Skip to main content
Log in

Phylogenetic relationships among the phyllotini (rodentia: Sigmodontinae) using morphological characters

  • Published:
Journal of Mammalian Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Thirty-three species representing all 14 genera of the South American rodent tribe Phyllotini and 5 problematic genera are surveyed for 96 multistate and binary dental, cranial, skeletal, external, and male reproductive tract characters. Wagner parsimony analysis confirmsCalomys as the most basal phyllotine genus, and as currently constituted it is likely paraphyletic. The results are consistent with the exclusion ofPseudoryzomys from the phyllotines and the separation ofReithrodon andNeotomys fromHolochilus at the tribal level. Several highly differentiated generic groups that include a radiation of altiplano endemics centered onAuliscomys and the largely southern Andean/PatagonianReithrodon group appear to form a clade. AGraomys generic group that includesAndalgalomys andEligmodontia is also apparent, but its relationships to other phyllotines are obscured by poorly resolved internal nodes in the more species-rich and probably paraphyletic genusPhyllotis. The significance and consequences of more intensive taxonomic sampling are discussed. The taxonomic consequences of the phylogeny are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  • Archie, J. W. (1989). A randomization test for phylogenetic information in systematic data.Syst. Zool. 38 239–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baskin, J. A. (1978).Bensonomys, Calomys, and the origin of the phyllotine group of neotropical cricetines (Rodentia: Cricetidae).J. Mamm. 59 125–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, J. K. (1993).Systematic Relationships of the Tribe Phyllotini (Muridae: Sigmodontinae) of South America, Oklahoma Museum of Natural History, Norman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carleton, M. D. (1973). A survey of gross stomach morphology in New World Cricetinae (Rodentia, Muroidea), with comments on functional interpretations.Misc. Publ. Mus. Zool. Univ. Mich. 146 1–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carleton, M. D., and Musser, G. G. (1984). Muroid rodents. In:Orders and Families of Recent Mammals of the World, S. Anderson and J. K. Jones Jr., eds., pp. 289–379, John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czaplewski, N. J. (1987). Sigmodont rodents (Mammalia; Muroidea; Sigmodontinae) from the Pliocene (Early Blancan) Verde Formation, Arizona.J. Vert. Paleo. 7 183–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellerman, J. R. (1941).The Families and Genera of Living Rodents, Vol. 2. Family Muridae, British Museum (Nat. Hist.), London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farris, J. S. (1989). The retention index and the rescaled consistency index.Cladistics 5 417–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein, J. (1985). Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap.Evolution 39 783–791.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, A. L., and Patton, J. L. (1976). Karyotypic variation in oryzomyine rodents (Cricetinae) with comments on chromosomal evolution in the neotropical cricetine complex.Occ. Pap. Mus. Zool. La. State Univ. 49 1–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hershkovitz, P. (1955). South American marsh rats, genusHolochilus, with a summary of sigmodont rodents.Field. Zool. 37 639–673.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hershkovitz, P. (1962). Evolution of neotropical cricetine rodents (Muridae) with special reference to the phyllotine group.Field. Zool. 46 1–524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hershkovitz, P. (1966). South American swamp and fossorial rats of the Scapteromyine group (Cricetinae, Murinae) with comments on the glans penis in murid taxonomy.Z. Säugetierkunde 31 81–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooper, E. T., and Musser, G. G. (1964). The glans penis in neotropical cricetines (Muridae) with comments on classification of muroid rodents.Misc. Publ. Mus. Zool. Univ. Mich. 123 1–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, L. L., and Lindsay, E. H. (1984). Holarctic radiation of Neogene muroid rodents and the origin of South American cricetids.J. Vert. Paleo. 4 265–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddison, W. P., Donoghue, M. J., and Maddison, D. R. (1984). Outgroup analysis and parsimony.Syst. Zool. 33 83–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, L. G., Webb, S. D., Sepkoski, J. J., Jr., and Raup, D. M. (1982). Mammalian evolution and the Great American interchange.Science 215 1351–1357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musser, G. G., and Carleton, M. D. (1993). Family Muridae. In:Mammal Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference, D. E. Wilson and D. M. Reeder, eds., pp. 501–756, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olds, N. (1988).A Revision of the Genus Calomys (Rodentia: Muridae), Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, City University of New York, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olds, N., and Anderson, S. (1989). A diagnosis of the tribe Phyllotini (Rodentia, Muridae). In:Advances in Neotropical Mammalogy, K. H. Redford and J. F. Eisenberg, eds., pp. 55–74, Sandhill Crane Press, Gainesville, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osgood, W. H. (1943). The mammals of Chile.Field Mus. Nat. Hist. Zool. Ser. 30 1–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osgood, W. H. (1947). Cricetine rodents allied toPhyllotis.J. Mamm. 28 165–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, O. P. (1958). A taxonomic revision of the rodent genusPhyllotis.Univ. Calif. Publ. Zool. 56 391–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, O. P., and Patton, J. L. (1976). Relationships among South American phyllotine rodents based on chromosome analysis.J. Mamm. 57 339–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reig, O. A. (1980). A new fossil genus of South American cricetid rodents allied toWeidomys, with an assessment of the Sigmodontinae.J. Zool. Lond. 192 257–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reig, O. A. (1986). Diversity patterns and differentiation of high Andean rodents. In:High Altitude Tropical Biogeography, F. Vuilleumier and M. Monasterio, eds., pp. 404–439, Oxford University Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarich, V. (1985). Rodent macromolecular systematics. In:Evolutionary Relationships Among Rodents: A Multidisciplinary Analysis, W. P. Luckett and J.-L. Hartenberger, eds., pp. 423–452, Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonetti, J. Z., and Spotorno, A. O. (1980). Posicion taxonomica dePhyllotis micropus (Rodentia: Cricetidae).An. Mus. Hist. Nat. Valparaiso 13 285–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spotorno, A. O. (1986).Systematics and Evolutionary Relationships of Andean Phyllotine and Akodontine Rodents, Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swofford, D. L. (1993).PAUP: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony, Version 3.1, Computer program distributed by the Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign.

