Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Sex differences in self-reported delinquency and official records: A multiple-group structural modeling approach

  • Published:
Journal of Quantitative Criminology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There has been a large increase in research in the last 10 years or so on the nature, extent, and causes of female delinquency, especially on how patterns differ from those of male delinquency. Few research efforts, however, have systematically examined sex differences in the reliability and construct validity of the most common technique used in causal research-the self—report method. The present study addresses this issue by empirically examining male-female differences in self-report reliabilities and the effect of the prevalence and incidence of delinquent behavior on official contact (i.e., arrest, court referrals). Multiple-group covriance structure models are employed to test hypotheses of measurement and structural invariance. The major conclusion is that while self-report measurement parameters (e.g., reliabilities) may differ, the structural link between the prevalence and incidence of delinquent behavior and official contact is generally invariant with respect to sex.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler, F. (1975).Sisters in Crime: The Rise of the New Female Criminal, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alwin, D., and Jackson, D. (1981). Applications of simultaneous factor analysis to issues of factorial invariance. In Jackson, D., and Borgatta, E. (eds.),Factor Analysis and Measurement in Sociological Research, Sage, Beverly Hills, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M., and Bonett, D. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures.Psychol. Bull. 88: 588–606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bielby, W., Hauser, R., and Featherman, D. (1977). Response errors of black and nonblack males in models of the intergenerational transmission of socioeconomic status.Am. J. Sociol. 82: 1242–1288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, D., and Farnworth, M. (1984). Gender explanations of delinquent behavior. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology, Cincinnati, Ohio.

  • Black, D., and Reiss, A. (1970). Police control of juveniles.Am. Sociol. Rev. 35: 63–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, J. (1981). The myth of social class and criminality reconsidered.Am. Sociol. Rev. 46: 36–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridges, G. (1981). Estimating the effects of response errors in self-reports of crime. In Fox, J. A. (ed.),Methods in Quantitative Criminology, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmines, E., and Zeller, R. (1979).Reliability and Validity Assessment, Sage, Beverly Hills, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clelland, D., and Carter, T. (1980). The new myth of class and crime.Criminology 18: 319–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Datesman, S. (1983). Theories of female crime. American Society of Criminology Panel at the annual meeting, Denver, Colo.

  • DuMouchel, W., and Duncan, G. (1983). Using sample survey weights in multiple regression analyses of stratified samples.J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 78: 535–543.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, D., and Ageton, S. (1980). Reconciling race and class differences in self-reported and official estimates of delinquency.Am. Sociol. Rev. 45: 95–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, D., Huizinga, D., and Ageton, S. (1985).Explaining Delinquency and Drug Use, Sage, Beverly Hills, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farnworth, M. (1984). Male-female differences in delinquency in a minority-group sample.J. Res. Crime Delinq. 21: 191–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrington, D. (1979). Longitudinal research on crime and delinquency. In Morris, N., and Tonry, M. (eds.),Crime and Justice: An Annual Review of Research, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Figueira-McDonough, J., Barton, W., and Sarri, R. (1981). Normal deviance: Gender similarities in adolescent subcultures. In Warren, M. (ed.),Comparing Female and Male Offenders, Sage, Beverly Hills, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glueck, S., and Glueck, E. (1950).Unraveling Juvenile Delinquency, Commonwealth Fund, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, M., and Gottfredson, D. (1981).Decision Making in Criminal Justice, Ballinger, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenburg, D. (1979). Delinquency and the age structure of society. In Messinger, S., and Bittner, E. (eds.),Criminology Review Yearbook, Sage, Beverly Hills, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, D. (1985). Age, crime, and social explanation.Am. J. Sociol. 91: 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagan, J., Gillis, A., and Simpson, J. (1985). The class structure of gender and delinquency: Toward a power-control theory of common delinquent behavior.Am. J. Sociol. 90: 1151–1178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A. (1977). Sex and theories of deviance: Toward a functional theory of deviant type-scripts.Am. Sociol. Rev. 42: 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hindelang, M. (1971). Age, sex, and the versatility of delinquent involvements.Soc. Problems 18: 522–535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hindelang, M. (1979). Sex differences in criminal activity.Soc. Problems 27: 143–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hindelang, M., Hirschi, T., and Weis, J. (1981).Measuring Delinquency, Sage, Beverly Hills, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschi, T. (1969).Causes of Delinquency, University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschi, T., and Gottfredson, M. (1983). Age and the explanation of crime.Am. J. Sociol. 89: 553–584.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, G., and Eve, R. (1976). Sex differences in delinquency: An examination of popular sociological explanations.Criminology 14: 427–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joreskog, K. (1971). Simultaneous factor analysis in several populations.Psychometrika 34: 183–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joreskog, K., and Sorbom, D. (1984).LISREL VI: Analysis of Linear Structural Relationships by the Method of Maximum Likelihood, Scientific Software, Mooresville, Ind.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleck, G. (1982). On the use of self-report data to determine the class distribution of criminal and delinquent behavior.Am. Sociol. Rev. 47: 427–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krohn, M., Curry, J., and Nelson-Kilger, S. (1983). Is chivalry dead? An analysis of changes in police dispositions of males and females.Criminology 21: 417–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, J. S. (1983).Covariance Structure Models, Sage, Beverly Hills, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mare, R., and Mason, W. (1980). Children's reports of parental socioeconomic status: A multiple group measurement model.Sociol. Methods Res. 9: 178–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsueda, R. (1982). Testing control theory and differential association: A causal modelling approach.Am. Sociol. Rev. 47: 489–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nettler, G. (1984).Explaining Crime, Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersilia, J. (1978). Validity of criminality data derived from personal interviews. In Wellford, C. (ed.),Quantitative Studies in Criminology, Sage, Beverly Hills, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersilia, J. (1980). Criminal career research: A review of recent evidence. In Morris, N., and Tonry, M. (eds.),Crime and Justice: An Annual Review of Research, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piliavin, I., and Briar, S. (1964). Police encounters with juveniles.Am. J. Sociol. 70: 206–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, A. J., Jr. (1971).The Police and the Public, Yale University Press, New Haven, Conn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, A. J., Jr. (1975). Inappropriate theories and inadequate methods as policy plagues: Self-reported delinquency and the law. In Demerath, N. J., III,et al. (eds.),Social Policy and Sociology, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robins, L. (1966).Deviant Children Grown Up, Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, Md.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rojek, D., and Erickson, M. (1982). Delinquent careers: A test of the career escalation model.Criminology 20: 5–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, R. (1975).Women and Crime, D. C. Heath, Lexington, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K. (1976). Analyzing disproportionately stratified samples with computerized statistical packages.Sociol. Methods Res. 5: 207–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorbom, D. (1974). A general method for studying differences in factor means and factor structures between groups.Br. J. Math. Stat. Psychol. 28: 138–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffensmeier, D. (1978). Crime and the contemporary woman: An analysis of changing levels of female property crime.Soc. Forces 57: 566–584.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visher, C. (1983). Gender, police arrest decisions, and notions of chivalry.Criminology 21: 5–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, D., and Farrington, D. (1977).The Delinquent Way of Life, Heinemann, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfgang, M., Figlio, R., and Sellin, T. (1972).Delinquency in a Birth Cohort, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sampson, R.J. Sex differences in self-reported delinquency and official records: A multiple-group structural modeling approach. J Quant Criminol 1, 345–367 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01064186

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01064186

Key words

Navigation