupper Street, H3H 1P3, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

    Pierre Lachapelle

Authors
  1. Pierre Lachapelle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lachapelle, P. The human suprathreshold photopic oscillatory potentials: Method of analysis and clinical application. Doc Ophthalmol 88, 1–25 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01203698

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01203698

Key words

Search

Navigation