  • Vorontsov, N. N. (1959). Sistema khomiakov (Cricetinae) mirovoi fauny i ikh filogeneticheskie sviazi.Biul. Mosk. Obsh. Isp. Prir. Otd. Biol. 44 134–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voss, R. S. (1988). Systematics and ecology of ichthyomyine rodents (Muroidea): Patterns of morphological evolution in a small adaptive radiation.Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 188 259–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voss, R. S. (1991). An introduction to the neotropical rodent genusZygodontomys.Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 210 1–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voss, R. S. (1993). A revision of the Brazilian muroid rodent genusDelomys with remarks on “thomasomyine” characters.Am. Mus. Novit. 3073 1–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voss, R. S., and Carleton, M. D. (1993). A new genus forHesperomys molitor Winge andHolochilus magnus Hershkovitz, with comments on phylogenetic relationships and oryzomyine monophyly.Am. Mus. Novit. (in press).

  • Voss, R. S., and Linzey, A. V. (1980). Comparative gross morphology of male accessory glands among neotropical Muridae (Mammalia: Rodentia) with comments on systematic implications.Misc. Publ. Mus. Zool. Univ. Mich. 159 1–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, L. I., and Spotorno, A. E. (1992). Tandem and centric fusions in the chromosomal evolution of the South American phyllotines of the genusAuliscomys (Rodentia, Cricetidae).Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 61 135–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, D. F., and Mares, M. A. (1978). A new genus and species of phyllotine rodent (Mammalia: Muridae) from northwestern Argentina.Ann. Carnegie Mus. 47 193–221.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Steppan, S. Phylogenetic relationships among the phyllotini (rodentia: Sigmodontinae) using morphological characters. J Mammal Evol 1, 187–213 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01024707

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01024707

Key words

Navigation