Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

The communication of policy meanings: Implementation as interpretation and text

  • Published:
Policy Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Interpretive approaches to policy analysis introduce a set of questions about how policy meanings are communicated to multiple audiences, and exploring these questions is a useful alternative to more traditional positivist approaches to understanding policy implementation. The article explores the theoretical background for one such approach illustrated by a case study of the Israel Corporation of Community Centers from 1969 to 1981 which shows how meanings were communicated through agency objects, language, and acts that represented policy and societal values. Agency artifacts are shown to symbolize tacitly known meanings as well as those which are part of a policy's explicit language. Not only do implementors and other situational actors interpret these artifacts; the policy and these interpretations may be “read” as a “text” about societal values and identity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Appleyard, Donald (1979). ‘The environment as a social symbol,’APA Journal 45: 143–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ascher, William (1987). ‘Editorial,’Policy Sciences 20: 3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avruch, Kevin (1987). ‘The emergence of ethnicity in Israel,’American Ethnologist 14: 327–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baier, Victoria E., James G. March and Harald Saetren (1986). ‘Implementation and ambiguity,’Scandinavian Journal of Management Studies 2: 197–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardach, Eugene (1977).The Implementation Game. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Ari, Eyal and Yoram Bilu (1987). ‘Saints' sanctuaries in Israeli development towns’,Urban Anthropology 16: 243–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, Max (1962).Models and Metaphors. NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunner, Ronald D. (1982). ‘The policy sciences as science,’Policy Sciences 15: 115–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunner, Ronald D. (1987). ‘Key political symbols,’Policy Sciences 20: 53–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, Kenneth (1945).A Grammar of Motives. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrell, Gibson and Gareth Morgan (1979).Sociological Paradigms and Organisational Analysis. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciardi, John (1959).How Does a Poem Mean? Boston: Houghton, Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comay, Yochanan and Alan Kirschenbaum (1973). ‘The Israeli new town,’Economic Development and Cultural Change 22: 124–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, Scott and Dvora Yanow (1993). ‘Culture and organizational learning,’Journal of Management Inquiry 2 (4): forthcoming.

  • Cooper, Clare (1974). ‘The house as symbol of self,’ in J. Lang et al., eds.,Designing for Human Behavior. Stroudsberg, PA: Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, Murray (1964).The Symbolic Uses of Politics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fombrun, Charles and Mark Shanley (1990). ‘What's in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy,’Academy of Management Journal 33: 233–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, Charles J. (1990). ‘Implementation research: Why and how to transcend positivist methodologies,’ in Dennis J. Palumbo and Donald J. Calista, eds.,Implementation and the Policy Process. New York: Greenwood Press, pp. 199–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giovanni, Joseph (1985). ‘The grand reach of corporate architecture,’New York Times, January 20, Section 3: 1, pp. 28–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, Harvey (1984).Greentown's Youth. Assen, The Netherlands: Van Gorcum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, Harvey (1987). ‘The changing meaning of ethnic affiliation,’The Jerusalem Quarterly 44 (Fall): 39–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, Nelson (1985). ‘How buildings mean,’Critical Inquiry 11: 642–653.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodsell, Charles (1988).The Social Meaning of Civic Space. University of Kansas Press.

  • Hawkesworth, M. E. (1988).Theoretical Issues in Policy Analysis. Albany: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healy, Paul (1986). ‘Interpretive policy inquiry,’Policy Sciences 19: 381–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hummel, Ralph (1991). ‘Stories managers tell,’Public Administration Review 51: 31–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingersoll, Virginia and Guy B. Adams (1986). ‘Beyond organizational boundaries,’Administration and Society 18: 360–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kantor, Edna (1986). ‘Creation of “Mofet” network of new clubhouses approved,’Ma'ariv (June 26; Hebrew).

  • Kilmann, Ralph et al., eds. (1985).Gaining Control of the Corporate Culture. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunda, Gideon (1992).Engineering Culture. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson (1980).Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell, Harold D. (1979).The Signature of Power. NJ: Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipsky, Michael (1979).Street-Level Bureaucracy. NY: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Love, Janice and Peter C. Sederberg (1987). ‘Euphony and cacophony in policy implementation,’Policy Studies Review 7 (1): 155–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyndon, Donlyn (1984). ‘Public buildings: Symbols qualified by experience,’The Public Interest 74: 77–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard-Moody, Steven and Marisa Kelly (1992). ‘Stories public managers tell about elected officials,’ in B. Bozeman, ed.,Public Management Theory. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Donald F. (1985). ‘Social policy: An exercise in metaphor.’Knowledge 7: 191–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortony, Andrew, ed. (1979).Metaphor and Thought. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouchi, William and Alan Wilkins (1985). ‘Organizational culture,’Annual Review of Sociology 11: 457–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palumbo, Dennis J. and Donald J. Calista, eds. (1987). Symposium on implementation.Policy Studies Review 7 (1).

