Skip to main content
Log in

Phonemic awareness, naming, visual symbol processing, and reading

  • Published:
Reading and Writing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examined differences between adequate and poor readers in phonemic awareness, rapid continuous and confrontation naming, and visual symbol processing. It also investigated which of these skills make independent contributions to word recognition, pseudoword reading, and reading comprehension. Subjects were 170 school referrals of average intelligence, aged 6 to 10 years. The strongest differentiators of adequate and poor readers, with IQ and reading experience controlled, were phonemic awareness, naming speed for letters and pictured objects, and visual symbol processing. Letter naming speed made the largest independent contribution to word recognition, phonemic awareness to pseudoword reading, and object naming speed to reading comprehension. Confrontation picture naming accounted for minimal variance in reading skills, when IQ was controlled. It was concluded that tasks of naming speed, phonemic awareness, and visual symbol processing are valuable components of a diagnostic battery when testing children with possible reading disability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Badian, N. A., Duffy, F. H., Als, H. and McAnulty, G. B. (1991). Linguistic profiles of dyslexics and good readers,Annals of Dyslexia 41: 221–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badian, N. A., McAnulty, G. B., Duffy, F. H. and Als, H. (1990). Prediction of dyslexia in kindergarten boys,Annals of Dyslexia 40: 152–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blachman, B. A. (1983). Are we assessing the linguistic factors critical in early reading?,Annals of Dyslexia 33: 91–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, P. G., Steffy, R. and Tate, E. (1988). Comparison of the effects of IQ control methods on memory and naming speed predictors of reading disability,Reading Research Quarterly 23: 304–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, P. G. and Swanson, L. B. (1991). Naming speed deficits in reading disability: Multiple measures of a singular process,Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 51: 195–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowey, J. A. and Francis, J. (1991). Phonological analysis as a function of age and exposure to reading instruction,Applied Psycholinguistics 12: 91–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M., Town, P. and Buff, A. (1988). Neurodevelopmental differences in confrontational naming in children,Developmental Neuropsychology 4: 75–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. M. and Spring, C. (1990). The Digit Naming Speed Test: Its power and incremental validity in identifying children with specific reading disabilities,Psychology in the Schools 27: 15–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denckla, M. B. and Rudel, R. G. (1974). Rapid ‘automatized’ naming of pictured objects, colors, letters and numbers by normal children,Cortex 10: 186–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denckla, M. B. and Rudel, R. (1976). Rapid automatized naming (RAN): Dyslexia differentiated from other learning disabilities,Neuropsychologia 14: 471–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felton, R. H. and Brown, I. S. (1990). Phonological processes as predictors of specific reading skills in children at risk for reading failure,Reading and Writing 2: 39–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felton, R. H., Naylor, C. E. and Wood, F. B. (1990). Neuropsychological profile of adult dyslexics,Brain and Language 39: 485–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felton, R. H. and Wood, F. B. (1989). Cognitive deficits in reading disability and attention deficit disorder,Journal of Learning Disabilities 22: 3–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goswami, U. and Bryant, P. (1990).Phonological skills and learning to read. Hove (UK): Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, B. T. (1980).Jordan Left-Right Reversal Test. Novato, CA: Academic Therapy Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, E., Goodglass, H. and Weintraub, S. (1983).The Boston Naming Test. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, R. B. (1986). Phonological deficiencies in children with reading disability: Evidence from an object naming task,Cognition 22: 225–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liberman, I. Y. and Shankweiler, D. (1985). Phonology and the problems of learning to read and write,Remedial and Special Education 6: 8–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti, C. A., Beck, I., Bell, L. and Hughes, C. (1987). Phonemic knowledge and learning to read are reciprocal: A longitudinal study of first grade children,Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 33: 283–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosner, J. (1979).Helping children overcome learning difficulties. New York: Walker and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosner, J. and Simon, D. (1971). The Auditory Analysis Test: An initial report,Journal of Learning Disabilities 4: 384–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarborough, H. S. (1990). Very early language deficits in dyslexic children,Child Development 61: 1728–1743.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. E. (1988). Explaining the difference between the dyslexic and the garden-variety poor reader: The phonological-core variable-difference model,Journal of Learning Disabilities 21: 590–604.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. E., Cunningham, A. E. and Cramer, B. B. (1984). Assessing phonological awareness in kindergarten children: Issues of task comparability,Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 38: 175–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. E. and West, R. F. (1989). Exposure to print and orthographic processing,Reading Research Quarterly 24: 402–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R. K. and Torgesen, J. K. (1987). The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills,Psychological Bulletin 101: 192–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (1963).Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence. New York: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (1974).Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised. New York: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, M. (1984). Naming, reading, and the dyslexias: A longitudinal overview,Annals of Dyslexia 34: 87–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, M. (1986). Rapid alternating stimulus naming in the developmental dyslexia,Brain and Language 27: 360–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, M. (1991). Naming speed and reading: The contribution of the cognitive neurosciences,Reading Research Quarterly 26: 123–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, M., Bally, H. and Morris, R. (1986). Automaticity, retrieval processes and reading: A longitudinal study in average and impaired readers,Child Development 57: 988–1000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, M. and Goodglass, H. (1986). Dyslexia, dysnomia, and lexical retrieval: A longitudinal investigation,Brain and Language 28: 154–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, M. and Obregon, M. (1992). Early naming deficits, developmental dyslexia, and a specific deficit hypothesis,Brain and Language 42: 219–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock, R. W. (1987).Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests-Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yopp, H. K. (1988). The validity and reliability of phonemic awareness tests,Reading Research Quarterly 23: 159–177.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Badian, N.A. Phonemic awareness, naming, visual symbol processing, and reading. Read Writ 5, 87–100 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01026920

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01026920

Key words