Abstract
The philosophical basis for Jurgen Habermas' later work is a communicative one: our ability to understand nature, society, and even ourselves arises from our communication with each other. “Lifeworld” is a key concept in this work, elaborated well beyond the lifeworld concept in the work of, e.g., Schutz. This paper describes Habermas' theory, relating it to his theories of communicative action and of societal steering media. It also suggests some parallels with the work of Vickers and makes proposals for the practical use of Habermas' lifeworld concept.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beer, S. (1981).Brain of the Firm, 2nd ed., John Wiley, Chichester.
Checkland, P. B. (1981).Systems Thinking, Systems Practice, John Wiley, Chichester.
Checkland, P. B., and Casar, A. (1986). Vickers' concept of an appreciative system: A systemic account.J. Appl. Syst. Anal. 13, 3–17.
Dodgson, M. (1991).The Management of Technological Learning: Lessons from a Biotechnology Company, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin.
Fairtlough, G. H. (1989). Systems practice from the start: Some experiences in a bio technology company.Syst. Pract. 2, 397–412.
Fairtlough, G. H. (1990). A model of capitalism derived from communication theory.Futures 22, 69–77.
Flood, R. L. (1990).Liberating Systems Theory, Plenum, New York.
Habermas, J. (1975).Legitimation Crisis, Beacon Press, Boston.
Habermas, J. (1982). A reply to my critics. In Thompson, J. B., and Held, D. (eds.),Habermas. Critical Debates, Macmillan, London, pp. 219–283.
Habermas, J. (1984).The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. 1, Heinemann, London.
Habermas, J. (1987).The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. 2, Polity Press, Cambridge, U.K.
Habermas, J. (1988).On the Logic of the Social Sciences, Polity Press, Cambridge, U.K.
Held, D. (1982). Crisis tendencies, legitimation and the state. In Thompson, J. B., and Held, D. (eds.),Habermas. Critical Debates, Macmillan, London, pp. 181–195.
Horkheimer, M., and Adorno, T. (1973).Dialectic of Enlightenment, Allen Lane, London.
Jackson, M. C. (1982). The nature of “soft” systems thinking: The work of Churchman, Ackoff and Checkland.J. Appl. Syst. Anal. 9, 17–29.
Jackson, M. C. (1983). The nature of “Soft” systems thinking: Comment on the three replies.J. Appl. Syst. Anal. 10, 109–113.
Jackson, M. C. (1990). The critical kernel in modern systems thinking.Syst. Pract. 3, 357–363.
Luhmann, N. (1982).The Differentiation of Society, Colombia University Press, New York.
Luhmann, N., and Habermas, J. (1971).Theorie der Gesellschaft oder Sozialtechnologie-Was leistet die Systemforschung? Suhrkamp, Frankfurt.
Marcuse, H. (1964).One Dimensional Man, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
Mingers, J. C. (1980). Towards an appropriate theory for applied systems thinking: Critical theory and soft systems methodology.J. Appl. Syst. Anal. 7, 41–49.
Sperling, J. (1990). After the wall.Coverdale Rev. 4, 5–6.
Ulrich, W. (1983).Critical Heuristics of Social Planning: A New Approach to Practical Philosophy, Haupt, Berne.
Ulrich, W. (1988). Systems thinking, systems practice, and practical philosophy: A program of research.Syst. Pract. 1, 137–163.
Vickers, G. (1965).The Art of Judgment, Chapman and Hall, London.
Vickers, G. (1968).Value Systems and Social Process, Tavistock, London.
Vickers, G. (1972).Freedom in a Rocking Boat: Changing Values in an Unstable Society, Penguin, Harmondsworth.
White, S. K. (1988).The Recent Work of Jurgen Habermas, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fairtlough, G.H. Habermas' concept of “Lifeworld”. Systems Practice 4, 547–563 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01063113
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01063113