Skip to main content
Log in

Reassessing the reliability and validity of self-report delinquency measures

  • Published:
Journal of Quantitative Criminology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Several issues related to the reliability and validity of self-report delinquency measures are raised and discussed. These include problems associated with the use of internal consistency as the measure of reliability, the level of reliability or precision required for different types of analyses, problems with the content validity of self-report measures, problems of overreporting and underreporting, problems with the use of official records as a validity check on self-reports, and the lack of any good criterion as a major obstacle in assessing the empirical validity of self-report measures. In the light of these problems, some cautions about the use of self-report measures are made.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • APA, Inc. (1974).Standards for Educational and Psychological Tests, American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachman, J. G., O'Malley, P. M., and Johnston, J. (1978).Adolescence to Adulthood: Change and Stability in the Lives of Young Men. Youth in Transition, Vol. VI, Institute of Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachman, J. G., Johnston, L. D., and O'Malley, P. M. (1984).Questionnaire Responses from the Nations High School Seniors, 1982, Institute of Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belson, W. A. (1968). The extent of stealing by London boys and some of its origins.Adv. Sci. 25: 171–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackmore, J. (1974). The relationship between self reported delinquency and official convictions amongst adolescent boys.Br. J. Criminol. 14: 172–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blakely, C. H., Kushler, M. A., Parisian, J. A., and Davidson, W. S. (1980). Self-reported delinquency on an evaluation measure.Crim. Just. Behav. 7: 369–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braukman, C. J., Kirigin, K. A., and Wolf, M. M. (1979). Social learning and social control perspectives in group home delinquency treatment research. Paper presented at the American Society of Criminology Meetings, Philadelphia.

  • Bridges, G. (1978). Errors in the measurement of crime: An application of Joreskogs method of analysis of general covariance structures. In Wellford, C. (ed.),Quantitative Studies in Criminology, Sage, Beverly Hills, pp. 9–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broder, P. K., and Zimmerman, J. (1978).Establishing the Reliability of Self-Reported Delinquency Data, National Center for State Courts, Williamsburg, Va.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chai, J. (1971). Correlated measurement errors and the least squares estimator of the regression coefficient.J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 66: 478–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chai, J., and Frankfurter, G. (1974). Errors in variables for the simple linear model: The effects of correlated errors of measurement on interval estimation and hypothesis testing. Proceedings of the Social Statistics Section, American Statistical Association.

  • Chaiken, J. M., and Chaiken, M. R. (1982).Varieties of Criminal Behavior, Rand Corp., Santa Monica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambliss, W. J., and Nagasawa, R. H. (1969). On the validity of official statistics: A comparative study of white, black and Japanese high school boys.J. Res. Crime Delinq. 6: 71–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christie, N., Andenaes, J., and Skirbekk, S. (1965), A study of self reported crime. In Christiansen, K. O. (ed.),Scandinavian Studies in Criminology, Vol 1, Tavistock, London, pp. 86–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, J. P., and Tift, L. L. (1966). Polygraph and interview validation of self reported delinquent behavior.Am. Sociol. Rev. 31: 516–523.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochran, W. C. (1963).Sampling Techniques, Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests.Psychometrika 16: 297–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dentler, R. A., and Monroe, L. J. (1961). Social correlates of early adolescent theft.Am. Sociol. Rev. 26: 733–743.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, D. S. (1982). A review essay on “Measuring Delinquency” by M. J. Hindelang, T. Hirschi, and J. G. Weis.Criminology 20: 527–537.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, D. S., and Ageton, S. S. (1980). Reconciling race and class differences in self-reported and official estimates of delinquency.Am. Sociol. Rev. 45(1): 95–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, D. S., and Huizinga, D. (1983). Social class and delinquent behavior in a national youth panel: 1976–1980.Criminology 21: 149–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, D. S., and Voss, H. L. (1974).Delinquency and Dropout, D. C. Heath, Lexington, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, D. S., Huizinga, D., and Ageton, S. S. (1985).Explaining Delinquency and Drug Use, Sage, Beverly Hills.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elmhorn, K. (1965). Study in self reported delinquency among school children in Stockholm, In Christiansen, K. O. (ed.),Scandinavian Studies in Criminology, Vol. 1, Tavistock, London, pp. 117–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, M., and Empey, L. T. (1963). Court records, undetected delinquency and decision-making.J. Crim. Law Criminol. Police Sci. 54: 456–469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrington, D. P. (1973). Self-reports of deviant behavior: Predictive and stable?J. Crim. Law Criminol. 64: 99–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrington, D. P. (1977). The effects of public labelling.Br. J. Criminol. 17: 112–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, E. L., and Hammerle, W. J. (1966). Robustness of the maximum likelihood estimation procedure in factor analysis.Psychometrika 31: 255–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garofalo, J., and Hindelang, M. J. (1977).An Introduction to the National Crime Survey, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, H. B., Morrison, S., and West, D. J. (1970). The confession of known offenses in response to a self-reported delinquency schedule.Br. J. Criminol. 10: 277–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold, M. (1970).Delinquent Behavior in an American City, Wadsworth, Belmont, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold, M., and Reimer, D. J. (1975). Changing patterns of delinquent behavior among Americans 13 through 16 years old: 1967–1972.Crime Deling. Lit. 7: 483–517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, L. C. (1969). Who defines delinquency: A comparison of self-reported and officially reported incidences of delinquency for three racial groups.Soc. Problems 16: 325–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackler, J. C., and Lautt, M. (1969). Systematic bias in measuring self-reported delinquency.Can. Rev. Sociol. Anthropol. 6: 92–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardt, R. H., and Bodine, G. F. (1965).Development of Self-Report Instruments in Delinquency Research, Youth Development Center, Syracuse University, Syracuse, N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardt, R. H., and Peterson-Hardt, S. (1977). On determining the quality of the delinquency self-report method.J. Res. Crime Delinq. 14: 247–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hathaway, R. S., Monachesi, E. D., and Young, L. A. (1960). Delinquency rates and personality.J. Crim. Law Criminol. Police Sci. 50: 433–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmstadter, G. C. (1970).Research Concepts in Human Behavior, Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hindelang, M. J., Hirschi, T., and Weis, J. G. (1979). Correlates of delinquency: The illusion of discrepancy between self-report and official measures.Am. Sociol. Rev. 44: 995–1014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hindelang, M. J., Hirschi, T., and Weis, J. G. (1981).Measuring Delinquency, Sage, Beverly Hills.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschi, T. (1969).Causes of Delinquency, University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huba, G. J., and Harlow, L. L. (1983). Comparison of maximum likelihood generalized least squares, ordinary least squares and asymptotically distribution free parameter estimates in drug abuse latent variable causal models.J. Drug. Educ. 13: 387–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huizinga, D., and Elliott, D. S. (1983). A preliminary examination of the reliability and validity of the national youth survey self-reported delinquency indices, National Youth Survey Project Report 27, Behavioral Research Institute, Boulder, Colo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huizinga, D. and Elliot, D. S. (1984). Self-reported measures of delinquency and crime: Methodological issues and comparative findings. National Youth Survey Project Report 30, Behavorial Research Institute, Boulder, Colo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, G. F., Erickson, M. L., and Gibbs, J. P. (1978). Perceived risk of punishment and self-reported delinquency.Soc. Forces 57: 57–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessor, R., Graves, T. D., Hanson, R. C., and Jessor, S. L. (1968).Society, Personality and Deviant Behavior: A Study of a Tri-Ethnie Community, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joreskog, K. (1970). A general method for analysis of covariance structures.Biometrika 57: 239–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joreskog, K. G., and Sorbom, D. (1978).LISREL IV: Analysis of Linear Structural Relationships by the Method of Maximum Likelihood, National Educational Resources, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, T. L. (1927).Interpretation of Educational Measurements, World Book, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuder, G. F., and Richardson, M. W. (1937). The theory of the estimation of test reliability.Psychometrica 2: 151–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulik, J. A., Stein, K. B., and Sarbin, T. R. (1968). Disclosure of delinquent behavior under conditions of anonymity and non-anonymity.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 32: 506–509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lab, S. P., and Allen, R. B. (1981). Issues in the use of self-report and official crime data. Paper presented at the 1981 meetings of the American Society of Criminology, Washington, D.C.

