Skip to main content
Log in

Protein quality traits of vegetable and field peas: Varietal differences

  • Published:
Plant Foods for Human Nutrition Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Four high yielding varieties of field (Rachna and RFP4) and vegetable peas (Bonnivielle and Arkal) were studied for their protein quality. Crude protein and true protein content of all four pea varieties varied from 19.5 to 20.6 percent and 18.7 to 19.8 percent, respectively. Non protein nitrogen formed only 3.94 to 4.84 percent of total nitrogen. Globulins were the major fractions followed by albumins and glutelins. All the four varieties of peas had similar methionine and tryptophan content. Lysine content of four pea varieties ranged from 7.56 to 9.65 g per 16 g of N. Cooking brought about an increase in in vitro protein digestibility of peas by 10 percent. The sodium dodecyl polyacrylamidegel electrophoresis of total protein revealed the presence of 22–25 bands with some difference in banding pattern of all four varieties. Some differences were observed in banding patterns of globulin and albumin of all four varieties, suggesting that composition of protein of pea varieties differed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Savage GP, Deo S (1989) The nutritional value of peas (Pisum sativum): A literature review. Nutr Abst Rev (Series A) 59: 66–83.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Association of Official Analytical Chemists (1980) Officials methods of Analysis, 13th ed. Washington DC.

  3. Osborne DR, Voogt P (1978) Proteins and nitrogenous compounds. In: GF Steward, CO Chickestar, MEN Hawthorn, JK Scort, EV Syden, AF Horgan (eds.) The Analysis of Nutrients in Foods. Academic Press, New York, London, pp. 120–121.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Naik MS (1968) Lysine and tryptophan in protein fractions of sorghum. Indian J Nutr Dietet 28: 15–24.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Singh U, Raja SM, Jambunathan R (1981) Studies on desi and kabuli chickpea (Cicer arietium L.) cultivars, II: Seed protein fractions and amino acid composition. J Food Sci Technol 18: 86–88.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gupta VP, Das NB (1954) Estimation of methionine in wheat. Sci Cult 20: 90–91.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Maccarthy YE, Paille MN (1959) A rapid determination of methionine in crude protein. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1: 29–33.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ascarelli, Gestetner B (1962) Chemical and biological evaluation of some protein feeds for poultry. J Sci Food Agric 13: 401–410.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Felker P, Labanaurkas CK, Wainer G (1978) A colorimetric screening assay for lysine in wheat using trinitro-benzene sulfonic acid. Crop Sci 18: 489–490.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Smith AM, Agiza AH (1951) The amino acids of several grassland species, cereals and bracken. J Sci Food Agric 2: 503–520.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Laemelli VK (1970) Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of head of bacteriophage Ty. Nature 227: 680–685.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Akeson WE, Stahmann MA (1964) A pepsin pancreatin digest complex of proteins quality evaluation. J Nutr 83: 257–259.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Singh U, Jambunathan R (1981) Studies on desi and kabuli chickpea (Cicer arietrium L.) cultivars: Levels of protease inhibitor, level of polyphenolic compounds and in vitro digestibility. J Food Sci 46: 1364–1367.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Panse YG, Sukhatme PV (1961) Statistical Methods of Agricultural Workers, 2nd ed. Indian Council of Agril Research, New Delhi, pp. 12–87.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gueguen J, Barbot J (1988) Quantitative and qualitative variability of pea (Pisum sativum) protein composition. J Sci Food Agric 42: 209–224.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gupta YP (1987) Antinutritional and toxic factors in food legumes: A review. Plant Foods Human Nutr 37: 201–228.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kataria A, Chauhan BM, Gandhi S (1988) Effects of domestic processing and cooking on the antinutrients of blackgram. Food Chem 30: 149–156.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jood S, Chauhan BM, Kapoor AC (1987) Polyphenols of chickpea and blackgram as affected by domestic processing and cooking methods. J Sci Food Agric 39: 145–150.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jood S, Chauhan BM, Kapoor AC (1986) Saponins content of chickpea and blackgram: Varietal differences and effects of processing and cooking method. J Sci Food Agric 37: 1121–1124.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Schroedar HE (1982) Quantitative studies on the cotyledonary proteins in the genus pisum. J Sci Food Agric 33: 623–633.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bhatty RS (1982) Albumins proteins of eight edible grain legumes: Electrophoretic patterns and amino acid composition. J Agric Food Chem 30: 620–632.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Murray DR, Varinhos F (1982) Z Pflanz Physiol 106: 465–468.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Reddy SJ, McGinnis J, Muelbauer F, Campbell A (1979) Methionine content and availability in varieties and breeding lines of peas for chicks. Poult Sci 58: 376–381.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Evans IM, Boulter O (1980) Crude proteins and sulphur amino acid content of some commercial varieties of peas and beans. J Sci Food Agric 31: 238–242.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Reichert R, Mackenzie SL (1982) Composition of peasPisum sativum varying widely in proteins content. J Agric Food Chem 30: 312–317.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Duncan A, Ellinger GM, Glennir RJ (1984) Determination of methionine by gas liquid chromatography: Modifications in its application to legumes and cereals. J Sci Food Agric 35: 381–384.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Bhatnagar P (1986) Evaluation of the protein quality of Ricebean (Vigna umbelleta) M.Sc. Thesis, Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, India.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Mahajan R, Malhotra SP, Singh R (1988) Characterization of seed proteins of urdbean. Plant Foods Human Nutr 38: 163–173.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lafiandra LP, Poligneno GB, Golaprico G (1979) Proteins content and amino acid composition of seed in varieties ofVicia faba L. Z Pflanzenzuch 83: 308–311.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Saharan, K., Khetarpaul, N. Protein quality traits of vegetable and field peas: Varietal differences. Plant Food Hum Nutr 45, 11–22 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01091225

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01091225

Key words

Navigation