Skip to main content
Log in

The cognitive theories of Maturana and Varela

  • Papers
  • Published:
Systems practice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Maturana and Varela developed the concept of autopoiesis to explain the phenomena of living organisms. They went further and postulated theories concerning the nervous system and the development of cognition. These theories have radical conclusions concerning human thought, language, and social activity. This paper aims to introduce these ideas and to explore the main implications. It also discusses the application of these cognitive theories in three separate domains-computer systems design, family therapy, and the Law.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bateson, G. (1973).Steps to an Ecology of Mind, Granada, Hertfordshire.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, G. (1979).Mind and Nature: A Necessary Unity, Dutton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D., and Draper, R. (eds.) (1985).Applications of Systemic Family Therapy: The Milan Method, Grune and Stratton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dell, P. (1985). Understanding Bateson and Maturana: Towards a biological foundation for the social sciences.J. Marit. Family Ther. 11, 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, H. (1975).Truth and Method, Seabury Press, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goolishian, H., and Winderman, L. (1988). Constructivism, autopoiesis and problem determined systems,Irish J. Psychol. 9, 130–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1987).The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. 2, Polity Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harnden, R. (1990). The languaging of models: The understanding and communication of models with particular reference to Stafford Beer's cybernetic model of organization structure.Syst. Pract. 3, 289–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiddegger, M. (1962).Being and Time, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, T. (1987). Accounting for law. In Teubner, G. (ed.),Autopoiesis and the Law, de Gruyter, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, L. (1988). A constructivist position for family therapy,Irish J. Psychol. 9, 110–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, L. (1990). Constructing realities: An art of lenses.Family Proc. 29, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, D. (1957). The question of family homeostasis.Psychiat. Q. Suppl. 31, 79–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeney, B. (1983).Aesthetics of Change, Guilford Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennealy, P. (1987). Talking about autopoiesis: Order form noise? In Teubner, G. (ed.),Autopoiesis and the Law, de Gruyter, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, V., and Gardner, G. (1988). Constructions of self-organising systems.Irish J. Psychol. 9, 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1986). The autopoiesis of social systems. In Geyer, F., and van der Zouwen, J. (eds.),Sociocybernetic Paradoxes, Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1987a). The unity of the legal system. In Teubner, G. (ed.),Autopoiesis and the Law, de Gruyter, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1987b). Closure and openness: On reality in the world of law. In Teubner, G. (ed.),Autopoiesis and the Law, de Gruyter, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H. R. (1975a). The organization of the living: A theory of the living organization.Int. J. Man Machine Stud. 7, 313–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H. R. (1975b). Communication and representation Functions. In Piaget, J. (ed.),Encyclopedie de la Pleiade, Gallimard, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H. R. (1978). Biology of language: The epistemology of reality. In Millar, G., and Lenneberg, E. (eds.),Psychology and Biology of Language and Thought: Essays in Honour of Eric Lenneberg, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H. R. (1980a). Autopoiesis: Reproduction, heredity and evolution In Zeleny, M. (ed.),Autopoiesis, Dissipative Structures and Spontaneous Social Orders, AAAS Selected Symposium 55, Westview Press, Boulder, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H. R. (1980b). Man and society. In Benseler, F., Hejl, P., and Kock, W. (eds.),Autopoietic Systems in the Social Sciences, Campus Verlag, Frankfurt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H. R. (1981). Autopoiesis. In Zeleny, M. (ed.),Autopoiesis: A Theory of Living Organization, Elsevier-North Holland, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H. R. (1983). What is it to see?Arch. Biol. Med. Exp. 16, 255–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H. R. (1985). The mind is not in the head.J. Soc. Biol. Struct. 8, 303–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H. R. (1988). Reality: The search for objectivity or the quest for a compelling argument.Irish J. Psychol. 9, 25–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H. R., and Guiloff, G. (1980). The quest for the intelligence of intelligence.J. Soc. Biol. Struct. 3, 135–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H. R., and Varela, F. G. (1980).Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H. R., and Varela, F. G. (1987).The Tree of Knowledge, Shambhala, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H. R., Uribe, G., and Frenk, S. (1968). A biological theory of relativistic colour coding in the primate retina.Arch. Biol. Med. Exp. Supl. 1, 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, G. H. (1934).Mind, Self and Society, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendez, C., Coddou, F., and Maturana, H. (1987). The bringing forth of pathology.Irish J. Psychol. 9, 144–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mingers, J. (1989). An introduction to autopoiesis-implications and applications.Syst. Pract. 2, 159–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mingers, J. (1990). The philosophical implications of Maturana's cognitive theories.Syst. Pract. 3, 569–584.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. (1969).Speech Acts, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teubner, G. (ed.) (1987).Autopoiesis and the Law, de Gruyter, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teubner, G. (1990). And God laughed ... indeterminancy, self-reference and paradox in law.EUI Working Paper 88/342, European University Institute, Florence.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varela, F. (1979).Principles of Biological Autonomy, Elsevier-North Holland, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varela, F. (1980). Describing the logic of the living. The adequacy and limitations of the idea of autopoiesis. In Zeleny, M. (ed.),Autopoiesis, Dissipative Structures and Spontaneous Social Orders, AAAS Selected Symposium 55, Westview Press, Boulder, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varela, F. (1981). Autonomy and autopoiesis. In Roth, G., and Schwegler, H. (eds.),Self-Organising Systems-an Interdisciplinary Approach, Campus Verlag, Frankfurt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varela, F. (1984). Two principles for self-organization. In Ulrich, H., and Probst, G. (eds.),Self-Organization and the Management of Social Systems, Springer, Frankfurt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varela, F. (1989). Reflections on the circulation of concepts between a biology of cognition and systemic family therapy,Family Proc. 28(March), 15–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varela, F. G., and Johnson, D. (1976). On observing natural systems.CoEvolut. Q. Summer, 26.

  • Varela, F., Maturana, H., and Uribe, R. (1974). Autopoiesis: The organization of living systems, its characterization and a model.Biosystems 5, 187–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Foerster, H. (1984). On constructing a reality. In Watzlawick, P. (ed.),The Invented Reality, Norton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilden, A. (1977).System and Structure, Tavistock, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winograd, T., and Flores, F. (1987).Understanding Computers and Cognition, Addison Wesley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mingers, J. The cognitive theories of Maturana and Varela. Systems Practice 4, 319–338 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01062008

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01062008

Key words

Navigation