Skip to main content
Log in

The use of syntactic information in filling gaps

  • Published:
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two sentence-comprehension time experiments replicated and extended previously reported research indicating that readers initially make a quick, heuristic assignment of fillers to gaps in temporarily ambiguous sentences such as “Who did John beg to sing?” and “Who did John beg to sing for?” The Most Recent Filler heuristic readers seemed to adopt made the former “distant filler” sentence harder to comprehend than the latter “recent filler” sentence. Readers did not in general use all available sources of information in making this assignment. In particular, they usually delayed their use of verb control information so that substituting the unambiguous-control verbs “force” or “begin” for “beg” did not eliminate the distant filler inferiority. the experiments counter some criticisms that have been made of the previously reported research. The possibility that readers delay using an interesting natural category of information was raised, and its implications for the mental grammar were considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bever, T. (1970). The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. In J. R. Hayes (Ed.),Cognition and the development of language (pp. 279–352) New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1973). Conditions on transformations. In S. R. Anderson & P. Kiparsky (Eds.),A festscrift for Morris Halle New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1981).Lectures on government and binding: The Pisa lectures. Dordrecht, Holland: Foris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clifton, C. J., Frazier, L., & Connine C. (1984). Lexical expectations in sentence comprehension.Journal of Verbal Learning and Vebal Behavior, 23, 696–708.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crain, S., & Fodor, J. D. (1985). How can grammars help parsers? In D. R. Dowty, L. Karttunen, & A. M. Zwicky (Eds.),Natural Language parsing, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foldor, J., Bever, T., & Garrett, M. (1974).The psychology of language: An introduction to psycholinguistics and generative grammar, New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J., & Garrett, M. (1966). Some reflections on competence and performance. In J. Lyons & R. J. Wales (Eds.),Psycholinguistic papers (pp. 135–154), Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frazier, L. (1985a). Modularity and the representational hypothesis.Proceedings of the New England Linguistics Society, Providence, Rhode Island, November 1984. Amherst, Massachusetts: GLSA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frazier, L. (1985b).Syntactic processing: Evidence from Dutch. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Frazier, L., Clifton, C. J., & Randall, J. (1983). Filling gaps: Decision principles and structure in sentence comprehension.Cognition, 13, 187–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, S. A., & Forster, K. I. (1985). The psychological status of overgenerated sentences.Cognition, 19, 101–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gazdar, G. (1981). Unbounded dependencies and coordinate structure.Linguistic Inquiry, 12, 155–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gazdar, G. (1982). Phrase structure grammar. In P. Jacobson & Geoffrey K. Pullum (Eds.),The nature of syntactic representation. Dordrecht, Holland: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, K., Carlson, M., & Frazier, L. (1983). The interaction of syntax and semantics during sentence processing: Eye movements in the analysis of semantically biased sentences.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 358–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, J. (1967).constraints on variables in syntax. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, M.I.T.

  • Stowe, L. (1984).Models of gap-location in the human language processor, Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valian, V. (1979). The wherefores and therefores of the competence-performance distinction: In W. Cooper & E. C. T. Walker (Eds.),Sentence processing, Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watt, W. (1970). On two hypotheses concerning psycholinguistics. In J. R. Hayes, (Eds.),Cognition and the development of language (pp. 137–220). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Clifton, C., Frazier, L. The use of syntactic information in filling gaps. J Psycholinguist Res 15, 209–224 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067455

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067455

Keywords

Navigation