Skip to main content
Log in

The rule of reproducibility and its applications in experiment appraisal

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Airy, George: 1831,Mathematical Tract on the Lunar Planetary Theories, the Figures of the Earth, Precession and Nutation, the Calculus of Variations, and the Undulatory Theory of Optics, Deighton, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Airy, George: 1847, ‘On Sir David Brewster's New Analysis of Solar Light’,Philosophical Magazine 30, 73–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, G. P., and P. M. S. Hacker: 1984,Scepticism, Rules and Language, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, Peter: 1986, ‘Wittgenstein and Authority of Science’, in W. Leinfellner and F. Wuketits (eds.),The Task of Contemporary Phllosophy, Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky, Vienna, pp. 265–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, Peter: 1988, ‘The Reflexivity Problem in the Psychology of Science’, in B. Gholson et al. (eds.),Psychology of Science, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 92–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barsalou, Lawrence: 1987, ‘The Instability of Graded Structure: Implication for the Nature of Concepts’, in U. Neisser (ed.),Concept and Conceptual Development: Ecological and Intellectual Factors in Categorization, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 101–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barsalou, Lawrence, and Daniel Sewell: 1984, ‘Constructing Representations of Categories from Different Points of View’, Emory Cognition Project Report #2, Emory University, Atlanta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloor, David: 1991,Knowledge and Social Imagery, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewster, David: 1834, ‘On A New Analysis of Solar Light, Indicating Three Primary Colours, Forming Coincident Spectra of Equal Length’,Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 12, 123–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewster, David: 1837, Review of Whewell'sHistory of the Inductive Sciences, Edinburgh Review 66, 58–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewster, David: 1847a, ‘Reply to the Astronomer Royal on the New Analysis of Solar Light’,Philosophical Magazine 30, 153–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewster, David: 1847b, ‘Observations on the Analysis of the Spectrum by Absorption’,Philosophical Magazine 30, 461–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewster, David: 1848, ‘Observations on the Elementary Colours of the Spectrum, in Reply to M. Melloni’,Philosophical Magazine 32, 489–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewster, David: 1965,Memoirs of the Life, Writings and Discoveries of Sir Isaac Newton, Johnson Reprint, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Xiang: 1990, ‘Local Incommensurability and Communicability’, in A. Fine, M. Forbes, and L. Wessels (eds.),PSA 1990, Vol. I, Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, pp. 67–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, Harry: 1981, ‘Son of Seven Sexes: The Social Construction of A Physical Phenomenon’,Social Studies of Science 11, 33–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, Harry: 1985,Changing Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice, SAGE Publications, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, Hubert, and Stuart Dreyfus: 1986,Mind over Machine, Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, Allan: 1986,The Neglect of Experiment, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, Allan, and Colin Howson: 1988, ‘It Probably Is a Valid Experimental Result: A Bayesian Approach to the Epistemology of Experiment’,Study in the History and Philosophy of Science 19, 419–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gooding, David: 1989, ‘History in the Laboratory: Can We Tell What Really Went On?’, in F. James (ed.),The Development of the Laboratory, American Institute of Physics, New York, pp. 63–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hones, Michael: 1990, ‘Reproducibility as Methodological Imperative in Experimental Research’, in A. Fine, M. Forbes, and L. Wessels (eds.),PSA 1990, Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, pp. 585–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larmor, Joseph (ed.): 1971,Memoir and Scientific Correspondence of the Late Sir George G. Stokes, Johnson Reprint, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, Michael 1992, ‘Extending Wittgenstein: The Pivotal Move from Epistemology to the Sociology of Science’, in A. Pickering (ed.),Science as Practice and Culture, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 215–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malcolm, Norman: 1989, ‘Wittgenstein on Language and Rules’,Philosophy 64, 5–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulkay, Michael, and G. Nigel Gilbert: 1981, ‘Replication and Mere Replication’,Philosophy of Social Science 16, 21–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, Isaac: 1952,Opticks, Dover Publications, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, Karl: 1968,The Logic of Scientific Discovery, Hutchinson, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosch, Eleanor: 1978, ‘Principles of Categorization’, in E. Rosch and B. Lloyd (eds.),Cognition and Categorization, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp. 27–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosch, Eleanor, and C. Mervis: 1975, ‘Family Resemblances: Studies in the Internal Structure of Categories’,Cognitive Psychology 7, 573–605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapin, Steven, and Simon Schaffer: 1985,Leviathan and the Air-Pump, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whewell, William: 1967,History of the Inductive Sciences, Frank Cass, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig: 1958,Philosophical Investigation, 2nd ed., G. E. M. Anscombe and R. Rhees, trans. G. E. M. Anscombe, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig: 1978,Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics, 2nd ed., ed. G. E. M. Anscombe, R. Rhees, and G. H. von Wright, trans. G. E. M. Anscombe, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zucherman, Harriet: 1977, ‘Deviant Behaviour and Social Control in Science’, in E. Sagarin (ed.),Deviance and Social Change, Sage Publications, Beverley Hills, pp. 87–138.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, X. The rule of reproducibility and its applications in experiment appraisal. Synthese 99, 87–109 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01064532

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01064532

Navigation