  • Palumbo, Dennis J. and Donald J. Calista, eds. (1990).Implementation and the Policy Process. New York: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peled, Yoav (1990). ‘Ethnic exclusionism in the periphery: The case of Oriental Jews in Israel's development towns,’Ethnic and Racial Studies 13: 345–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, Michael (1966).The Tacit Dimension. New York: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pondy, Louis et al., eds. (1983).Organizational Symbolism. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressman, Jeffrey and Aaron Wildavsky (1973).Implementation. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rein, Martin and Donald Schön (1977). ‘Problem setting in policy research,’ in Carol H. Weiss,Using Social Research in Public Policy Making. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ronnen, Meir (1980). ‘Architectural sculpture,’Jerusalem Post (October 17).

  • Schön, Donald A. (1979). ‘Generative metaphor,’ in A. Ortony, ed.,Metaphor and Thought. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 254–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutz, Alfred (1962). ‘Concept and theory formation in the social sciences,’ in hisCollected Papers, Vol. I. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, pp. 48–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shachar, Arie S. (1971). ‘Israel's development towns,’AIP Journal 37: 362–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smircich, Linda (1983). ‘Concepts of culture and organizational analysis,’Administrative Science Quarterly 28: 339–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Merrit Roe (1979). ‘Technology in America,’ a lecture at M.I.T., quoted in Richard E. Sclove, ‘The nuts and bolts of democracy,’ a paper presented at the 5th Biennial International Conference of the Society for Philosophy and Technology, Bordeaux, France, June 1989.

  • Spiegel, Erika (1966).New Towns in Israel. Stuttgart: Karl Kramer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spilerman, Seymour and Jack Habib (1976). ‘Development towns in Israel,’American Journal of Sociology 81: 781–812.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steele, Fritz and Stephen Jencks (1977).The Feel of the Work Place. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, Deborah A. (1988).Policy Paradox and Political Reason. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tevet, Shabtai (1970). ‘Too many development towns,’Ha'aretz (February 26; Hebrew).

  • Torgerson, Douglas (1985). ‘Contextual orientation in policy analysis,’Policy Sciences 18: 241–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torgerson, Douglas (1986a). ‘Between knowledge and politics,’Policy Sciences 19: 33–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torgerson, Douglas (1986b). ‘Interpretive policy inquiry,’Policy Sciences 19: 307–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, Joseph and Andre Delbecq (1987). ‘High-technology cultures and management,’Group and Organization Studies 12: 39–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yanow, Dvora (1987a), ‘Ontological and interpretive logics in organizational studies,’Methods 1 (2): 73–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yanow, Dvora (1987b). ‘Toward a policy culture approach to implementation,’Policy Studies Review 7 (1): 103–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yanow, Dvora (1990). ‘Tackling the implementation problem: Epistemological issues in implementation research,’ in Dennis J. Palumbo and Donald J. Calista, eds.,Implementation and the Policy Process. New York: Greenwood Press, pp. 213–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yanow, Dvora (1992a). ‘Supermarkets and culture clash: The epistemological role of metaphors in administrative practice,’The American Review of Public Administration 22: 89–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yanow, Dvora (1992b). ‘Silences in public policy discourse: The role of organizational and policy myths,’Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 2: 399–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yanow, Dvora (1993). ‘Reading policy meanings in organization-scapes,’Journal of Architectural and Planning Research 10 (4): forthcoming.

  • Zipori, Haim (1971). ‘Report and background material: Definition of purposes,’ Jerusalem: ICCC files (Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zipori, Haim (1972). ‘The emergence of the Community Centers in Israel and their development,’ a lecture presented to the Schwartz Program, Baerwald School of Social Work, Hebrew University of Jerusalem (Hebrew).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Public Administration, California State University, 94542, Hayward, CA, USA

    Dvora Yanow

Authors
  1. Dvora Yanow
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yanow, D. The communication of policy meanings: Implementation as interpretation and text. Policy Sci 26, 41–61 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01006496

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01006496

Keywords