  • Marsden, M. E., and Meade, A. C. (1981). The extent, distribution and timing of delinquency: Implications of alternative defining criteria and approaches to measurement. In Meade, A. C. (ed.)Youth and Society: Studies of Adolescent Deviance, Institute for Juvenile Research, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunally, J. C. (1972).Educational Measurement and Evaluation, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye, F. I., and Short, Jr., J. F. (1957). Scaling delinquent behavior.Am. Sociol. Rev. 22: 326–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsson, V. (1979). On the robustness of factor analysis against crude classification of the observation.Multivar. Behav. Res. 14: 485–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paternoster, R. (1978).The Labelling Effects of Police Apprehension: Identity, Exclusion, and Secondary Deviance, Unpublished Ph.D dissertation, Florida State University, Tallahassee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, G. R., and Loeber, R. (1982). The understanding and prediction of delinquent child behavior. Research proposal to NIMH. Oregon Social Learning Center, Eugene.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersillia, J. (1978). Validity of criminality data derived from personal interviews. In Wellford, C. (ed.),Quantitative Studies in Criminology, Sage, Beverly Hills.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, A. J., Jr. (1975). Inappropriate theories and inadequate methods as policy plaques: self-reported delinquency and the law. In Demerath, N. J., III,et al. (eds.),Social Policy and Sociology, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rojek, D. G. (1983). Social status and delinquency: Do self-reports and official reports match. In Waldo, G. P. (ed.),Measurement Issues in Criminal Justice, Sage, Beverly Hills.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. J. (1985). Sex differences in self-reported delinquency and official records: A multiple group structural modeling approach.J. Quant. Criminol. 1: 345–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Short, J. F., Jr., and Nye, F. I. (1957). Reported behavior as a criterion of deviant behavior.Soc. Problems 5: 207–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Short, J. F., Jr. and Nye, F. I. (1958). Extent of unrecorded juvenile delinquency: tentative conclusions.J. Crim. Law and Criminol. 49: 296–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solnick, J. V., Braukmann, C. J., Bedlington, M. M., Kirigin, K. A., and Wolf, M. M. (1981). Parent-youth interaction and delinquency in group homes.J. Abnorm. Child Psychol. 9: 107–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, K. B., Vadum, A. C., and Sarbin, T. R. (1970). Socialization and delinquency: A study of false negatives and false positives in prediction.Psychol. Rec. 20: 353–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike, R. L. (1951). Reliability. In Linquest, E. F. (ed.),Educational Measurement, American Council of Education, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voss, H. L. (1963). Ethnic differentials in delinquency in Honolulu.J. Crim. Law Criminol. 54: 322–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyner, G. A. (1981). Response errors in self-reported number of arrests. In Bohrnstedt and Borgatta (eds.),Social Measurement, Sage, Beverly Hills.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Huizinga, D., Elliott, D.S. Reassessing the reliability and validity of self-report delinquency measures. J Quant Criminol 2, 293–327 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01064258

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01064258

Key words

Navigation